History, design characteristics, and uses of the pictorial activity and task sorts

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 175-195

  Matheson, Leonard N ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Function sorts; Functional capacity evaluation; Questionnaires; Self report measures

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATION OF DRUGS, FOOD AND CHEMICALS; APTITUDE; BUILDING; EVALUATION; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INDUSTRIAL WORKER; INFORMATION PROCESSING; JOB ANALYSIS; LANGUAGE; MEASUREMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; READING; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HUMANS; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRES; REHABILITATION, VOCATIONAL; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 3542995164     PISSN: 10530487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:JOOR.0000022760.71820.91     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Taylor F. Principles of scientific management. New York: Harper, 1919.
2. Yerkes R. Man-power and military effectiveness: The case for human engineering. J Consult Psychol 1941; 5: 205-209.
3. 3. Yerkes R, Bridges J, Hardwick R. A point scale for measuring mental ability. Baltimore: Warwick & York, 1915.
4. Thurstone L. Primary mental abilities. New York: Harper & Brother, 1938.
5. Bingham W. Aptitudes and aptitude testing. New York: Harper & Brother, 1937.
6. Bingham W. Army personnel work. J Appl Psychol 1919; 3: 1-12.
7. Shartle C. Occupational information, its development and application. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1946.
8. U.S. Employment Service. Dictionary of occupational titles, 1st edn. Washington, DC: U.S. Employment Service, 1939.
9. Science Research Associates. Army general classification test, 1st civilian edn. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1947.
10. Fine S. What is occupational information? Pers Guid J 1955; 33(9): 453-468.
11. U.S. Department of Labor. Dictionary of occupational titles, 3rd edn. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, 1965.
12. McCormick E, Mecham R, Jeanneret P. Position Analysis Questionnaire, PAQ Services, Inc.: Logan, UT, 1991.
13. Fleishman E. On the relation between abilities, learning, and human performance. Am Psychol 1972; Nov: 1017-1032.
14. Fleishman E. Evaluating physical abilities required by jobs. Pers Adm 1979; June: 82-87.
15. Fleishman E, Quaintance M. Taxonomies of human performance: The description of human tasks. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1984.
16. Peterson N, Mumford M, Borman W, Jeanneret P, Fleishman E. Development of prototype occupational information system (O*NET) content model. Utah Department of Employment Security: St. Lake City, UT, 1995.
17. Lytel R, Botterbush K. Physical demands job analysis: A new approach. Menominee, WI: Stout Vocational Rehabilitation Institute, 1981.
18. Botterbusch K. Vocational assessment and evaluation systems: A comparison. Menomonie, WI: University of Wisconsin Materials Development Center, 1987.
19. Fry R, Botterbusch K (eds.). VEWAA glossary: A collection of terms and definitions of special importance to vocational evaluation and adjustment services personnel. Menomonie, WI: University of Wisconsin-Stout, Stout Vocational Rehabilitation Institute, Materials Development Center, 1988, p. 21.
20. Gannaway T, Sink J. The relationship between the vocational evaluation system by Singer and employment success in occupational groups. Vocat Eval Work Adjustm Bull 1978; 11(2): 38-45.
21. Vocational Evaluation and Work Adjustment Association. Vocational evaluation and work adjustment standards with interpretive guidelines and VEWAA glossary.Menomonie, WI: University of Wisconsin-Stout, Stout Vocational Rehabilitation Institute, Materials Development Center, 1978, p. 20.
22. Vactor H, Hubach J. The industrial engineering approach to work evaluation. Vocat Eval Work Adjustm Bull 1979; Winter: 14-17.
23. Dictionary of occupational titles, classification of jobs, 4th suppl. edn., Vols. I and II. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, 1986.
24. Golter G, Golter M. VOCOMP. Woodland Hills, CA: VOCOMP Corporation, 1976.
25. Gibson G. OASYS occupational information system. Bellevue, WA: Vertek, Inc., 1983.
26. Matheson L, Ogden L. Work tolerance screening. Trabuco Canyon, CA: Rehabilitation Inst of Southern California, 1983.
27. Matheson L. Evaluation of lifting and lowering capacity. Vocat Eval Work Adjustm Bull, 1986; 19(4): 107-111.
28. Isernhagen SJ. Functional capacity evaluation. In: Isernhagen SJ, ed. Work injury: Management and prevention. Rockville, MD: Aspen, 1988, p. 139-174.
29. Matheson L. RISC Tool Sort. Woodland Hills, CA: Rehabilitation Institute of Southern California, 1979.
30. U.S. Department of Labor. Handbook for analyzing jobs. Washington, DC: Manpower Administration, 1972.
31. Matheson L. WEST Tool Sort. Signal Hill, CA: Work Evaluation Systems Technology, 1981.
32. Matheson L, Ogden L, Violette K, Schultz K. Work hardening: Occupational therapy in industrial rehabilitation. Am J Occup Ther 1985; 39(5): 314-321.
33. U.S. Department of Labor. Dictionary of occupational titles, 4th edn. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, 1977.
34. Anzai D. Loma Linda Activity Sort. Fort Bragg, CA: Work Evaluation Systems Technology, 1984.
35. Matheson L, Matheson M. Spinal Function Sort. Wildwood, MO: Employment Potential Improvement Corporation, 1989.
36. Matheson L, Matheson M, Grant J. Hand Function Sort. Wildwood, MO: Employment Potential Improvement Corporation, 1995.
37. Baum M, Edwards D. Activity Card Sort. St. Louis, MO: Occupational Therapy Program, Washington University School of Medicine, 1993.
38. Everard K, Lach H, Fisher E, Baum C. Relationship of activity and social support to the functional health of older adults. J Gerontol: Soc Sci 2000; 55B: S208-S212.
39. Hanson M, Matheson L, Borman W. The O*NET occupational information system. In Bolton B, ed. Handbook of measurement and evaluation in rehabilitation. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen, 2001, pp. 281-309.
40. Peterson N, Mumford M, Borman W, Jeanneret P, Fleishman E, (eds.). An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1999, p. 336.
41. Gaudino E, Matheson L, Mael F. Development of the Functional Assessment Taxonomy. J Occup Rehabil 2001; 11(3): 155-175.
42. Cummings K, McDonald C, Mitan R, Payne M, Stapinski C, Matheson L, Kaskutas V. Generalized Work Function Questionnaire: Targeted constructs. St. Louis, MO: Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine. 1999, p. 150.
43. Matheson L, Haynes B. Generalized Work Function Questionnaire. St. Louis, MO: Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, 2003.
44. Mooney V, Matheson L, Leggett S, Mayer J, Verna J, Driesinger T, DeFilippo G, Balourdas G, Kemp D. Multidimensional task ability-profile. San Diego: MindTrust, 2003.
45. Fleishman E, Reilly M. Administrator's guide: Fleishman job analysis survey. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1992.
46. Robinson RC, Kishino N, Matheson L, Woods S, Hoffman K, Unterberg J, Pearson C, Adams L, Gatchel R. Improvement in postoperative and nonoperative spinal patients on a self-report measure of disability: The Spinal Function Sort (SFS). J Occup Rehabil 2003; 13(2): 107-113.
47. Murakami E. Construct validity of a self-report measure of musculoskeletal back and neck pain. St. Louis, MO: Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, 2001, p. 34.
48. Sufka A, Hauger B, Trenary M, Bishop B, Hagen A, Lozon R, Martens B. Centralization of low back pain and perceived functional outcome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 27(3): 205-212.
49. Fairbank J, Couper J, Davies J, Brein J. The Oswestry Low Back Pain in Disability Questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980; 66(8): 271-273.
50. Ware JJ, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Med Care 1992; 30(6): 473-481.
51. Gibson L, Strong J. The reliability and validity of a measure of perceived functional capacity for work in chronic back pain. J Occup Rehabil 1996; 6(3): 159-175.
52. Ping CL, Keung SC, Yee PL. Functional assessment of repetitive strain injuries: Two case studies. J Hand Ther 1996; 9(4): 394-398.
53. Hartman-Maeir A, Soroker N, Oman SD, Katz N. Awareness of disabilities in stroke rehabilitation - A clinical trial. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25(1): 35-44.
54. Haynes B. A test to measure itself perceived ability to work: Generalized Work Function Questionnaire. Development and reliability testing. St. Louis, MO: Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, 2003.
55. Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2000; 25(24): 3115-3124.
56. Bombardier C. Outcome assessments in the evaluation and treatment of spinal disorders. Spine 2000; 25(24): 3100-3103.
57. American College of Sports Medicine. Guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 6th edn. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000.
58. American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author, 1999.
59. Johnston M, Keith R, Hinderer S. Measurement standards for interdisciplinary medical rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: S3-S23.
60. Rothstein J, Campbell S, Echternach J, Jette A, Knecht H, Rose S. Standards for tests and measurements in physical therapy practice. In: Rothstein J, Echternach J, eds. Primer on measurement. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association, 1993, pp. 3-47.