The inverse conductivity problem with an imperfectly known boundary in three dimensions

SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1440-1452

  Kolehmainen, Ville ^a   Lassas, Matti ^b   Ola, Petri ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Cotton York tensor; Electrical impedance tomography; Inverse conductivity problem; Unknown boundary

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; ERROR ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

CONVEX DOMAIN; COTTON-YORK TENSOR; INVERSE CONDUCTIVITY PROBLEM; UNKNOWN BOUNDARY;

INVERSE PROBLEMS;

EID: 35349031124     PISSN: 00361399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/060666986     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. A. ADLER, R. GUARDO, AND Y. BERTHIAUME, Impedance imaging of lung ventilation: Do we need to account for chest expansion?, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engrg., 43 (1996), pp. 414-420.
2. S. ALDERSLEY, Comments on certain divergence-free tensor densities in a 3-space, J. Math. Phys., 20 (1979), pp. 1905-1907.
3. K. ASTALA, M. LASSAS, AND L. PÄIVÄ RINTA, Calderón's inverse problem for anisotropic conductivity in plane, Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 30 (2005), pp. 207-224.
4. K. ASTALA AND L. PÄIVÄRINTA, Calderón's inverse conductivity problem in the plane, Ann. of Math. (2), 163 (2006), pp. 265-299.
5. A. CALDERÓN, On an inverse boundary value problem, in Seminar on Numerical Analysis and Its Applications to Continuum Physics (Rio de Janeiro, 1980), Soc. Brasil Mat., Rio de Janeiro, 1980, pp. 65-73.
6. K.-S. CHENG, D. ISAACSON, J. C. NEWELL, AND D. G. GISSER, Electrode models for electric current computed tomography, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engrg., 36 (1989), pp. 918-924.
7. E. COTTON, Sur les varietes a trois dimensions, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse, 4 (1899), pp. 385-438.
8. L. EISENHART, Riemannian Geometry, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1977.
9. E. GERSING, B. HOFFMAN, AND M. OSYPKA, Influence of changing peripheral geometry on electrical impedance tomography measurements, Med. Biolog. Engrg. Computing, 34 (1996), pp. 359-361.
10. A. GREENLEAF, M. LASSAS, AND G. UHLMANN, The Calderón problem for conormal potentials, I: Global uniqueness and reconstruction, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 56 (2003), pp. 328-352.
11. C. HSÜ, Generalization of Cohn-Vossen's theorem, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 11 (1960), pp. 845-846.
12. 3, Duke Math. J., 67 (1992), pp. 423-459.
13. D. ISAACSON, J. MUELLER, J. NEWELL, AND S. SILTANEN, Reconstructions of chest phantoms by the d-bar method for electrical impedance tomography, IEEE TVans. Medical Imaging, 23 (2004), pp. 821-828.
14. V. KOLEHMAINEN, M. VAUHKONEN, P. KARJALAINEN, AND J. KAIPIO, Assessment of errors in static electrical impedance tomography with adjacent and trigonometric current patterns, Physiolog. Measurement, 18 (1997), pp. 289-303.
15. V. KOLEHMAINEN, M. LASSAS, AND P. OLA, The inverse conductivity problem with an imperfectly known boundary, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 66 (2005), pp. 365-383.
16. A. KATCHALOV, Y. KURYLEV, AND M. LASSAS, Inverse Boundary Spectral Problems, Chapman Hall/CRC Monogr. Surv. Pure Appl. Math. 123, Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, FL, 2001.
17. M. LASSAS AND G. UHLMANN, On determining a Riemannian manifold from the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map, Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup., 34 (2001), pp. 771-787.
18. M. LASSAS, M. E. TAYLOR, AND G. UHLMANN, The Dirichlet-to-Neumann map for complete Riemannian manifolds with boundary, Comm. Anal. Geom., 11 (2003), pp. 207-221.
19. J. LEE AND G. UHLMANN, Determining anisotropic real-analytic conductivities by boundary measurements, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 42 (1989), pp. 1097-1112.
20. W. LIONHEART, Boundary shape and electrical impedance tomography, Inverse Problems, 14 (1998), pp. 139-147.
21. J. L. MUELLER AND S. SILTANEN, Direct reconstructions of conductivities from boundary measurements, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 24 (2003), pp. 1232-1266.
22. A. NACHMAN, Reconstructions from boundary measurements, Ann. of Math. (2), 128 (1988), pp. 531-576.
23. A. NACHMAN, Global uniqueness for a two-dimensional inverse boundary value problem, Ann. Math., 143 (1996), pp. 71-96.
24. L. NIRENBERG, The Weyl and Minkowski problems in differential geometry in the large, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 6 (1953), pp. 337-394.
25. L. PÄIVÄRINTA, A. PANCHENKO, AND G. UHLMANN, Complex geometrical optics solutions for Lipschitz conductivities, Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana, 19 (2003), pp. 57-72.
26. A. POGORELOV, The rigidity of general convex surfaces, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.), 79 (1951), pp. 739-742 (in Russian).
27. R. SACKSTEDER, The rigidity of hypersurfaces, J. Math. Mech., 11 (1962), pp. 929-939.
28. S. SILTANEN, J. MUELLER, AND D. ISAACSON, An implementation of the reconstruction algorithm of A. Nachman for the 2-D inverse conductivity problem, Inverse Problems, 16 (2000), pp. 681-699.
29. E. SOMERSALO, M. CHENEY, AND D. ISAACSON, Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 52 (1992), pp. 1023-1040.
30. J. SYLVESTER, An anisotropic inverse boundary value problem, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 43 (1990), pp. 201-232.
31. J. SYLVESTER AND G. UHLMANN, A global uniqueness theorem for an inverse boundary value problem, Ann. of Math. (2), 125 (1987), pp. 153-169.
32. J. THOMAS, Conformal invariants, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 12 (1926), pp. 389-393.