Descriptive differential attributes of type of fleeces in Llama fibre and its textile consequence: 1 - Descriptive aspects

Journal of the Textile Institute

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 251-259

  Frank, E N ^a   Hick, M V H ^a   Adot, O ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CÓRDOBA   (Argentina)

^b Habitat Foundation   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Classification; Differentiation; Fleece types; Llama fleeces

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COATED MATERIALS; DIFFERENTIATION (CALCULUS); LUMINANCE; OPTICAL PROPERTIES; TEXTILE PROCESSING;

FLEECE TYPES; LLAMA FIBRE;

TEXTILE FIBERS;

ANIMAL FIBERS; CLASSIFICATION; DIFFERENTIATION; LUSTER; TEXTILE FIBERS;

FIBER LENGTH; FIBER PROPERTY; FLEECE; NATURAL FIBER; THICKNESS;

EID: 35349005280     PISSN: 00405000     EISSN: 17542340     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00405000701489362     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aiken, J. D. and Ryder, M. L. (1962) A possible method for assessing the extent of 'dogginess' in Merino wools from the proportion of individual fibres affected. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb., 3, pp. 269-275.
2. de Frank, N. M. Cantantore (1983) Estadística no paramétrica. Manual de Estadística Aplicada, 2, p. 316. Buenos Aires
3. Conover, W. J. (1999) Statistics of the Kolmogotov-Smirnov type. Practical Nonparametric Statistics., p. 584. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Phoenix, USA
4. Dry, F. W. (1975) The Architecture of Lamb's Coats. A Speculative Study, p. 300. Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
5. Fallet, M. (1961) Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Wollbildung südamerikanischer Tylopen. Ztschr. f. Tierzüchtung u. Züchtungsbiologie., 5:1, pp. 34-56.
6. Frank, E. N., Freire, C. M. Nuevo and Morini, C. L. (1985) Contribución al estudio del Vellón de Llama. Rev. Arg. Prod. Anim., 5:78, pp. 513-521.
7. Frank, E. N. and Whebe, V. E. (1993) Producción y Comercialización de fibra de Camélidos Argentinos domésticos. Taller sobre producción y comercialización de fibras especiales, pp. 81-96. Bariloche, Argentina pp. 81-96. Bariloche, Argentina
8. Frank, E. N. and Hick, M. H. V. (1995) A reliable and cheap technique for classification of SADC fibre on commercial quality characteristics [abstract]. Proceedings of the 2nd European Symposium on South American Camelids, pp. 43-44. Camerino, Italy
9. Frank, E. N., Hick, M. H. V., Lamas, H. E. and Whebe, V. E. (1996) A demographic study on commercial characteristics of fleece in Argentine Domestic Camelids (CAD) flocksProceedings of the 2nd European Symposium on South American Camelids. Proceedings of the 2nd European Symposium on South American Camelids Camerino, Italypp. 51-64.
10. Frank, E. N., Lamas, H. E., Ramírez, M. S. and Hick, M. V. H. (1995) La estructura del vellón de Camélidos Argentinos Domésticos y factores que la modifican, pp. 103-120. University of Camerino Stampa, Camerino, Italy
11. Goldsworthy, Y. E. and Lang, W. R. (1954) The relationship of fibre form and Staple Crimp in Merino wool. Text. Inst., 49, pp. T555-T773.
12. Iñiguez, L. C., Alem, R., Wauer, A. and Mueller, J. (1998) Fleece types, fiber characteristics and production system of an outstanding llama population from Southern Bolivia. Small Ruminant Res., 30:1, pp. 57-65.
13. Jackson, N. and Rottenbury, R. A. (1994) Style metrology. Specification of Australian Wool and Its Implications for Marketing and Processing, p. 14. CSIRO and IWS, Sydney
14. Lang, W. R. (1947) The dependence of wool quality number on crimp and fineness in Australian wool. J. Test. Inst., 38, pp. T257-T270.
15. Macagno, L. (1936) La raza de alpacas Suri. Rev. La Chacra., (Bs.As.), 3, p. 10.
16. McGuirk, B. J. and Short, B. F. (1967) The 'Lustre' mutation in Merino Sheep. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb., 7, pp. 296-303.
17. Onions, W. (1962) The structure and chemistry of wool and hair. Wool. An Introduction to Its Properties, Varieties, Uses and Production, p. 278. Ernest Benn Ltd, London, United Kingdom
18. Rossouw, S. D. (1931) Relationship between contour and crimp in wool fibres. J. Text. Inst., 22, pp. T374-T348.
19. Ryder, M. L. and Stephenson, S. K. (1968) Wool Growth, p. 805. Academic Press, London and New York
20. Safley, M. (1997) Some views on evaluating suri fiber. The Alpaca Registry J., 2:2, pp. 1-6.
21. Shelton, M. (1981) Fiber production. Goat Production, pp. 379-409. Academic Press, London
22. Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. (1981) Biometry, Freeman, San Francisco
23. Stamberg, E. (1987) Fiber characteristics. Wool. Llamapaedia. A Web site of VMRCVM
24. Stevens, D. and Crowe, D. W. (1994) Style and processing effects. Specification of Australian Wool and Its Implications for Marketing and Processing, p. 12. CSIRO and IWS, Sydney
25. Thomas, S., Gaier, D. and Bowling, A. (1989) The curly horse in America. Myth and Mystery, p. 125. C. S. Fund, Inc., Freestone, CA
26. Vidal, S. O. (1967) La crianza de la llama y algunas características de su fibra, Tesis. UNA La Molina, Lima, Perú
27. Leon, J. Villarroel (1991) Las fibras. Avances y Perspectivas del Conocimiento de los Camélidos Sud Americanos, pp. 363-387. Regional de FAO, Santiago, Chile
28. Warwick, B. L., Davis, S. P., Berry, R. O. and Patterson, R. E. (1960) "Silky" a dominant mutation in sheep. J. Hered., 51, pp. 39-42.
29. Wickham, G. A. (1984) The genetic control of wool type. Colour Sheep and Their Products: World Congress of Coloured Sheep, pp. 222-231. New Zealand
30. Winston, C. R. (1989) Objective measurement and processing consequences of style and type. Wool Tech. Sheep Breed., 37:1, pp. 27-32.
31. Woods, H. J. (1935) Crimp forms in Merino wool fibres. I-Descriptive. J. Text. Inst., 26, pp. T93-T102.