Inferring design: Evidence of a preference for teleological explanations in patients with Alzheimer's disease

Psychological Science

Volumn 18, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 999-1006

  Lombrozo, Tania ^a   Kelemen, Deborah ^b   Zaitchik, Deborah ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ARTICLE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; DECISION MAKING; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ETHICAL THEORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; CAUSALITY; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COGNITION DISORDERS; ETHICAL THEORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE;

EID: 35348966978     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02015.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Apperly, I.A., Riggs, K.J., Simpson, A., Chiavarino, C. Samson, D. (2006). Is belief reasoning automatic? Psychological Science, 17, 841 844.
2. Brumby, M. (1985). Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Science Education, 68, 493 503.
3. Casler, K. Kelemen, D. (2007). Developmental continuity in teleo-functional explanation: Reasoning about nature among Romanian Romani adults. Manuscript submitted for publication.
4. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
5. DiYanni, C. Kelemen, D. (2005). Time to get a new mountain? The role of function in children's conceptions of natural kinds. Cognition, 97, 325 335.
6. Dunbar, K.N., Fugelsand, J.N. Stein, C. (in press). Do naïve theories ever go away? Using brain and behavior to understand changes in concepts. In I.P. Shah M. Lovett (Eds.), Thinking about data. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
7. Evans, E.M. (2000). Beyond Scopes: Why Creationism is here to stay. In K. Rosengren, C. Johnson P. Harris (Eds.), Imagining the impossible: The development of magical, scientific and religious thinking in contemporary society (pp. 305 333). Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press.
8. Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E. McHugh, P.R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189 198.
9. Gould, S.J. Lewontin, R. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 205, 581 598.
10. Greif, M.L., Kemler Nelson, D.G., Keil, F.C. Gutierrez, F. (2006). What do children want to know about animals and artifacts? Domain-specific requests for information. Psychological Science, 17, 455 459.
11. Keil, F.C. (1992). The origins of an autonomous biology. In M.R. Gunnar M. Maratsos (Eds.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology: Vol. 25. Modularity and constraints in language and cognition (pp. 103 138). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
12. Keil, F.C. (2003). Folkscience: Coarse interpretations of a complex reality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 368 373.
13. Kelemen, D. (1999a). Beliefs about purpose: On the origins of teleological thought. In M. Corballis S. Lea (Eds.), The descent of mind: Psychological perspectives on hominid evolution (pp. 278 294). Oxford, England : Oxford University Press.
14. Kelemen, D. (1999b). Function, goals, and intention: Children's teleological reasoning about objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 461 468.
15. Kelemen, D. (1999c). Why are rocks pointy? Children's preference for teleological explanations of the natural world. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1440 1452.
16. Kelemen, D. (2004). Are children "intuitive theists"?: Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15, 295 301.
17. Kelemen, D. DiYanni, C. (2005). Intuitions about origins: Purpose and intelligent design in children's reasoning about nature. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 3 31.
18. Kelemen, D. Rosset, E. (2007). The human function compunction: Adults' teleo-functional bias. Unpublished manuscript, Boston University.
19. Lombrozo, T. (2006). The structure and function of explanations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 464 470.
20. Lombrozo, T. Carey, S. (2006). Functional explanation and the function of explanation. Cognition, 99, 167 204.
21. Lombrozo, T., Shtulman, A. Weisberg, M. (2006). The Intelligent Design controversy: Lessons from psychology and education. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 56 57.
22. McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M.F., Katzman, R., Price, D. Stadlan, E. (1984). Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Workgroup under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force. Neurology, 34, 939 944.
23. Paley, W. (1998). Natural theology; or, evidence of the existence and attributes of the deity. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Humanities Text Initiative. (Original work published 1802)
24. Pinker, S. Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 707 784.
25. Shtulman, A. (2006). Qualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 170 194.
26. Silveri, M.C., Daniele, A., Giustolisi, L. Gainotti, G. (1991). Dissociation between knowledge of living and non-living things in Dementia of the Alzheimer Type. Neurology, 41, 545 546.
27. Sloman, S., Lombrozo, T. Malt, B. (2007). Ontological commitments and domain-specific categorisation. In M.J. Roberts (Ed.), Integrating the mind (pp. 105 130). Hove, England : Psychology Press.
28. Zaitchik, D., Koff, E., Brownell, H., Winner, E. Albert, M. (2004). Inference of mental states in patients with Alzheimer's Disease. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 9, 301 313.
29. Zaitchik, D., Koff, E., Brownell, H., Winner, E. Albert, M. (2006). Inference of beliefs and emotions in patients with Alzheimer's Disease. Neuropsychology, 20, 11 20.
30. Zaitchik, D. Solomon, G. (2007). Conservation of species, liquid, and belief: Evidence for category-specific conceptual impairment in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Manuscript submitted for publication.
31. Zaitchik, D. Solomon, G. (in press). Animist thinking in the elderly and in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Cognitive Neuropsychology.
32. Zannino, G.D., Perri, R., Carlesimo, G.A., Pasqualetti, P. Caltagirone, C. (2002). Category-specific impairment in patients with Alzheimer's disease as a function of disease severity: A cross-sectional investigation. Neuropsychologia, 40, 268 279.