A morphological approach to documenting the domestication of Chenopodium in the Andes

Documenting Domestication: New Genetic and Archaeological Paradigms

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 32-45

  Bruno, Maria C ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35348963328     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. Aellen, P. and T. Just. 1943. Key and synopsis of the American species of the genus Chenopodium L. American Midland Naturalist 30: 47-76.
2. Aldenderfer, M. S. 1999. The Late Preceramic-Early Formative transition on the South-Central Andean Littoral. In Pacific Latin America in prehistory: The evolution of archaic and formative cultures, Michael Blake (ed.), pp. 213-222. Pullman, Wash.: WSU Press.
3. Anderson, E. 1952. Plants, man, and life. Boston: Little Brown.
4. Asch, D. L. and N. B. Asch. 1977. Chenopod as cultigen: A re-evaluation of some prehistoric collections from eastern North America. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 2: 3-45.
5. Baker, H. G. 1972. The evolution of weeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 5: 1-24.
6. Bastien, J. W. 1987. Healers of the Andes: Kallawaya herbalists and their medicinal plants. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
7. Binford, M. W. and A. L. Kolata. 1996. The natural and human setting. In Tiwanaku and its hinterland: Archaeology and paleoecology of an Andean civilization, A. L. Kolata (ed.), Vol. 1, pp. 57-88. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Press.
8. Boulangé, B. and E. Aquize Jaén. 1981. Morphologie, hydrolographie et climatologie du Lac Titicaca et de son Basin Versant. Revue d'Hydrobiologie Tropicale 14: 269-287.
9. Browman, D. L. 1981. New light on Andean Tiwanaku. American Scientist 69: 408-419.
10. Browman, D. L. 1986. Chenopod cultivation, lacustrine resources, and fuel use at Chiripa, Bolivia. In New world paleoethnobotany: Collected papers in honor of Leonard W. Blake, E. E. Voigt and D. M. Pearsall (eds.), pp. 137-172. The Missouri Archaeologist Vol. 47. Columbia: Missouri Archaeological Society.
11. Bruno, M. C. 2001. Formative agriculture? The status of Chenopodium domestication and intensification at Chiripa, Bolivia (1500 B.C.-100 B.C.). Master's Thesis, Department of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis.
12. Bruno, M. C. and W. T. Whitehead. 2003 Chenopodium cultivation and Formative period agriculture at Chiripa, Bolivia. Latin American Antiquity 14: 339-355.
13. de Wet, J. M. J. 1973. Evolutionary dynamics of cereal domestication. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 102: 307-312.
14. de Wet, J. M. J. and J. R. Harlan. 1975. Weeds and domesticates: Evolution in the man-made habitat. Economic Botany 29: 99-107.
15. Eisentraut, P. J. 1998. Macrobotanical remains from southern Peru: A comparison of Late Archaic-Early Formative period sites from the Puna and Suni zones of the Western Titicaca basin. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Microfilms.
16. Franquemont, C., T. Plowman, E. Franquemont, S. King, C. Niezgoda, W. Davis, and C. Sperling. 1990. The ethnobotany of Chinchero, an Andean community in southern Peru. Fieldiana, Botany No. 24. Chicago: Field Museum of Natural History.
17. Fritz, G. J. and B. D. Smith. 1988. Old collections and new technology: Documenting the domestication of Chenopodium in eastern North America. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 13: 3-27.
18. Gade, D. W. 1970, Ethnobotany of Cañihua (Chenopodium pallidicaule), rustic seed crop of the Altiplano. Economic Botany 24: 55-61.
19. Gandarillas, H. 1974. Genetica y origin de la quinia. La Paz, Bolivia: Instituto Nacional del Trigo, Departmento de Estudios Economicos, Estadisticas y Comercializacion.
20. Gremillion, K. J. 1993a. Crop and weed in prehistoric eastern North America: The Chenopodium example. American Antiquity 58: 496-509.
21. Gremillion, K. J. 1993b. The evolution of seed morphology in domesticated Chenopodium: An archaeological case study. Journal of Ethnobiology 13: 149-169.
22. Harlan, J. R. 1975. Crops and man. Madison, Wisc.: American Society of Agronomy.
23. Harlan, J. R. and J. M. J. de Wet. 1965. Some thoughts on weeds. Economic Botany 19: 16-24.
24. Harlan, J. R., J.M.J. de Wet, and E. G. Price. 1973. Comparative evolution of cereals. Evolution 27: 311-325.
25. Hastorf, C. A. 1999. Introduction to Chiripa and the site area. In Early settlement at Chiripa, Bolivia: Research of the Taraco Archaeological Project, C. A. Hastorf (ed.), pp. 1-6. Contributions of the Archaeological Research Facility No. 57. Berkeley: Archaeological Research Facility, University of California at Berkeley.
26. Hastorf, C. A. 2003. Community with the ancestors: Ceremonies and memory in the Middle Formative at Chiripa, Bolivia. Journal of Anthropological Anthropology 31: 305-332.
27. Heiser, C. B. 1976. Origins of some cultivated new world plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10: 309-326.
28. Heiser, C. B. and D. C. Nelson. 1974. On the origin of cultivated chenopods (Chenopodium). Genetics 78: 503-505.
29. Holzner, W. and M. Numata. 1982. Biology and ecology of weeds. The Hague: Junk.
30. Hunziker, A. 1943. Las especies alimenticias de Amarantus y Chenopodium cultivadas por Los Indios de América. Revista Argentina Agronomica. 10: 146-154.
31. Hunziker, A. 1952. Los pseudocereales de la agricultura indígena de América. Buenos Aires: Acme Agency.
32. Kuznar, L. A. 1993. Mutualism between Chenopodium, herd animals, and herders in the south central Andes. Mountain Research and Development 13: 257-265.
33. La Barre, W. 1948. The Aymara Indians of the Lake Titicaca Plateau, Bolivia. Memoir Series of the American Anthropological Association No. 68. New York: Kraus.
34. La Barre, W. 1959. Materia medica of the aymara Lake Titicaca Plateau, Bolivia. Webbia 15(1): 47-49.
35. Leon, J. 1964. Plantas alimenticias Andinas. Lima, Peru: Instituto Interamericano de Ciencias Agricolas Zona Andina.
36. Mohr-Chavéz, K. L. 1988. The significance of Chiripa in Lake Titicaca Basin developments. Expedition 30: 2, 17-26.
37. National Research Council. 1989. Lost crops of the Incas: Little known plants of the Andes with promise for worldwide cultivation. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
38. Nelson, D. C. 1968. Taxonomy and origins of Chenopodium quinoa and Chenopodium nuttalliae. PhD Dissertation, Indiana University. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Microfilms.
39. Nordstrom, C. 1990. Evidence for the domestication of Chenopodium in the Andes. Report to the National Science Foundation. University of California, Berkeley Paleoethnobotany Laboratory Reports #19.
40. Pearsall, D. M. 1980. Ethnobotanical report: Plant utilization at a hunting base camp. In Prehistoric hunters of the high Andes, John Rick (ed.), pp. 191-231. New York: Academic Press.
41. Pearsall, D. M. 1989. Adaptation of prehistoric hunter-gatherers in the High Andes: The changing role of plant resources. In Foraging and farming, D. Harris and G. Hillman (eds.), pp. 318-332. London: Unwin Hyman.
42. Pearsall, D. M. 1992. Origins of plant cultivation in South America. In The origins of agriculture, C. Cowan and P. J. Watson (eds.), pp. 173-205. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
43. Pearsall, D. M. 1993. Domestication and agriculture in the New World. In The last hunters-first farmers, T. D. Price and A. B. Gebauer (eds.), pp. 157-192. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
44. Pickersgill, B. 1977. Biosystematics of crop-weed complexes. Kulturpflanze 29: 377-388.
45. Ruas, P. M., A. Bonifacio, C. F. Ruas, D. J. Fairbanks, and W. R. Andersen. 1999. Genetic relationship among 19 accessions of six species of Chenopodium L., by Random amplified polymorphic DNA fragments (RAPD). Euphytica 105: 25-32.
46. Sauer, C. O. 1952. Agricultural origins and dispersals. New York: American Geographical Society.
47. Simmonds, N. W. 1965. The grain chenopods of the tropical American highlands. Economic Botany 19: 223-235.
48. Smith, B. D. 1984. Chenopodium as a prehistoric domesticate in eastern North America: Evidence from Russell Cave, Alabama. Science 226: 165-167.
49. Smith, B. D. 1985a. The role of Chenopodium as a domesticate in pre-maize garden systems of the eastern United States. Southeastern Archaeology 4: 51-72.
50. Smith, B. D. 1985b. Chenopodium berlandieri ssp. jonesianum: Evidence for a Hopewellian domesticate from Ash Cave, Ohio. Southeastern Archaeology 4: 107-133.
51. Smith, B. D. 1988. SEM and the identification of micro-morphological indicators of domestication in seed plants. In Scanning electron microscopy in archaeology, S. L. Olsen (ed.), pp. 203-214. BAR International Series 452. Oxford: BAR.
52. Smith, B. D. 1990. Origins of agriculture in eastern North America. Science 246: 1566-1571.
53. Smith, B. D. 1992. The floodplain weed theory of plant domestication in eastern North America. In Rivers of change, by B. D. Smith, pp. 19-33. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
54. Smith, B. D. 1995. Seed plant domestication in eastern North America. In Last hunters-first farmers, T. D. Price and A. B. Gebauer (eds.), pp. 193-213. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
55. Smith, B. D. and C. W. Cowan. 1987. Domesticated Chenopodium in prehistoric eastern North America: New accelerator dates from eastern Kentucky. American Antiquity 52: 355-357.
56. Tapia, M., H. Gandarillas, S. Alandia, A. Cardozo, A. Mujica, R. Ortiz, V. Otazu, J. Rea, and B. Salas. 1979. Quinia y kaniwa cultivos Andinos. Centro Internacional de Investigaciones para El Desarrolo (CIID). Instituto Interamericano de Ciencias Agricolas (IICA). Editorial IICA.
57. Whitehead, W. T. 1999. Paleoethnobotanical evidence. In Early settlement at Chiripa, Bolivia: Research of the Taraco Archaeological Project, C. A. Hastorf (ed.), pp. 95-104. Contributions of the Archaeological Research Facility No. 57. Berkeley: Archaeological Research Facility, University of California at Berkeley.
58. Whitehead, W. T. 2000. Perspectives on agriculture from Formative and Tiwanaku sites in the Bolivian Altiplano. Paper presented at the 65th Annual Meeting of the Society of American Archaeology, Philadelphia, PA, April 7.
59. Wilson, H. D. 1980. Artificial hybridization among species of Chenopodium sect. Chenopodium. Systematic Botany 5: 253-263.
60. Wilson, H. D. 1981. Domesticated Chenopodium of the Ozark Bluff Dwellers. Economic Botany 35: 233-239.
61. Wilson, H. D. 1988a. Allozyme variation and morphological relationships of Chenopodium hircinum. Systematic Botany 13: 215-228.
62. Wilson, H. D. 1988b. Quinua biosystematics: Domesticated populations. Economic Botany 42: 461-477.
63. Wilson, H. D. 1988c. Quinua biosystematics II: Free-living populations. Economic Botany 42: 478-494.
64. Wilson, H. D. 1990. Quinua and relatives (Chenopodium sect. Chenopodium subsect. Cellulata). Economic Botany 44 (Suppl.): 92-110.
65. Wilson, H. D. and C. B. Heiser. 1979. The origin and evolutionary relationships of 'Huauzontle' (Chenopodium nuttalliae Safford), domesticated chenopod of Mexico. American Journal of Botany 66: 198-206.