Overload traffic management for sensor networks

ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2007, Pages

  Wan, Chieh Yih ^a,e   Eisenman, Shane B ^b   Campbell, Andrew T ^c   Crowcroft, Jon ^d  

^a INTEL CORPORATION   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^e INTEL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Simulations; System design; Testbeds

Indexed keywords

FUNNELING EFFECT; MOTE NETWORKS; MOTE RADIO; SIPHONING OFF DATA; TESTBEDS; TRAFFIC LOADS; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONGESTION CONTROL (COMMUNICATION); PACKET LOSS; PATTERN MATCHING; SENSOR NETWORKS;

TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 35348953853     PISSN: 15504859     EISSN: 15504867     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1281492.1281493     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. ARMSTRONG PROJECT 2006. http://comet.columbia.edu/ armstrong.
2. AHORA, A., RAMNATH, R., AND ERTIN, E. 2005. Exscal: Elements of an extreme scale wireless sensor network. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications. Hong Kong. IEEE, 102-108.
3. BASU, A., BOSHES, B., MUKHERJEE, S., AND RAMANATHAN, S. 2004. Network deformation: Traffic-aware algorithms for dynamically reducing end-to-end delay in multi-hop wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. Philadelphia, PA. ACM, 100-113.
4. CHEN, B., JAMIESON, K., BALAKRISHNAN, H., AND MORRIS, R. 2002. Span: An energy-efficient coordination algorithm for topology maintenance in ad hoc wireless networks. ACM Wirel. Netw. 8, 5, 85-96.
5. CHIPCON. 2006. Chipcon CC1000 and CC2420 Data Sheets 2006. http://www.chipcon.com.
6. CLARE, L. P., POTTIE, G., AND AGRE, J. R. 1999. Self-organizing distributed microsensor networks. In Proceedings of 13th Annual International Symposium on Aerospace / Defense Sensing, Simulation, and Controls. Orlando, FL. SPIE, 229-237.
7. DAM, T. V. AND LANGENDOEN, K. 2003. An adaptive energy-efficient mac protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of 1st Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. Los Angeles, ACM, 171-180.
8. DEB, B., BHATNAGAR, S., AND NATH, B. 2003. Multi-resolution state retrieval in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications. Anchorage, Al. IEEE, 19-29.
9. HE, T., BLUM, B. M., STANKOVIC, J. A., AND ABDELZAHER, T. 2004. Aida: Adaptive application- independent data aggregation in wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. 3, 2, 426-457.
10. HILL, J., SZEWCZYK, R., WOO, A., HOLLAR, S., CULLER, D., AND PISTER, K. 2000. System architecture directions for network sensors. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems. Cambridge, ACM, MA, 93-104.
11. HULL, B., JAMIESON, K., AND BALAKRISHNAN, H. 2004. Mitigating congestion in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. Baltimore MA. ACM, 134-147.
12. INTANAGONWIWAT, C., GOVINDAN, R., AND ESTRIN, D. 2000. Directed diffusion: A scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. Boston, MA. ACM, 56-67.
13. LI, J., BLAKE, C., COUTO, D. D., LEE, H., AND MORRIS, R. 2001. Capacity of ad hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. Rome, Italy. ACM, 61-69.
14. LIU, B., LIU, Z., AND TOWSLEY, D. 2003. On the capacity of hybrid wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. San Francisco, CA. IEEE, 1543-1552.
15. MURTY, R., QI, E. H., AND HAZRA, M. 2004. An adaptive approach to wireless network performance optimization.
16. NATH, B. AND NICULESCU, D. 2003. Routing on a curve. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 33, 1, 155-160.
17. NAVAS, J. C. AND IMIELINSKI, T. 1997. Geographic addressing and routing. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. Budapest, Hongary. ACM/IEEE, 66-76.
18. POLASTRE, J., HUI, J., LEVIS, P., ZHAO, J., CULLER, D., SHENKER, S., AND STOICA, I. 2005. A unifying link abstraction for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. San Diego, CA. ACM, 76-89.
19. POLASTRE, J., SZEWCZYK, R., AND CULLER, D. 2005. Telos: Enabling ultra-low power wireless research. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks: Special Track on Platform Tools and Design Methods for Network Embedded Sensors. Los Angeles, CA. ACM/IEEE, 364-369.
20. POWERTOSSIM. 2006. PowerTOSSIM Mica2 Power Benchmarks 2006. http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~shnayder/ptossim/mica2bench/summary.html.
21. RAJENDRAN, V., OBRACZKA, K., AND GARCIA, J. 2003. Energy-efficient, collision-free medium access control for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of 1st Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. Los Angeles, CA. ACM, 181-192.
22. SANKARASUBRAMANIAM, Y., AKAN, O., AND AKYTLDIZ, I. 2003. Event-to-sink reliable transport in wire-less sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing. Annapolis, MA. ACM, 177-188.
23. SHIH, E., BAHL, P., AND SINCLAIR, M. J. 2002. Wake on wireless: An event driven energy saving strategy for battery operated devices. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. Atlanta, CA. ACM, 160-171.
24. STARGATE. 2006. Stargate datasheet 2006. http://www.xbow.com.
25. TILAK, S., ABU-GHAZALEH, N. B., AND HEINZELMAN, W. 2002. Infrastructure tradeoffs for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications. Atlanta, CA. ACM, 49-58.
26. TINYOS. 2006. Tinyoshomepage 2006. http://www.tinyos.net.
27. TOLLE, G. AND CULLER, D. 2005. Design of an application-cooperative managment system for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks. Istanbul, Turkey. IEEE, 121-132.
28. WAN, C.-Y., CAMPBELL, A. T., AND CROWCROPT, J. 2004. A case for all-wireless dual-radio virtual sinks. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. Baltimore, MA. ACM, 267-268.
29. WAN, C.-Y., EISENMAN, S. B., AND CAMPBELL, A. T. 2003. Coda: Congestion detection and avoidance in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. Los Angeles, CA. ACM, 266-279.
30. WAN, C.-Y., EISENMAN, S. B., CAMPBELL, A. T., AND CROWCROFT, J. 2005. Siphon: Overload traffic management using multi-radio virtual sinks. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. San Diego, CA. ACM, 116-129.
31. WOO, A. AND CULLER, D. 2001. A transmission control scheme for media access in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. Rome, Italy. ACM, 221-235.
32. WOO, A. AND CULLER, D. 2003. Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. Los Angeles, CA. ACM, 14-27.
33. XUE, F. AND KUMAR, P. R. 2004. The number of neighbors needed for connectivity of wireless networks. ACM Wirel. Netw. 10, 2, 169-181.
34. YARVIS, M., KUSHALNAGAR, N., SINGH, H., RANGARAJAN, A., LIU, Y., AND SINGH, S. 2005. Exploiting heterogeneity in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 24th International Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Miami, FL. IEEE, 878-890.
35. YE, W., HEIDEMANN, J., AND ESTRIN, D. 2002. An energy efficient mac protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 21st International Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. New York, NY. IEEE, 1567-1576.
36. ZHAO, J. AND GOVINDAN, R. 2003. Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor network. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. Los Angeles, CA. ACM, 1-13.