Corrigendum to "Studies on the relationship between electrogustometry and sour taste perception" [Auris Nasus Larynx 34 (2007) 477-480] (DOI:10.1016/j.anl.2007.03.004);Studies on the relationship between electrogustometry and sour taste perception

Auris Nasus Larynx

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 477-480

  Ellegård, Eva K ^a   Goldsmith, David ^b   Hay, K David ^b   Morton, Randall P ^c  

^a Kungsbacka Hospital   (Sweden)

^b GREEN LANE HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^c Department of Otorhinolaryngology Manukau Super Clinic ^*  (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Electrogustometry; Method; Subjective; Taste; Visual analogue scale

Indexed keywords

SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROGUSTOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOUTH; PERCEPTION; SOUR TASTE PERCEPTION; TONGUE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 35348951974     PISSN: 03858146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2008.04.001     Document Type: Erratum

References (19)

1. Bartoshuk L. Clinical evaluation of the sense of taste. ENT J 68 (1989) 331-337
2. Yamauchi Y., Endo S., Sakai F., and Yoshimura I. A new whole-mouth gustatory test procedure. 1. Thresholds and principal components analysis in healthy men and women. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (2002) 39-48
3. Tsuruoka S., Wakaumi M., Araki N., Ioka T., Sugimoto K., and Fujimura A. Comparative study of taste disturbance by losartan and perindopril in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 45 (2005) 1319-1323
4. Ahne G., Erras A., Hummel T., and Kobal G. Assessment of gustatory function by means of tasting tablets. Laryngoscope 110 (2000) 1396-1401
5. Tomita H., and Ikeda M. Clinical use of electrogustometry: strengths and limitations. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (2002) 27-38
6. Murphy C., Quinonez C., and Nordin S. Reliability and validity of electrogustometry and its application to young and elderly persons. Chem Senses 20 (1995) 499-503
7. Tomofuji S., Sakagami M., Kushida K., Terada T., Mori H., and Kakibuchi M. Taste disturbance after tonsillectomy and laryngomicrosurgery. Auris Nasus Larynx 32 (2005) 381-386
8. Morton R.P., Hay K.D., Goldsmith D.B., and Stillman J.A. Patterns of sensory recovery in the lingual nerve after surgical trauma. N Z Dent J 101 (2005) 53-57
9. Nin T., Sakagami M., Sone-Okunaka M., Muto T., Mishiro Y., and Fukazawa K. Taste function after section of chorda tympani nerve in middle ear surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx 33 (2006) 13-17
10. Ikui A. A review of objective measures of gustatory function. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (2002) 60-68
11. Lindemann B. Taste reception. Physiol Rev 76 (1996) 718-766
12. Stillman J.A., Morton R.P., and Goldsmith D. Automated electrogustometry: a new paradigm for the estimation of taste detection thresholds. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 25 (2000) 120-125
13. Stillman J.A., Morton R.P., Hay K.D., Ahmad Z., and Goldsmith D. Electrogustometry: strengths, weaknesses, and clinical evidence of stimulus boundaries. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 28 (2003) 406-410
14. Lobb B., Elliffe D.M., and Stillman J.A. Reliability of electrogustometry for the estimation of taste thresholds. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 25 (2000) 531-534
15. Salata J., Raj J., and Doty R. Differential sensitivity of tongue areas and palate to electrical stimulation: a suprathreshold cross-modal matching study. Chem Senses 16 (1991) 483-489
16. Grant R., Ferguson M.M., Strang R., Turner J.W., and Bone I. Evoked taste thresholds in a normal population and the application of electrogustometry to trigeminal nerve disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychol 50 (1987) 12-21
17. Ajdukovic D. Electrical taste stimulus: current intensity or current density?. Chem Senses 15 (1990) 341-347
18. Bujas Z. Electrical taste. In: Autrum H., Jung R., Loewenstein W., MacKay D., and Teuber H. (Eds). Handbook of sensory physiology (1971), Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York 180-199
19. Miller S.L., Mirza N., and Doty R.L. Electrogustometric thresholds: relationship to anterior tongue locus, area of stimulation, and number of fungiform papillae. Physiol Behav 75 (2002) 753-757