When policy meets statistics: The very real effect that questionable statistical analysis has on limiting health care access for bariatric surgery

Archives of Surgery

Volumn 142, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 979-987

  Livingston, Edward H ^a   Elliott, Alan C ^a   Hynan, Linda S ^a   Engel, Eli ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BARIATRIC SURGERY; CALCULATION; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HOSPITAL SERVICE; HUMAN; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOM SAMPLE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STATISTICS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION STUDY;

BARIATRIC SURGERY; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; MEDICARE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; OBESITY, MORBID; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 35348951516     PISSN: 00040010     EISSN: 15383644     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.142.10.979     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Web site. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/obesity/ob_home.htm. Published 1998. Accessed July 12, 2007.
2. The Surgeon General's call to action to prevent and decrease overweight and obesity. US Department of Health and Human Services. http://www. surgeongeneral.gov/topics/obesity/calltoaction/CalltoAction.pdf. Published 2001. Accessed July 12, 2007.
3. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening and interventions to prevent obesity in adults. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsobes.htm. Published December 2003. Accessed July 12, 2007.
4. Brechner RJ, Farris C, Harrison S, Tillman K, Salive M, Phurrough S. Summary of evidence - bariatric surgery. www.cms.hhs.gov/FACA/downloads/id26c. pdf. Published November 4, 2004. Accessed July 12, 2007.
5. Prevention and Management of Obesity (Mature Adolescents and Adults). Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement Web site. http://www.icsi.org/ obesity/prevention_and_management_of_obesity__mature_adolescents_and_adults_2. html. Published 2004. Accessed July 12, 2007.
6. Colquitt J, Clegg A, Loveman E, Royle P, Sidhu MK. Surgery for morbid obesity. The Cochrane Collaboration Cochrane Reviews Web site. http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab003641.html. Published 2004. Updated August 15, 2005. Accessed July 12, 2007.
7. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Betsy Lehman Center for Patient Safety and Medical Error Reduction Expert Panel on Weight Loss Surgery. http://www.mass.gov/dph/betsylehman/pdf/executive_report_20040804.pdf. Published August 4, 2004. Accessed July 12, 2007.
8. Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Maglione M, et al. Pharmacological and surgical treatment of obesity. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/obesphsum.pdf. Published July 2004. Accessed July 12, 2007.
9. Bariatric Surgery: health technology literature review. http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/mas/tech/reviews/pdf/ rev_baria_010105.pdf. Published January 2005. Accessed July 12, 2007.
10. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724-1737.
11. ECRI Institute. Bariatric Surgery for Obesity: Technology Assessment Report. Plymouth Meeting, PA: Emergency Care Research Institute; 2005.
12. Hampel H, Abraham NS, El Serag HB. Meta-analysis: obesity and the risk for gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(3):199-211.
13. Tsai AG, Wadden TA. Systematic review: an evaluation of major commercial weight loss programs in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(1):56-66.
14. Livingston EH. Procedure, incidence and complication rates of bariatric surgery in the United States. Am J Surg. 2004;188(2):105-110.
15. Daly L. Simple SAS macros for the calculation of exact binomial and Poisson confidence limits. Comput Biol Med. 1992;22(5):351-361.
16. Livingston EH. Development of bariatric surgery-specific risk assessment tool. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(1):14-20.
17. Singer JD. Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models and individual growth models. J Educ Behav Statistics. 1998;24:323-355.
18. Elliott AC, Woodward WA. Statistical Analysis: Quick Reference Guidebook With SPSS Examples. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007.
19. Flum DR, Salem L, Elrod JA, Dellinger EP, Cheadle A, Chan L. Early mortality among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294(15):1903-1908.
20. Liu JH, Zingmond D, Etzioni DA, et al. Characterizing the performance and outcomes of obesity surgery in California. Am Surg. 2003;69(10):823-828.
21. Courcoulas A, Schuchert M, Gatti G, Luketich J. The relationship of surgeon and hospital volume to outcome after gastric bypass surgery in Pennsylvania: a 3-year summary. Surgery. 2003;134(4):613-621.
22. Nguyen NT, Paya M, Stevens CM, Mavandadi S, Zainabadi K, Wilson SE. The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Ann Surg. 2004;240(4):586-593.
23. Carbonell AM, Lincourt AE, Matthews BD, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford BT. National study of the effect of patient and hospital characteristics on bariatric surgery outcomes. Am Surg. 2005;71(4):308-314.
24. Weller WE, Hannan EL. Relationship between provider volume and postoperative complications for bariatric procedures in New York State. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202(5):753-761.
25. Shahian DM, Normand SL. The volume-outcome relationship: from Luft to Leapfrog. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(3):1048-1058.
26. Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR. Is volume related to outcome in health care? a systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(6):511-520.
27. Livingston EH, Huerta S, Arthur D, Lee S, De Shields S, Heber D. Male gender is a predictor of morbidity and age a predictor of mortality for patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery. Ann Surg. 2002;236(5):576-582.
28. Fernandez AZ Jr, DeMaria EJ, Tichansky DS, et al. Experience with over 3000 open and laparoscopic bariatric procedures: multivariate analysis of factors related to leak and resultant mortality. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(2):193-197.
29. Fernandez AZ Jr, DeMaria EJ, Tichansky DS, et al. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for death following gastric bypass for treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2004;239(5):698-702.
30. Sowden AJ, Deeks JJ, Sheldon TA. Volume and outcome in coronary-artery bypass graft-surgery - true association or artifact. BMJ. 1995;311(6998):151-155.
31. Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR. The risk of determining risk with multivariable models. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(3):201-210.
32. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations - results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1999;230(3):414-429.
33. Parker JP, Li Z, Danielson M, et al. The California Report on Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: 2000-2002 Hospital Data. Sacramento: California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development; 2006.
34. Peterson ED, Coombs LP, DeLong ER, Haan CK, Ferguson TB. Procedural volume as a marker of quality for CABG surgery. JAMA. 2004;291(2):195-201.
35. Shahian DM, Normand SL, Torchiana DF, et al. Cardiac surgery report cards: comprehensive review and statistical critique. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72(6):2155-2168.
36. Shahian DM, Torchiana DF, Shemin RJ, Rawn JD, Normand SL. Massachusetts cardiac surgery report card: implications of statistical methodology. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(6):2106-2113.
37. Christiansen CL, Morris CN. Improving the statistical approach to health care provider profiling. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(8) (pt 2):764-768.
38. Kalant N, Shrier I. Volume and outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: are more and less the same? Can J Cardiol. 2004;20(1):81-86.
39. Panageas KS, Schrag D, Riedel E, Bach PB, Begg CB. The effect of clustering of outcomes on the association of procedure volume and surgical outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(8):658-665.
40. Northup PG, Pruett TL, Stukenborg GJ, Berg CL. Survival after adult liver transplantation does not correlate with transplant center case volume in the MELD era. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(10):2455-2462.
41. Altman DG, Lausen B, Sauerbrei W, Schumacher M. Dangers of using optimal cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86(11):829-835.
42. Hannan EL, Kilburn H, Racz M, Shields E, Chassin MR. Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State. JAMA. 1994;271(10):761-766.
43. Luft HS. Better for whom? policy implications of acting on the relation between volume and outcome in coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(7):1931-1933.
44. Best WR, Khuri SF, Phelan M, et al. Identifying patient preoperative risk factors and postoperative adverse events in administrative databases: results from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;194(3):257-266.
45. Daley J, Khuri SF, Henderson W, et al. Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185(4):328-340.
46. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180(5):519-531.
47. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185(4):315-327.