Role of maximum rate of depolarization in predicting action potential duration during ventricular fibrillation

American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology

Volumn 293, Issue 4, 2007, Pages

  Huang, Jian ^a,e   Cheng, Kang An ^d   Dosdall, Derek J ^c   Smith, William M ^c   Ideker, Raymond E ^a,b,c  

^a University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^c and Radiation Oncology   (United States)

^d PEKING UNION MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (China)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrophysiology

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; DIASTOLE; HEART DEPOLARIZATION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE WALL; HEART REPOLARIZATION; HEART VENTRICLE FIBRILLATION; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MEMBRANE DEPOLARIZATION; MICROELECTRODE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWINE;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; CARDIAC PACING, ARTIFICIAL; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; HEART CONDUCTION SYSTEM; HEART VENTRICLES; LINEAR MODELS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; RESEARCH DESIGN; SWINE; TIME FACTORS; VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION;

EID: 35348934266     PISSN: 03636135     EISSN: 15221539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00793.2007     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. AHA. Position of the American Heart Association on research animal use. Circulation 71: 849A-850A, 1985.
2. Akiyama T. Intracellular recording of in situ ventricular cells during ventricular fibrillation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 240: H465-H471, 1981.
3. Antzelevitch C, Belardinelli L. The role of sodium channel current in modulating transmural dispersion of repolarization and arrhythmogenesis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 17, Suppl 1: S79-S85, 2006.
4. Antzelevitch C, Yan GX. Cellular and ionic mechanisms responsible for the Brugada syndrome. J Electrocardiol 33, Suppl: 33-39, 2000.
5. Bass O, McGuigan JAS. Electrical activity and excitation- contraction coupling in mammalian ventricular muscle. Basic Res Cardiol 70: 585-595, 1975.
6. Beeler GW, Reuter H. Reconstruction of the action potential of ventricular myocardial fibres. J Physiol 268: 177-210, 1977.
7. Boyett MR, Jewell BR. A study of the factors responsible for rate-dependent shortening of the action potential in mammalian ventricular muscle. J Physiol 285: 359-380, 1978.
8. Choi BR, Liu T, Salama G. Adaptation of cardiac action potential durations to stimulation history with random diastolic intervals. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 15: 1188-1197, 2004.
9. Cohen CJ, Fozzard HA, Sheu SS. Increase in intracellular sodium ion activity during stimulation in mammalian cardiac muscle. Circ Res 50: 651-662, 1982.
10. Comtois P, Vinet A. Stability and bifurcation in an integral-delay model of cardiac reentry including spatial coupling in repolarization. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 68: 051903, 2003.
11. i overloaded cardiac myocytes: a simulation study. Biophys J 78: 2392-2404, 2000.
12. Garfinkel A, Kim YH, Voroshilovsky O, Qu Z, Kil JR, Lee MH, Karagueuzian HS, Weiss JN, Chen PS. Preventing ventricular fibrillation by flattening cardiac restitution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 6061-6066, 2000.
13. Hiramatsu Y, Buchanan JW Jr, Knisley SB, Koch GG, Kropp S, Gettes LS. Influence of rate-dependent cellular uncoupling on conduction change during simulated ischemia in guinea pig papillary muscles: effect of verapamil. Circ Res 65: 95-102, 1989.
14. Huang J, Rogers JM, Kenknight BH, Rollins DL, Smith WM, Ideker RE. Evolution of the organization of epicardial activation patterns during ventricular fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 9: 1291-1304, 1998.
15. Huang J, Rogers JM, Killingsworth CR, Singh KP, Smith WM, Ideker RE. Evolution of activation patterns during long-duration ventricular fibrillation in dogs. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 286: H1193-H1200, 2004.
16. Huang J, Zhou X, Smith WM, Ideker RE. Restitution properties during ventricular fibrillation in the in situ swine heart. Circulation 110: 3161-3167, 2004.
17. Hunter PJ, McNaughton PA, Noble D. Analytical models of propagation in excitable cells. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 30: 99-144, 1975.
18. Karma A. Electrical alternans and spiral wave breakup in cardiac tissue. Chaos 4: 461-472, 1994.
19. Katz AM. The cardiac action potential. In: Physiology of the Heart, edited by Katz AM. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001, p. 478-516.
20. Kim YH, Garfinkel A, Ikeda T, Wu TJ, Athill CA, Weiss JN, Karagueuzian HS, Chen PS. Spatiotemporal complexity of ventricular fibrillation revealed by tissue mass reduction in isolated swine right ventricle. Further evidence for the quasiperiodic route to chaos hypothesis. J Clin Invest 100: 2486-2500, 1997.
21. 2+ exchange in mitochondrial dysfunction in astrocytes following in vitro ischemia. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 292: C1113-C1122, 2007.
22. Koller ML, Riccio ML, Gilmour RF Jr. Dynamic restitution of action potential duration during electrical alternans and ventricular fibrillation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 275: H1635-H1642, 1998.
23. Lee MH, Qu Z, Fishbein GA, Lamp ST, Chang EH, Ohara T, Voroshilovsky O, Kil JR, Hamzei AR, Wang NC, Lin SF, Weiss JN, Garfinkel A, Karagueuzian HS, Chen PS. Patterns of wave break during ventricular fibrillation in isolated swine right ventricle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281: H253-H265, 2001.
24. Pertsov AM, Davidenko JM, Salomonsz R, Baxter WT, Jalife J. Spiral waves of excitation underlie reentrant activity in isolated cardiac muscle. Circ Res 72: 631-650, 1993.
25. Riccio ML, Koller ML, Gilmour RF Jr. Electrical restitution and spatiotemporal organization during ventricular fibrillation. Circ Res 84: 955-963, 1999.
26. Rosen MR. What is cardiac memory? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 11: 1289-1293, 2000.
27. Rosenbaum DS, Jackson LE, Smith JM, Garan H, Ruskin JN, Cohen RJ. Electrical alternans and vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med 330: 235-241, 1994.
28. Smith JM, Clancy EA, Valeri CR, Ruskin JN, Cohen RJ. Electrical alternans and cardiac electrical instability. Circulation 77: 110-121, 1988.
29. van Echteld CJ, Kirkels JH, Eijgelshoven MH, van der Meer P, Ruigrok TJ. Intracellular sodium during ischemia and calcium-free perfusion: a 23Na NMR study. J Mol Cell Cardiol 23: 297-307, 1991.
30. iNa in positive force-frequency staircase in guinea pig papillary muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 255: C798-C807, 1988.
31. Weiss JN, Garfinkel A, Karagueuzian HS, Qu Z, Chen PS. Chaos and the transition to ventricular fibrillation: a new approach to antiarrhythmic drug evaluation. Circulation 99: 2819-2826, 1999.
32. Yashima M, Kim YH, Armin S, Wu TJ, Miyauchi Y, Mandel WJ, Chen PS, Karagueuzian HS. On the mechanism of the probabilistic nature of ventricular defibrillation threshold. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 284: H249-H255, 2003.
33. Zhou X, Guse P, Wolf PD, Rollins DL, Smith WM, Ideker RE. Existence of both fast and slow channel activity during the early stage of ventricular fibrillation. Circ Res 70: 773-786, 1992.
34. Zhou XH, Knisley SB, Wolf PD, Rollins DL, Smith WM, Ideker RE. Prolongation of repolarization time by electric field stimulation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in open-chest dogs. Circ Res 68: 1761-1767, 1991.
35. Zygmunt AC, Eddlestone GT, Thomas GP, Nesterenko VV, Antzelevitch C. Larger late sodium conductance in M cells contributes to electrical heterogeneity in canine ventricle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281: H689-H697, 2001.