Stomatal regulation of photosynthesis in apple leaves: Evidence for different water-use strategies between two cultivars

Annals of Botany

Volumn 100, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1347-1356

  Massonnet, Catherine ^a   Costes, Evelyne ^a   Rambal, Serge ^b   Dreyer, Erwin ^c   Regnard, Jean Luc ^a  

^a MONTPELLIER SUPAGRO   (France)

^b CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

^c LERFoB   (France)

Author keywords

Apple; Carbon isotope discrimination; Irradiance; Leaf nitrogen; Leaf temperature; Malus x domestica; Modelling; Photosynthesis; Stomata; Transpiration; Vapour pressure deficit; Water use efficiency

Indexed keywords

CARBON; NITROGEN; WATER;

CULTIVAR; DECIDUOUS TREE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; LEAF; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; TRANSPIRATION; VAPOR PRESSURE; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

APPLE; ARTICLE; CYTOLOGY; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; METABOLISM; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TEMPERATURE;

CARBON ISOTOPES; MALUS; NITROGEN; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TEMPERATURE; WATER;

LONCHOCARPUS CAPASSA; MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 35348932226     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcm222     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Atkinson CJ, Policarpo M, Webster AD, Kingswell G. 2000. Drought tolerance of clonal Malus determined from measurements of stomatal conductance and leaf water potential. Tree Physiology 20: 557-563.
2. Berry J, Bjorkman O. 1980. Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 31: 491-543.
3. 13C and ring width in maritime pine. Plant, Cell and Environment 25: 945-953.
4. Brendel O, Le Thiec D, Scotti-Saintagne C, Bodénès C, Kremer A, Guehl JM. 2007. Quantitative trait loci controlling water use efficiency and related traits in Quercus robur L. Tree Genetics & Genomes. doi: 10.1007/s11295-007-0107-z.
5. Casasoli M, Derory J, Morera-Dutrey C, Brendel O, Porth I, Guehl JM, et al. 2006. Comparison of quantitative trait loci for adaptive traits between oak and chestnut based on an expressed sequence tag consensus map. Genetics 172: 533-546.
6. Comstock JP, Ehleringer JR. 1992. Correlating genetic variation in carbon isotopic composition with complex climatic gradients. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 89: 7747-7751.
7. Costes E, Sinoquet H, Kelner JJ, Godin C. 2003. Exploring within-tree architectural development of two apple tree cultivars over 6 years. Annals of Botany 91: 91-104.
8. DeJong TM, Doyle JF. 1985. Seasonal relationships between leaf nitrogen content (photosynthetic capacity) and leaf canopy light exposure in peach (Prunus persica). Plant, Cell and Environment 8: 701-706.
9. Dragoni D, Lakso AN, Piccioni RM. 2004. Transpiration of an apple orchard in a cool humid climate: measurement and modeling. Acta Horticulturae 664: 175-180.
10. Dreyer E, Le Roux X, Montpied P, Daudet FA, Masson FA. 2001. Temperature response of leaf photosynthetic capacity in seedlings from seven temperate tree species. Tree Physiology 21: 223-232.
11. 2 transfer conductance into the Farquhar-von Caemmerer-Berry leaf photosynthesis model. Plant, Cell and Environment 27: 137-153.
12. Evans JR, von Caemmerer S. 1996. Carbon dioxide diffusion inside leaves. Plant Physiology 110: 339-346.
13. Fanjul L, Jones HG. 1982. Rapid stomatal responses to humidity. Planta 154: 135-138.
14. Farquhar GD, Richards RA. 1984. Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use efficiency of wheat genotypes. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 11: 539-552.
15. 3 species. Planta 149: 78-90.
16. Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT. 1989. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 40: 503-537.
17. Flore JA, Lakso AN. 1989. Environmental and physiological regulation of photosynthesis in fruit crops. Horticultural Reviews 11: 229-287.
18. Francesconi AHD, Lakso AN, Denning SS. 1997. Light and temperature effects on whole-canopy net carbon dioxide exchange rates of apple trees. Acta Horticulturae 451: 287-294.
19. Gindaba J, Wand SJE. 2007. Climate-ameliorating measures influence photosynthetic gas exchange of apple tree. Annals of Applied Biology 150: 75-80.
20. Glenn DM, Puterka GJ, Drake SR, Unruh TR, Knight AL, Baherle P, Prado E, Baugher TA. 2001. Particle film application influences apple leaf physiology, fruit yield, and fruit quality. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 126: 175-181.
21. Grassi G, Meir P, Cromer R, Tompkins D, Jarvis PG. 2002. Photosynthetic parameters in seedlings of Eucalyptus grandis as affected by rate of nitrogen supply. Plant, Cell and Environment 25: 1677-1688.
22. Guehl JM, Nguyen-Queyrens A, Loustau D, Ferhi A. 1995. Genetic and environmental determinants of water use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in forest trees. In: Sandermann H, Bonnet-Masimbert M, eds. EUROSILVA Contribution to Forest Tree Physiology. Paris: INRA, 297-321.
23. 2. Plant, Cell and Environment 15: 271-282.
24. Jarvis PG. 1976. The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B 273: 593-610.
25. Jones HG. 1985. Partitioning stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to photosynthesis. Plant, Cell and Environment 8: 95-104.
26. Jones HG. 1998. Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpiration. Journal of Experimental Botany 49 (special issue): 387-398.
27. Lakso AN. 1979. Seasonal changes in stomatal response to leaf water potential in apple Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 104: 58-60.
28. Lakso AN. 1994. Apple. In: Schaffer B, Andersen PC, eds. Handbook of environmental physiology of fruit crops. Boca Raton, FL: University of Florida/CRC Press, 3-35.
29. Lauri PE, Lespinasse JM. 2000. The vertical axis and solaxe systems in France. Acta Horticulturae 513: 287-296.
30. Le Roux X, Grand S, Dreyer E, Daudet FA. 1999. Parameterization and testing of a biochemically based photosynthesis model for walnut (Juglans regia L.) trees and seedlings. Tree Physiology 19: 481-492.
31. Le Roux X, Walcroft AS, Daudet FA, Sinoquet H, Chaves MM, Rodrigues A, Osorio L. 2001. Photosynthetic light acclimation in peach leaves: importance of changes in mass:area ratio, nitrogen concentration, and leaf nitrogen partitioning. Tree Physiology 21: 377-386.
32. Lespinasse Y. 1992. Le pommier. In: Gallais A, Bannerot H, eds. Amélioration des espèces végétales cultivées. Paris: INRA, 579-594.
33. max. Journal of Experimental Botany 48: 345-347.
34. Leuning R, Kelliher FM, de Pury DGG, Schulze ED. 1995. Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, conductance and transpiration: scaling from leaves to canopies. Plant, Cell and Environment 18: 1183-1200.
35. Li F, Cohen S, Naor A, Shaozong K, Erez A. 2002. Studies of canopy structure and water use of apple trees on three rootstocks. Agricultural Water Management 55: 1-14.
36. Marini RP, Sowers DL. 1990. Net photosynthesis, specific leaf weight, and flowering of peach as influenced by shade. HortScience 25: 331-334.
37. Massonnet C. 2004. Variabilité architecturale et fonctionnelle du système aérien chez le pommier (Malus x domestica Borkh.): comparaison de quatre cultivars par une approche de modélisation structure-fonction. PhD Thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure Agronomique, Montpellier, France.
38. Massonnet C, García-Villanueva E, Costes E, Regnard JL. 2004. Integrating apple tree aerial and root architecture in a structure-function approach. Acta Horticulturae 636: 601-608.
39. Mediavilla S, Escudero A. 2004. Stomatal responses to drought of mature trees and seedlings of two co-occurring Mediterranean oaks. Forest Ecological Management 187: 281-294.
40. Mitchell KA, Bolstad PV, Vose JM. 1999. Interspecific and environmentally induced variation in foliar dark respiration among eighteen southeastern deciduous tree species. Tree Physiology 19: 861-870.
41. Oren R, Sperry JS, Katul GG, Pataki DE, Ewers BE, Phillips N, Schafer KVR. 1999. Survey and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant, Cell and Environment 22: 1515-1526.
42. Pretorius JJB, Wand SJE. 2003. Late-season stomatal sensitivity to microclimate is influenced by sink strength and soil moisture stress in 'Braestar' apple trees in South Africa. Scientia Horticulturae 98: 1-15.
43. Quilot B, Génard M, Kervella J, Lescourret F. 2002. Ecophysiological analysis of genotypic variation in peach fruit growth. Journal of Experimental Botany 53: 1613-1625.
44. Regnard JL, Ducrey M, Porteix E, Segura V, Costes E. 2007. Phenotyping apple progeny for ecophysiological traits: how and what for? 27th International Horticultural Congress, Séoul, Korea. Acta Horticulturae, in press.
45. Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS, Vose JM, Volin JC, Gresham C, Bowman WD. 1998. Relationships of leaf dark respiration to leaf nitrogen, specific leaf area and leaf life-span: a test across biomes and functional groups. Oecologia 114: 471-482.
46. Schulze ED. 1986. Carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange in response to drought in the atmosphere and in the soil. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 37: 247-274.
47. Seeley EJ, Kammereck R. 1977. Carbon flux in apple trees: the effects of temperature and light intensity on photosynthetic rates. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 102: 731-733.
48. Stewart JB. 1988. Modelling surface conductance of pine forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 43, 19-35.
49. Tardieu F. 2003. Virtual plants: modelling as a tool for the genomics of tolerance to water deficit. Trends in Plant Science 8: 9-14.
50. Urban L, Le Roux X, Sinoquet H, Jaffuel S, Jannoyer M. 2003. A biochemical model of photosynthesis for mango leaves: evidence for the effect of fruit on photosynthetic capacity of nearby leaves. Tree Physiology 23: 289-300.
51. Urban L, Lu P, Thibaud R. 2004. Inhibitory effect of flowering and early fruit growth on leaf photosynthesis in mango. Tree Physiology 24: 387-399.
52. Walcroft A, Le Roux X, Diaz-Espejo A, Dones N, Sinoquet H. 2002. Effects of crown development on leaf irradiance, leaf morphology and photosynthetic capacity in a peach tree. Tree Physiology 22: 929-938.
53. Warren CR, Adams MA. 2006. Internal conductance does not scale with photosynthetic capacity: implications for carbon isotope discrimination and the economics of water and nitrogen use in photosynthesis. Plant, Cell and Environment 29: 192-201.
54. 2: results from two independent approaches. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 3057-3067.
55. Warrit B, Landsberg JJ, Thorpe MR. 1980. Responses of apple leaf stomata to environmental factors. Plant, Cell and Environment 3: 13-22.
56. Watson RL, Landsberg JJ, Thorpe MR. 1978. Photosynthetic characteristics of the leaves of Golden delicious apple trees. Plant, Cell and Environment 1: 51-58.
57. Winkel T, Rambal S. 1990. Stomatal conductance of some grapevines growing in the field under a Mediterranean environment. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology 51: 107-121.
58. i curves from 109 species. Journal of Experimental Botany 44: 907-920.
59. Wünsche JN, Palmer JW, Greer DH. 2000. Effects of crop load on fruiting and gas-exchange characteristics of 'Braeburn'/M.26 apple trees at full canopy Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 125: 93-99.