Operator amenability of the fourier algebra in the cb-multiplier norm

Canadian Journal of Mathematics

Volumn 59, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 966-980

  Forrest, Brian E ^a   Runde, Volker ^b   Spronk, Nico ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cb multiplier norm; Fourier algebra; Operator amenability; Weak amenability

Indexed keywords

EID: 35348929435     PISSN: 0008414X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4153/CJM-2007-041-9     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. O. Yu. Aristov, Biprojective algebras and operator spaces. J. Math. Sci. (New York) 111(2002), no. 2, 3339-3386.
2. O. Yu. Aristov, V. Runde, and N. Spronk, Operator biflatness of the Fourier algebra and approximate indicators for subgroups. J. Funct. Anal. 209(2004), no. 2, 367-387.
3. W. G. Bade, P. C. Curtis, Jr., and H. G. Dales, Amenability and weak amenability for Beurling and Lipschitz algebras. Proc. London Math. Soc. 55(1987), no. 2, 359-377.
4. D. Blecher and C. Le Merdy, Operator Algebras and Their Modules - An Operator Space Approach. London Mathematical Society Monographs 30, Clarendon Press, 2004.
5. M. Cowling and U. Haagerup, Completely bounded multipliers of the Fourier algebra of a simple Lie group of real rank one. Invent. Math. 96(1989), no. 3, 507-549.
6. H. G. Dales, Banach Algebras and Automatic Continuity. London Mathematical Society Monographs 24, Clarendon Press, New York, 2000.
7. H. G. Dales, F. Ghahramani, and A. Ya. Helemskiii&caron, The amenability of measure algebras. J. London Math. Soc. 66(2002), no. 1, 213-226.
8. K. R. Davidson, C* -Algebras by Example. Fields Institute Monographs 6, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1996.
9. J. de Cannière and U. Haagerup, Multipliers of the Fourier algebras of some simple Lie groups and their discrete subgroups. Amer. J. Math. 107(1985), no. 2, 455-500.
10. n, n ≥ 2, has no multiplier bounded approximate unit. Math. Ann. 297(1993), no. 4, 707-724.
11. _, Weak amenability and semidirectproducts in simple Lie groups. Math. Ann. 306(1996), no. 4, 737-742.
12. E. G. Effros and Z.-J. Ruan, Operator Spaces. London Mathematical Society Monographs 23, Clarendon Press, New York, 2000.
13. P. Eymard, L'algèbre de Fourier d'un groupe localement compact. Bull. Soc. Math. France 92(1964), 181-236.
14. B. E. Forrest, Some Banach algebras without discontinuous derivations. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 114(1992), no. 4, 965-970.
15. _, Completely bounded multipliers and ideals in A(G) vanishing on closed subgroups. In: Banach Algebras and Their Applications. Contemp. Math. 363, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004, pp. 89-94.
16. B. E. Forrest, E. Kaniuth, A. T.-M. Lau, and N. Spronk, Ideals with bounded approximate identities in Fourier algebras. J. Funct. Anal. 203(2003), no. 1, 286-304.
17. B. E. Forrest and V. Runde, Amenability and weak amenability of the Fourier algebra. Math. Z. 250(2005), no. 4, 731-744.
18. B. E. Forrest and P. J. Wood, Cohomology and the operator space structure of the Fourier algebra and its second dual. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 50(2001), no. 3, 1217-1240.
19. U. Haagerup and J. Kraus, Approximation properties for group C*-algebras and group von Neumann algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 344(1994), no. 2, 667-699.
20. A. Ya. Helemskiǐ, The Homology of Banach and Topological Algebras. (translated from the Russian), Mathematics and its Applications (Soviet Series) 41, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989.
21. _, Some aspects of topological homology since 1995: a survey. In: Banach Algebras and Their Applications. Contemp. Math. 363, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004, pp. 145-179.
22. M. Ilie and N. Spronk, Completely bounded homomorphisms of the Fourier algebras. J. Funct. Anal. 225(2005), no. 2, 480-499.
23. B. E. Johnson, Cohomology in Banach algebras. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society 127, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1972.
24. _, Weak amenability of group algebras. Bull. London Math. Soc. 23(1991), no. 3, 281-284.
25. _, Non-amenability of the Fourier algebra of a compact group. J. London Math. Soc. 50(1994), no. 2, 361-374.
26. E. Kaniuth and A. T.-M. Lau, Spectral synthesis A(G) and for subspaces of VN(G). Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 129(2001), no. 11, 3253-3263.
27. A. Lambert, M. Neufang, and V. Runde, Operator space structure and amenability for Figà-Talamanca-Herz algebras. J. Funct. Anal. 211(2004), no. 1, 245-269.
28. H. Leptin, Sur l'algèbre de Fourier d'un groupe localement compact. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A-B 266(1968), A1180-A1182.
29. R. J. Loy, C. J. Read, V. Runde, and G. A. Willis, Amenable and weakly amenable Banach algebras with compact multiplication. J. Funct. Anal. 171(2000), no. 1, 78-114.
30. Z.-J. Ruan, The operator amenability of A(G). Amer. J. Math. 117(1995), no. 6, 1449-1474.
31. V. Runde, Lectures on Amenability. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1774, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002.
32. _, Amenability for dual Banach algebras. Studia Math. 148(2001), no. 1, 47-66.
33. _, Connes-amenability and normal, virtual diagonals for measure algebras. I. J. London Math. Soc. 67(2003), no. 3, 643-656.
34. _, Dual Banach algebras: Connes-amenability, normal, virtual diagonals, and injectivity of the predual bimodule. Math. Scand. 95(2004), no. 1, 124-144.
35. _, Applications of operator spaces to abstract harmonic analysis. Expo. Math. 22(2004), no. 4, 317-363.
36. _, The amenability constant of the Fourier algebra. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 134(2006), no. 5, 1473-1481 (electronic).
37. V. Runde and N. Spronk, Operator amenability of Fourier-Stieltjes algebras. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 136(2004), no. 3, 675-686.
38. N. Spronk, Operator weak amenability of the Fourier algebra. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 130(2002), no. 12, 3609-3617.
39. _, Measurable Schur multipliers and completely bounded multipliers of the Fourier algebras. Proc. London Math. Soc. 89(2004), no. 1, 161-192.
40. P. J. Wood, Complemented ideals in the Fourier algebra of a locally compact group. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 128(2000), no. 2, 445-451.
41. _, The operator biprojectivity of the Fourier algebra. Canad. J. Math. 54(2002), no. 5, 1100-1120.