Repetition blindness is immune to the central bottleneck

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 729-734

  Dux, Paul E ^a   Marois, René ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35348924441     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196829     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. ARNELL, K. M., & DUNCAN, J. (2002). Shared and separate sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 105-147.
2. BRAINARD, D. H. (1997). The Psyche-physics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
3. CARRIER, L. M., & PASHLER, H. (1995). Attentional limits in memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1339-1348.
4. CHUN, M. M. (1997). Types and tokens in visual processing: A double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 738-755.
5. CHUN, M. M., & POTTER, M. C (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 109-127.
6. FAGOT, C., & PASHLER, H. (1995). Repetition blindness: Perception or memory failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 275-292.
7. GRANDISON, T. D., GHIRARDELLI, T. G., & EGETH, H. E. (1997). Beyond similarity: Masking of the target is sufficient to cause the attentional blink Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 266-274.
8. JIANG, Y., & CHUN, M. M. (2001). The influence of temporal selection on spatial selection and distractor interference: An attentional blink study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 664-679.
9. JOHNSTON, J. C., HOCHHAUS, L., & RUTHRUFF, E. (2002). Repetition blindness has a perceptual locus: Evidence from online processing of targets in RSVP streams. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 477-489.
10. 1 decisions. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1014-1032.
11. JOLICŒUR, P., DELL'ACQUA, R., & CREBOLDER, J. M. (2001). The attentional blink bottleneck. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention: Temporal constraints in human information processing (pp. 82-99). New York: Oxford University Press.
12. KANWISHER, N. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
13. LUCK, S. J., & VOGEL, E. K. (2001). Multiple sources of interference in dual-task performance: The cases of the attentional blink and the psychological refractory period. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention: Temporal constraints in human information processing (pp. 124-140). New York: Oxford University Press.
14. MAROIS, R., CHUN, M. M., & GORE, J. C (2004). A common parietofrontal network is recruited under both low visibility and high perceptual interference conditions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 2985-2992.
15. MAROIS, R., & IVANOFF, J. G. (2005). Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 296-305.
16. MCLAUGHLIN, E. N., SHORE, D. I., & KLEIN, R. M. (2001). The attentional blink is immune to masking-induced data limits. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54 A, 169-196.
17. MORRIS, A. L., & HARRIS, C. L. (2004). Repetition blindness: Out of sight or out of mind? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 913-922.
18. NETLL, W. T., NEELY, J. H., HUTCHISON, K. A., KAHAN, T. A., & VERWYS, C A. (2002). Repetition blindness, forward and backward. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 137-149.
19. PASHLER, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
20. PASHLER, H. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. PASHLER, H., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19-45.
22. PELLI, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
23. RAYMOND, J. E., SHAPIRO, K. L., & ARNELL, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 849-860.
24. RUTHRUFF, E., MILLER, J., & LACHMANN, T. (1995). Does mental rotation require central mechanisms? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 552-570.
25. RUTHRUFF, E., & PASHLER, H. (2001). Perceptual and central interference in dual-task performance. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention: Temporal constraints in human information processing (pp. 100-123). New York: Oxford University Press.
26. SCHWEICKERT, R. (1985). Separable effects of factors on speed and accuracy: Memory scanning, lexical decision, and choice tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 530-546.
27. SEIFFERT, A., & DI LOLLO, V. (1997). Low-level masking in the attentional blink Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1061-1073.
28. SERGENT, C., & DEHAENE, S. (2004). Is consciousness a gradual phenomenon? Evidence for an all-or-none bifurcation during the attentional blink. Psychological Science, 15, 720-728.
29. SHAPIRO, K. L., RAYMOND, J. E., & ARNELL, K. M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 357-371.
30. TELFORD, C. W. (1931). The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 1-36.
31. WARD, R., DUNCAN, J., & SHAPIRO, K. (1997). Effects of similarity, difficulty, and nontarget presentation on the time course of visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 593-600.