Towards a model of information aesthetics in information visualization

Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Visualisation

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 87-92

  Lau, Andrea ^a   Moere, Andrew Vande ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Aesthetics; Information aesthetics; Information visualization; Visualization art

Indexed keywords

CONFORMAL MAPPING; DATA STRUCTURES; DATABASE SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

INFORMATION AESTHETICS; INFORMATION VISUALIZATION; VISUALIZATION ART;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 35348923104     PISSN: 10939547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IV.2007.114     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. S. Card, J. D. Mackinlay and B. Shneiderman. (1999). Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA.
2. C. Ware. (2000). Information Visualization: Design for Perception. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco.
3. W. S. Cleveland and R. McGill. (1984). Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods. J. Am. Stat. Assc. 79(387): 531-554.
4. J. Mackinlay. (1986). Automating the Design of Graphical Presentations of Relational Information. ACM Trans. Graph. 5(2): 110-141.
5. G. Judelman. (2004). Aesthetics and Inspiration for Visualization Design: Bridging the Gap between Art and Science. In International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV), London, UK, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 245-250.
6. D. F. Keefe, D. B. Karlitz, E. L. Vote and D. H. Laidlaw. (2005). Artistic Collaboration in Designing VR Visualisations. IEEE Comp. Graph. andAppl. 25(2): 18-23.
7. A. Vande Moere. (2005). Form Follows Data: the Symbiosis between Design & Information Visualization. In International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design (CAADFutures), Vienna, Austria, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 167-176.
8. L. Manovich. (2000). Info-aesthetics, http://www.manovich.net/IA/. accessed March 2004.
9. C. Chen. (2005). Top 10 Unsolved Information Visualization Problems. IEEE Comp. Graph. & Appl. 25(4): 12-16.
10. J. Mankoff, A. K. Dey, G. Hsieh, J. Kientz, S. Lederer and M. Ames. (2003). Heuristic Evaluation of Ambient Displays. In CHI 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA, ACM Press. pp. 169-176.
11. H. C. Purchase. (2002). Metrics for Graph Drawing Aesthetics. J. Vis. Lang. & Comp. 13(5): 501-516.
12. Y. Liu. (2003). Engineering Aesthetics and Aesthetic Ergonomics: Theoretical Foundations and a Dual-process Research Methodology. Ergonomics. 46(13/14): 1273-1292.
13. R. Picard. (1999). Affective Computing for HCI. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Munich, Germany, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp. 829 -833.
14. B. Laurel. (1993). Computers as Theatre. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.
15. D. A. Norman. (1998). The Design of Everyday Things. MIT Press, London.
16. R. Scha and R. Bod. (1993). Computational Esthetics. Informatie en Informatiebeleid. 11(1): 54-63.
17. K. Boehner, P. Sengers, Y. Medynskiy and G. Gay. (2005). Opening the Frame of the Art Museum: Technology Between Art and Tool. In Digital Arts and Culture (DAC), Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 123-132.
18. R. Lengler and M. J. Eppler. (2007). Towards A Periodic Table of Visualization Methods for Management. In Proceedings of Graphics and Visualization in Engineering (GVE 2007), Clearwater, Florida, USA, ACTA Press. pp.
19. M. Tory and T. Möller. (2004). Rethinking Visualization: A High-Level Taxonomy. In Information Visualization (INFOVIS), Austin, Texas, USA, IEEE Computer Society. pp. 151-158.
20. G. L. Lohse, K. Biolsi, N. Walker and H. H. Rueter. (1994). A Classification of Visual Representations. Commun. ACM. 37(12): 36-49.
21. B. Shneiderman. (1996). The Eyes Have It: A Task by Data Type Taxonomy for Information Visualization. In Symposium on Visual Languages, Boulder, CO, USA, IEEE Computer Society. pp. 336-343.
22. S. Wehrend and C. Lewis. (1990). A Problem-Oriented Classification of Visualization Techniques. In Visualization (VIS), San Francisco, California, IEEE Computer Society. pp. 139-143.
23. W. W. Gaver, J. Beaver and S. Benford. (2003). Ambiguity as a Resource for Design. In Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA, ACM Press. pp. 233-240.