TRISO-model: A new approach to integrated software process assessment and improvement

Software Process Improvement and Practice

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 387-398

  Li, Mingshu ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF SOFTWARE   (China)

Author keywords

Integrated software development; Software process assessment; Software process improvement; TRISO model

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

INTEGRATED SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; SOFTWARE PROCESS ASSESSMENT; SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 35348918728     PISSN: 10774866     EISSN: 10991670     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/spip.339     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Belkhatir N, Estublier J, Melo WL. 1991. Software process modeling in adele: the ISPW-7 example. In Proceedings of the 7th International Software Process Workshop, CA, USA, 48-50.
2. Belkhatir N, Estublier J, Melo W. 1994. Adele/Tempo: an environment to support process modeling and enaction. In Software Process Modelling and Technology, Finkelstein A, Kramer J, Nuseibeh B, (eds). John Wiley and Sons Inc: New York, USA, 187-217.
3. Boehm B. 2005. Value-based software engineering: overview and agenda. In Value-based Software Engineering, Biffl S, Aurum A, Boehm B, Erdogmus H, Grunbacher P, (eds). Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 3-14.
4. Boehm B, Port D. 2001. Balancing discipline and flexibility with the spiral model and MBASE. Crosstalk 11(12): 23-28.
5. Boehm B, Jain A. 2006. A value-based software process framework. In Software Process Change, SPW/ProSim2006 (held in Shanghai, China, May 20-21, 2006), Wang Q, Pfahl D, Raffo DM, Wernick P (eds). LNCS 3966, Springer-Verlag: 1-10.
6. Boehm B, Abts A, Brown A, Chulani S, Clark B, Horowitz E, Madachy R, Reifer D, Steece B. 2000. Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II. Prentice-Hall: NJ, USA.
7. Chrissis MB, Konrad M, Shrum S. 2003. CMMI: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA.
8. CMU SEI. 1994. The Capability Maturity Model Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. Addison-Wesley, Pearson Education: Boston, MA, USA.
9. Curtis B, Hefley W, Miller S. 2001. People Capability Maturity Model. Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA.
10. Estublier J. 2005. Software are processes too. In Unifying the Software Process Spectrum, SPW2005 (held in Beijing, China, May 25-27, 2005), Li M, Boehm B, Osterweil LJ (eds). LNCS 3840, Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 25-34.
11. Florac WA, Carleton AD. 1999. Measuring Software Process-statistical Process Control for Software Process Improvement. Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA.
12. Gray E, Sampaio A, Benediktsson O. 2005. An incremental approach to software process assessment and improvement. Software Quality Journal 13: 7-16.
13. Humphrey WS. 1997. Introduction to the Personal Software Process. Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA.
14. International Standard. 2000. ISO 9001 Quality Management System - Requirements http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail? CSNUMBER=21823&ICS1=3&ICS2=120&ICS3=10&scopelist=.
15. International Standard. 2006. ISO/IEC 15504-1-6, Software Process Assessment - Parts 1-9 http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage. CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=38932&ICS1=35&ICS2=80&ICS3.
16. Jeffery R. 2006. Exploring the business process-software process relationship. In Software Process Change, SPW/ProSim2006 (held in Shanghai, China, May 20-21, 2006), Wang Q, Pfahl D, Raffo DM, Wernick P (eds). LNCS 3966, Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 11-14.
17. Kellner MI, Feiler PH, Finkelstein A, Katayama T, Osterweil LJ, Penedo MH, Rombach HD. 1991. ISPW-6 Software Process Example. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Software Process. IEEE Computer Society Press: Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan, 176-186.
18. Li M. 2005. Expanding the horizons of software development processes: a 3-D integrated methodology. In Unifying the Software Process Spectrum, SPW2005 (held in Beijing, China, May 25-27, 2005), Li M, Boehm B, Osterweil LJ (eds). LNCS 3840, Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 54-67.
19. Li M. 2006. Assessing 3-D integrated software development processes: a new benchmark. In Software Process Change, SPW/ProSim2006 (held in Shanghai, China, May 20-21, 2006), Wang Q, Pfahl D, Raffo DM, Wernick P (eds). LNCS 3966, Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 15-38.
20. Osterweil LJ. 2005. Integrating microprocess and macroprocess software research. In Unifying the Software Process Spectrum, SPW2005 (held in Beijing, China, May 25-27, 2005), Li M, Boehm B, Osterweil LJ (eds). LNCS 3840, Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 68-74.
21. Osterweil LJ. 2006. Ubiquitous process engineering: applying software process technology to other domains. In Software Process Change, SPW/ProSim2006 (held in Shanghai, China, May 20-21, 2006), Wang Q, Pfahl D, Raffo DM, Wernick P (eds). LNCS 3966, Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 39-47.
22. Reifer D. 2002. Ten deadly risks in internet and intranet software development. IEEE Software: 19(2): 12-14.
23. Rombach HD. 2005. Integrated software process & product lines. In Unifying the Software Process Spectrum, SPW2005 (held in Beijing, China, May 25-27, 2005), Li Mingshu, Boehm Barry, Osterweil LJ (eds). LNCS 3840, Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 83-90.
24. Ruhe M, Jeffery R, Wieczorek I. 2003. Cost estimation for web applications. In Proceeding of 25th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 25): Portland, Oregon, USA, 270-279.
25. Wang Y, King G. 2000. A new approach to benchmark-based process improvement. In Proceeding of European Software Process Improvement 2000 (EuroSPI 2000): Copenhagen, Denmark, 140-149.
26. Warboys B. 2005. Active models: a possible approach to the integration of objective and subjective process models. In Unifying the Software Process Spectrum, SPW2005 (held in Beijing, China, May 25-27, 2005), Li M, Boehm B, Osterweil LJ (eds). LNCS 3840, Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 100-107.
27. Wise A. 1998. Little-JIL 1.0 Language Report. Technical Report 98-24, Laboratory for Advanced Software Engineering Research, University of Massachusetts: Amherst, MA.