Navigated shorter incision or smaller implant in knee arthritis?

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 463, Issue , 2007, Pages 63-67

  Confalonieri, N ^a   Manzotti, A ^a,c   Pullen, C ^b  

^a Ist Orthopaedic Department   (Italy)

^b ROYAL MELBOURNE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BODY MASS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INCISION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE ARTHRITIS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; VARUS DEFORMITY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE COST; INSTRUMENTATION; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS; STATISTICS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH EXPENDITURES; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 35348916830     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31811f3a30     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Ahlbäck S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee: a radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1968;277(suppl):7-72.
2. Andriacchi TP, Andersson GB, Fermier RW, Stern D, Galante JO. A study of lower-limb mechanics during stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:749-757.
3. Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Aubaniac JM, Dennis DA, Northcut EJ, Anderson DT, Agostini S. In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subjects implanted with an unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:1049-1054.
4. Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, Barrett M. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(suppl 1):221-233.
5. Banks SA, Frely BJ, Boniforti F, Reischmidt C, Romagnoli S. Comparing in vivo kinematics of unicondylar and bi-unicondylar knee replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13:551-556.
6. Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Adams JB, Groseth KL. Early failure of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with obesity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:60-66.
7. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:26-34.
8. Berger RA, Sanders S, Gerlinger T, Della Valle C, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG. Outpatient total knee arthroplasty with a minimally invasive technique. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(suppl 3):33-38.
9. Chauban SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer assisted knee arthroplasty versus conventional jig-based technique: a randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:372-376.
10. Chen AF, Alan RK, Redziniak DE, Tria AJ Jr. Quadriceps sparing total knee replacement: the initial experience with results at two to four years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1448-1453.
11. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Pullen C. Comparison of a mobile with a fixed tibial bearing unicompartmental knee prosthesis: a prospective randomized trial using a dedicated outcome score. Knee. 2004;11:357-362.
12. Dalury DF, Dennis DA. Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:77-81.
13. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:282-288.
14. DiGioia AM 3rd, Blendea S, Jaramaz B, Levison TJ. Less invasive total hip arthroplasty using navigational tools. Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:157-164.
15. Fuchs S, Frisse D, Tibesku CO, Genkinger M, Laass H, Rosenbaum D. Proprioceptive function, clinical results and quality of life after unicondylar sledge prostheses. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81:478-482.
16. Fuchs S, Tibesku CO, Frisse D, Genkinger M, Laass H, Rosenbaum D. Clinical and functional comparison of uni- and bicondylar sledge prostheses. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13:197-202.
17. Haas SB, Cook S, Beksac B. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach: a comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:68-73.
18. Hamilton WG, Collier MB, Tarabee E, McAuley JP, Engh CA Jr, Engh GA. Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(suppl 2):98-107.
19. Howe DJ, Taunton OD Jr, Engh GA. Retained cement after unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2283-2286.
20. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13-14.
21. Jenny JY. Navigated unicompartmental knee replacement. Orthopedics. 2005;28(suppl):263-267.
22. Kozinn SC, Scott R. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:45-50.
23. Laskin RS. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the results justify its use. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:54-59.
24. Lonner JH. Minimally invasive approaches to total knee arthroplasty: results. Am J Orthop. 2006;35(suppl 7):27-33.
25. Manzotti A, Confalonieri N, Pullen C. Grafting of tibial bone defects in knee replacement using Norian skeletal repair system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006;126:594-598.
26. Mazzarello P, Calligaro AL, Calligaro A. Giulio Bizzozero: a pioneer of cell biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:776-781.
27. Meding JB, Keating EM, Ritter MA, Faris PM, Berend ME. Long-term followup of posterior-cruciate-retaining TKA in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:146-152.
28. Mow CS, Woolson ST, Ngarmukos SG, Park EH, Lorenz HP. Comparison of scars from total hip replacements done with a standard or a mini-incision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:80-85.
29. Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;80:862-865.
30. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, Lawlor M, Humphreys P, O'Brien S, Beverland D. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:701-710.
31. O'Rourke MR, Gardner JJ, Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, Goetz DD, Vittetoe DA, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. The John Insall Award: unicompartmental knee replacement: a minimum twenty-one-year followup, end-result study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:27-37.
32. Pagnano MW, Clarke HD, Jacofsky DJ, Amendola A, Repicci JA. Surgical treatment of the middle-aged patient with arthritic knees. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:251-259.
33. Patil S, Colwell CW, Ezet KA, D'Lima DD. Can normal knee kinematics be restored with unicompartmental knee replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:332-338.
34. Pavone V, Boettner F, Fickert S, Sculco TP. Total condylar knee arthroplasty: a long term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:18-25.
35. Repicci JA. Mini-invasive knee unicompartmental arthroplasty: bone-sparing technique. Surg Technol Int. 2003;11:282-286.
36. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement: its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:153-158.
37. Schurman DJ, Parker JN, Ornstein D. Total condylar knee replacement: a study of factors influencing range of motion as late as two years after arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:1006-1014.
38. Seon JK, Song EK. Functional impact of navigation-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2005;28(suppl 10):S1251-S1254.
39. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink K. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:830-834.
40. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Cloutier JM, Dennis DA. The cruciate ligaments in total knee arthroplasty: a kinematic analysis of 2 total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:545-550.
41. Swienckowski JJ, Pennington DW. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(suppl 1):131-142.
42. Tenholder M, Clarke HD, Scuderi GR. Minimal-incision total knee arthroplasty: the early clinical experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:67-76.
43. Thornhill TS. The mini-incision hip: proceed with caution. Orthopedics. 2004;27:193-194.
44. Weale AE, Halabi OA, Jones PW, White SH. Perceptions of outcomes after unicompartmental and total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;382:143-153.