Waterfowl distribution and abundance during spring migration in Southern Oregon and Northeastern California

Western North American Naturalist

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 409-428

  Fleskes, Joseph P ^a   Yee, Julie L ^a  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anas acuta; Great Basin; Klamath; Northern Pintail; Spring migration; Waterfowl

Indexed keywords

ANAS; ANAS ACUTA; ANATIDAE; ANSER; AVES; AYTHYA; CYGNUS; RALLIDAE;

EID: 35348914684     PISSN: 15270904     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3398/1527-0904(2007)67[409:WDAADS]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ANDERSON, W. 1957. A waterfowl nesting study in the Sacramento Valley, California, 1955. California Fish and Game 43:71-90.
2. _. 1960. A study of waterfowl nesting in the Suisun Marshes. California Fish and Game 46:217-226.
3. BELLROSE, F.C. 1980. Ducks, geese and swans of North America. 3rd edition. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, PA. 540 pp.
4. DIEM, K.L., AND K.H. LU. 1960. Factors influencing waterfowl censuses in the parklands, Alberta, Canada. Journal of Wildlife Management 24:113-133.
5. FLESKES, J.P., AND D.S. BATTAGLIA. 2002. Pintail habitat use and abundance during spring migration in the Klamath Basin and other southern Oregon-northeastern California locations. Progress report 2002, United States Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon, CA.
6. _. 2004. Northern pintail habitat use and waterfowl abundance during spring migration in southern Oregon-northeast California (SONEC). Final report, United States Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Sacramento, CA.
7. GILMER, D.S., J.L. LEE, D.M. MAUSER, AND J.L. HAINLINE. 2004. Waterfowl migration on Klamath Basin National Wildlife Refuges 1953-2001. Biological science report USGS/BRD/BSR-2003-2004, United States Geological Survey, Biological Resources Discipline.
8. HOTHEM, R.L., AND D. WELSH. 1994. Duck and shorebird reproduction in the grasslands of central California. California Fish and Game 80:68-79.
9. HUNT, C.B. 1967. Physiography of the United States. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA. 480 pp.
10. KLAMATH BASIN CRISIS. 2006. KBC News [cited 8 March 2006]. Available from: http://www.klamathbasincrisis.org
11. KLAMATH TRIBAL COUNCIL. 2001. Press release: December 2001: OSU water report [cited 8 March 2006]. Available from: http://www.klamathtribes.org/press_waterup_dec2001.htm
12. LINDSTROM, A. 2003. Fuel deposition rates in migrating birds: causes, constraints and consequences. Pages 307-320 in P. Berthold, E. Gwinner, and E. Sonnenschein, editors, Avian migration. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
13. MILLER, M.R., AND D.C. DUNCAN. 1999. The Northern Pintail in North America: status and conservation needs of a struggling population. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27:788-800.
14. MILLER, M.R., J.Y. TAKEKAWA, J.P. FLESKES, D.L. ORTHMEYER, M.L. CASAZZA, AND W.M. PERRY. 2005. Spring migration of Northern Pintails from California's Central Valley wintering area tracked with satellite telemetry: routes, timing, and destinations. Canadian Journal of Zoology 83:1314-1332.
15. NAYLOR, A.E. 1953. Production of the Canada Goose on Honey Lake Refuge, Lassen County, California. California Fish and Game 39:83-94.
16. OREGON HABITAT JOINT VENTURE. 2005. Newsletter of the Oregon Habitat Joint Venture: August 2005 [cited 7 March 2006]. West Linn, OR. Available from: http://www.ohjv.org/pdfs/news0805.pdf
17. PRENZLOW, D.M., AND J.R. LOVVORN. 1996. Evaluation of visibility correction factors for waterfowl surveys in Wyoming. Journal of Wildlife Management 60:286-297.
18. SMITH, D.H., K.J. REINECKE, M.J. CONROY, M.W. BROWN, AND J.R. NASSAR. 1995. Factors affecting visibility rate of waterfowl surveys in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Journal of Wildlife Management 59:515-527.
19. SMITH, G.W. 1995. A critical review of the aerial and ground surveys of breeding waterfowl in North America: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service Biological Science Report 5. 252 pp.
20. TROST, R.E., AND M.S. DRUT. 2004. 2004 Pacific Flyway data book: waterfowl harvests and status, hunter participation and success, and certain hunting regulations in the Pacific Flyway and United States. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR.
21. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. 2000. Pacific Flyway, 1999-2000 fall and winter waterfowl survey report. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OH.
22. _. 2002. Winter waterfowl survey, Pacific Flyway-2002. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR.
23. _. 2003. Winter waterfowl survey. Pacific Flyway-2003. United States Fish and Wikllile Service, Portland, OR.
24. _. [INTERNET]. Draft integrated pest management plan for Lower Klamath and Tule Lake NWRs [cited 7 March 2006]. Available from:http://library. fws.gov/Pubs1/1PM/Current.html
25. UNITED STATES SOCIETY FOR IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE PROFESSIONALS. 2006. Ground water and surface water under stress: competition, interaction, solutions [cited 18 April 2006]. Available from: http://www.uscid.org/06conf.html
26. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ. 1996. SUMP rotation research news [cited 7 March 2006]. Available from: http://gis.ucsc.edu/bode/newslet1.html
27. WESTERN REGIONAL CLIMATE CENTER. [INTERNET](A). California climate narrative [cited 14 January 2004]. Available from: http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/narratives/California.htm
28. _. [INTERNET](B). Oregon climate narrative [cited 14 January 2004]. Available from:http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/narratives/Oregon.htm
29. _. [INTERNET](C). Western United States climate historical summaries [cited 14 January 2004]. Available from: http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/ climsum.html
30. _. [INTERNET](D). Standardized precipitation index [cited 2 March 2004]. Available from: http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/spi/spi.html