Conformational characteristics and configurational properties of polyethylene imine-alt-ethylene sulfide and the role of the secondary amine group as a junction of attractive interactions

Macromolecules

Volumn 40, Issue 20, 2007, Pages 7393-7399

  Sasanuma, Yuji ^a   Kumagai, Ryota ^a  

^a CHIBA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINES; COMPUTATION THEORY; CONFORMATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR ORBITALS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; POLYMERS;

AMINE GROUP; INVERSIONAL-ROTATIONAL ISOMERIC STATE (IRIS); MESO-DIAD PROBABILITY;

POLYETHYLENES;

EID: 35348905757     PISSN: 00249297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ma071077b     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Here, the polymers and model compounds are assumed to be dissolved in organic solvents and hence not to be protonated.
2. Sasanuma, Y.; Hattori, S.; Imazu, S.; Ikeda, S.; Kaizuka, T.; Iijima, T.; Sawanobori, M.; Azam, M. A.; Law, R. V.; Steinke, J. H. G. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 9169.
3. Sasanuma, Y.; Kumagai, R.; Nakata, K. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 6752.
4. Sasanuma, Y.; Teramae, F.; Yamashita, H.; Hamano, I.; Hattori, S. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 3519.
5. Sasanuma, Y.; Asai, S.; Kumagai, R. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 3488.
6. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.; Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian03, revision D.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford CT, 2004.
7. Pople, J. A.; Scott, A. P.; Wong, M. W.; Radom, L. Isr. J. Chem. 1993, 33, 345.
8. For each mode compound, 63 conformers were optimized. A large number of data were obtained, thus not being shown here.
9. Ryu, Z. H.; Shin, S. H.; Lee, J. P.; Lim, G. T.; Bentley, T. W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2002, 1283.
10. Tamura, Y.; Maeda, H.; Choi, H. D.; Ishibashi, H. Synthesis 1982, 56.
11. Mndzhoyan, A. L.; Afrikyan, V. G.; Badalyan, V. E.; Markaryan, E. A.; Khorenyan, G. A. Dokl. Akad. Nauk Armyan. SSR 1958, 27, 161.
12. Gallego, M. T.; Brunet, E.; Ruano, J. L. G.; ElieI, E. L. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3905.
13. Budzelaar, P. H. M. gNMR, version 5.0. IvorySoft & Adept Scientific pic: Letchworth, U.K., 2004.
14. Sawanobori, M.; Sasanuma, Y.; Kaito, A. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 8321.
15. Flory, P. J.; Mark, J. E.; Abe, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 639.
16. Flory, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 1798.
17. Flory, P. J. Statistical Mechanics of Chain Molecules; Wiley & Sons: New York, 1969.
18. Mattice, W. L.; Suter, U. W. Conformational Theory of Large Molecules: The Rotational Isomeric State Model in Macromolecular Systems; Wiley & Sons: New York, 1994.
19. Sasanuma, Y.; Ohta, H.; Tourna, I.; Matoba, H.; Hayashi, Y.; Kaito, A. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 3748.
20. See, for example: Sasanuma, Y. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 8629.
21. CC value increases) with increasing solvent polarity, whereas the N-H⋯O attraction is too strong to be influenced by solvent.
22. c is fully large, the difference between the number- and weight-averages is negligible.
23. On the ground described in section 4.4 of ref 5, the attractive interactions should be designated as attractions or attractive forces rather than hydrogen bonds. For consistency with our previous papers, however, the term "hydrogen bond strengm" is used here.
24. Strictly, the geometrical parameters are slightly changed with HBS. However, this effect has not been considered here. The molecular geometry at HBS = 100% was used in all the computations.
25. Mattice, W. L.; Heifer, C. A.; Sokolov, A. P. Macromolecules 2004, 57, 4711.