Early stage sugarcane selection using different plot sizes

Crop Science

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1859-1864

  Milligan, Scott B ^a   Balzarini, Monica ^b   Gravois, Kenneth A ^c   Bischoff, Keith P ^c  

^a Seminis   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CÓRDOBA   (Argentina)

^c Louisiana State University Agricultural Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SACCHARUM;

EID: 35348903823     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2006.12.0822     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Arceneaux, G. 1929. Plot arrangement and some results of variety tests in Louisiana. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 3:338-348.
2. Arceneaux, G., I.E. Stokes, B.A. Belcher, and R.T. Gibbens, Jr. 1939. Border competition in sugarcane variety tests under Louisiana and Georgia conditions. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 6:403-420.
3. Becker, W.A. 1984. Manual of quantitative genetics. Academic Enterprises, Pullman, WA.
4. Dickerson, G.E. 1969. Techniques for research in quantitative animal genetics. p. 36-79. In A.B. Chapman (ed.) Techniques and procedures in animal science research. American Society of Animal Science, New York.
5. Duncan, W.G. 1969. Cultural manipulation for higher yields. p. 327-342. In J.D. Eastin et al. (ed.) Physiological aspects of crop yield. ASA, Madison, WI.
6. Falconer, D.S. 1981. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 2nd ed. Longman, New York.
7. Gravois, K.A., and S.B. Milligan. 1992. Genetic relationships between fiber and sugarcane yield components. Crop Sci. 32:62-66.
8. Hogarth, D.M. 1971. Quantitative inheritance studies in sugarcane: I. Estimation of variance components. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 22:93-102.
9. Holland, J.B. 2006. Estimating genotypic correlations and their standard errors using multivariate restricted maximum likelihood estimation with SAS Proc Mixed. Crop Sci. 46:642-654.
10. Jackson, P., and T.A. McRae. 2001. Selection of sugarcane clones in small plots: Effects of plot size and selection criteria. Crop Sci. 41:315-322.
11. Kang, M.S., J.D. Miller, and P.Y.P. Tai. 1983. Genetic and phenotypic path analysis and heritability in sugarcane. Crop Sci. 23:643-647.
12. Levene, H. 1960. Robust test for the equality of variances. p. 278-292. In I. Olkin (ed.) Contributions to probability and statistics. Stanford Univ. Press, Palo Alto, CA.
13. SAS Institute. 2002. SAS/STAT release 9.1. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
14. Schexnayder, H.P., Jr., S.B. Milligan, and F.A. Martin. 1993. Photoperiod and crossing in the Louisiana "L" sugarcane variety development program. p. 4-24. In 1993 sugarcane research annual progress report. Louisiana State Univ. Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA.
15. Skinner, J.C. 1961. Sugarcane selection experiments: 2. Competition between varieties. Technical Communications, year 1961, no. 1. Sugar Experiment Stations Board, Brisbane, QLD.
16. Skinner, J.C., and D.M. Hogarth. 1978. Efficiency of border rows in replicated sugar cane variety trials. Euphytica 27:629-643.
17. Stickler, F.C. 1960. Estimates of optimum plot size from grain sorghum uniformity trial data. Tech. Bull. 109. Kansas State Univ. of Agric. and Appl. Sci., Lawrence, KS.
18. Tovey, D.A., K.T. Glasziou, R.H. Farquhar, and T.A. Bull. 1973. Variability in radiation received by small plots of sugarcane due to differences in canopy heights. Crop Sci. 13:240-242.
19. Wassom, C.E., and R.R. Kalton. 1953. Estimation of optimum plot size using data from bromegrass uniformity trials. Bull. 396. Iowa State College Agric. Exp. Stn., Ames, IA.