Involuntary capture of visual-spatial attention occurs for intersections, both real and "imagined"

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 735-741

  Burnham, Bryan R ^a,b   Neely, James H ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35348885024     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196830     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. BACON, W. F., & EGETH, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485-496.
2. BIEDERMAN, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
3. COLE, G., GELLATLY, A., & BLURTON, A. (2001). Effect of object onset on the distribution of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1356-1368.
4. DOWNING, C, & PINKER, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 171-188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
6. GIBSON, B. S., & KELSEY, E. M. (1998). Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 699-706.
7. HUBEL, D. H., & WIESEL, T.N. (1977). Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 198, 1-59.
8. HUBEL, D. H., & WIESEL, T. N. (1979). Brain mechanisms of vision. Scientific American, 241, 150-162.
9. JULESZ, B., & BERGEN, J. R. (1983). Textons, the fundamental elements in preattentive vision and perception of textures. Bell System Technical Journal, 62, 1619-1645.
10. LOFTUS, G. R., & MASSON, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
11. SCHNEIDER, W. (1995). Micro Experimental Laboratory (Version 2.0) [Computer software]. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
12. SHOMSTEIN, S., & YANTIS, S. (2002). Object-based attention: Sensory modulation or priority setting? Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 41-51.
13. THEEUWES, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
14. THEEUWES, J. (2004). Top-down strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 65-70.
15. WOLFE, J. M., & DIMASE, J. S. (2003). Do intersections serve as basic features in visual search? Perception, 32, 645-656.
16. YANTIS, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 676-681.
17. YANTIS, S. (2000). Goal-directed and stimulus-driven determinants of attentional capture (tutorial). In S. Monsell and J. Driver (Eds), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 73-103). Cambridge, MA: MTT Press.
18. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 610-621.