Collaboration during visual search

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 704-709

  Malcolmson, Kelly A ^a   Reynolds, Michael G ^b   Smilek, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b TRENT UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35348841678     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196825     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. CHUN, M. M., & JIANG, Y. (1998). Contextual cuing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
2. CLARK, A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 345-351.
3. HARKINS, S. G., & PETTY, R. E. (1982). Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 43, 1214-1229.
4. HUTCHINS, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. INGHAM, A. G., LEVINGER, G., GRAVES, J., & PECKMAN, V. (1974). The Ringlemann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 10, 371-384.
6. JACK, A. I., & ROEPSTORFF, A. (2002). Introspection and cognitive brain mapping: from stimulus-response to script-report. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 333-339.
7. KADLEC, H. (1999). Statistical properties of d' and β estimates of signal detection theory. Psychological Methods, 4, 22-43.
8. KARAU, S. J., & WILLIAMS, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
9. KINGSTONE, A., SMILEK, D., RISTIC, J., KELLEND FRIESEN, C., & EAST-WOOD, J. D. (2003). Attention, researchers! It is time to take a look at the real world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 176-180.
10. KLEIN, R., & FARRELL, M. (1989). Search performance without eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 476-482.
11. LUCK, S. J., HILLYARD, S. A., MANGUN, G. R., & GAZZANIGA, M. S. (1989). Independent hemispheric attentional systems mediate visual search in split-brain patients. Nature, 342, 543-545.
12. LUCK, S. J., HILLYARD, S. A., MANGUN, G. R., & GAZZANIGA, M. S. (1994). Independent attentional scanning in the separated hemispheres of split-brain patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 84-91.
13. PICKERING, M. J., & GARROD, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 27, 169-226.
14. ROEPSTORFF, A., & FRITH, C. (2004). What's at the top in the top-down control of action? Script-sharing and "top-top" control of action in cognitive experiments. Psychological Research, 68, 189-198.
15. ROOS, M., SPENCER, S. J., LINARDATOS, L., LAM, K. C., & PERUNOVIC, M. (2004). Going shopping and identifying landmarks: Does collaboration improve older people's memory? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 683-696.
16. SEBANZ, N., BEKKERING, H., & KNOBLICH, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 70-76.
17. TOMASELLO, M. (1995). Joint attention as social cognition. In C. Moore & P. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 103-130). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. TREISMAN, A., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
19. WELDON, M. S., & BELLINGER, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1160-1175.
20. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
21. WOLFE, J. M., & HOROWITZ, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 495-501.