A comparative study of problem framing in multiple settings

Design Computing and Cognition '06

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 245-263

  Kvan, Thomas ^a   Gao, Song ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SCIENCE;

COMPARATIVE STUDIES; DESIGN ACTIVITY; DESIGN PROBLEMS; DESIGN PROCESS; ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS; PROBLEM FRAMINGS; REMOTE SETTINGS;

DIGITAL STORAGE;

EID: 35348841054     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5131-9_13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Corona Martinez, A and Quantrill, M: 2003, The Architectural Project, Texas A&M University Press, College Station.
2. Coyne, R: 2005, Wicked problems revisited, Design Studies 26 (1): 5-17.
3. Cross, AC and Cross, N: 1995, Observations of teamwork and social processes in design, Design Studies 16(2): 143-170.
4. Cross, N: 2001, Design cognition: results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity, in WC Newstetter (ed), Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
5. Cuff, D: 1991, Architecture: The Story of Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
6. Dorst, K: 1995, Analysing design activity: New directions in protocol analysis, Design Studies 16: 139-142.
7. Eastman, CM: 1968, Explorations of the cognitive processes in design, in Department of Computer Science Report, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
8. Ericsson, KA and Simon, HA: 1993, Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
9. Fish, JC: 1996, How Sketches Work: A Cognitive Theory for Improved System Design, the Loughborough University of Technology.
10. Gabriel, G and Maher, ML: 1999, Coding and modelling communication in architectural collaborative design, in J Bermudez (ed), ACADIA'99, pp. 152-166.
11. Gabriel, G and Maher, ML: 2000, Analysis of design communication with and without computer mediation, in A Woodcock (ed) Collaborative Design: Proceedings of Co-Designing 2000, Springer-Verlag, London, pp. 329-337.
12. Gero, JS and Mc Neill, T: 1998, An approach to the analysis of design protocols, Design Studies 19(1): 21-61. (Pubitemid 128391340)
13. Goldschmidt, G: 1990, Linkography: Assessing design productivity, in R Trappl (ed), Cybernetics and Systems '90, World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 291-298.
14. Goldschmidt, G: 1995, The designer as a team of one, Design Studies 16(2): 189-209.
15. Goldschmidt, G and Weil, M: 1998, Contents and structure in design reasoning, Design Issues 14(3): 16.
16. Jay, E. S. and Perkins, D. N.: 1997, Problem finding: The search for mechanism, in MA Runco (ed), Creativity Research Handbook, Hampton, Cresskill, NJ, pp. 257-294.
17. Kvan, T: 2001, The pedagogy of virtual design studios, Automation in Construction 10(3): 345-353. (Pubitemid 32636831)
18. Kvan, T, Vera, A and West, R: 1997, Expert and situated actions in collaborative design, in JP Barthes (ed), Proceedings of Second International Workshop on CSCW in Design International Academic Publishers, Beijing, pp. 400-405.
19. Kvan, T, Yip, WH and Vera, A: 1999, Supporting design studio learning: An investigation into design communication in computer-supported collaboration, in CSCL'99 Stanford University, pp. 328-332.
20. Lawson, B: 1994, Design in Mind, Butterworth Architecture, Oxford England.
21. Oxman, R: 1995, Viewpoint Observing the observers: Research issues in analysing design activity, Design Studies 16(2): 275-283.
22. Reitman, WR: 1964, Heuristic decision procedures, open constraints, and the structure of illdefined problems, in GL Bryan (ed) Human Judgements and Optimality, John Wiley, New York.
23. Robbins, E and Cullinan, E: 1994, Why Architects Draw, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
24. Schon, DA: 1983, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books, New York.
25. Schon, DA: 1985, The Design Studio: An Exploration of its Traditions and Potentials, RIBA Publications, London.
26. Sellen, AJ and Harper, R: 2001, The Myth of the Paperless Office, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
27. Simon, HA: 1984, The structure of ill-structured problem, in N Cross (ed), Developments in Design Methodology, John Wiley.
28. Wigley, M: 2001, Paper, scissors, blur, in M Wigley (ed), The Activist drawing: Retracing Situationist Architectures from Constant's New Babylon to BeyondDrawing Center, MIT Press, New York, pp. 27-56.
29. Zeisel, J: 1984, Inquiry by Design: Tools for Environment-Behavior Research, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.