Setting the future policy agenda for health technology assessment: A specialty mapping approach

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 405-413

  Shepherd, Jonathan ^a   Briggs, Jackie ^a   Payne, Liz ^a   Packer, Claire ^b   Kerridge, Lynn ^a   Ashton Key, Martin ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c South Central Strategic Health Authority   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biomedical; Evidence based medicine; Health policy; Technology assessment

Indexed keywords

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH POLICY; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT;

DISEASES; PUBLIC POLICY; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

HEALTH CARE;

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PAIN; POLICY; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; PAIN; POLICY MAKING; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 35348837724     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462307070638     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bandolier. Integrated care pathway. Available at: http://www.jr2.ox.ac. uk/bandolier/booth/glossary/ICP.html. Accessed 12/8/06.
2. de Vet HC, Kroese ME, Scholten RJ, et al. A method for research programming in the field of evidence-based medicine. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2001;17:433-441.
3. Department of Health. Strategic reviews for research and development: Coronary heart disease. Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/02/08/ 25/04020825.pdf. Accessed 12/8/06.
4. Department of Health. Strategic reviews for research and development: Mental health main report. Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/02/ 09/22/04020922.pdf. Accessed 12/8/06.
5. Department of Health. Effective sexual health promotion: A toolkit for PCTs and others working in the field of promoting good sexual health and HIV prevention. London: HMSO; 2003.
6. Department of Health. National service frameworks for children, young people and maternity services. London: HMSO; 2004.
7. Department of Health. Patient pathways. Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/PolicyAndGuidance/OrganisationPolicy/SecondaryCare/ TreatmentCentres/TreatmentCentresArticle/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=4097263&chk= RGATY4. Accessed 12/8/06.
8. Ellis S, Barnett-Page E, Morgan A, et al. HIV prevention: A review of reviews assessing the effectiveness of interventions to reduce the risk of sexual transmission. Evidence briefing. London: Health Development Agency; 2003.
9. Ellis S, Grey A. Prevention of sexually transmitted infections (STIs): A review of reviews into the effectiveness of non-clinical interventions. Evidence briefing. London: Health Development Agency; 2004.
10. Elwy AR, Hart GJ, Hawkes S, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to prevent sexually transmitted infections and human immunodeficiency virus in heterosexual men: A systematic review. Review; 63 refs. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1818-1830.
11. Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Review; 287 refs. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2:1-88.
12. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD's guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews. 2nd ed. York: York Publishing Services Ltd; 2001.
13. O'Toole L, Nurse P, Radda G. An analysis of cancer research funding in the UK. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:139-143.
14. Oliver S, Peersman G. Using research for effective health promotion. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2001.
15. Rees R, Kavanagh J, Burchett H, et al. HIV health promotion and men who have sex with men (MSM): A systematic review of research relevant to the development and implementation of effective and appropriate interventions. London: EPPI-Centre, Institute of Education, University of London; 2004.
16. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of genital chlamydia trachomatis infection. Edinburgh: Royal College of Physicians; 2000.
17. Shepherd J, Harden A, Rees R, et al. Young people and healthy eating: A systematic review of research on barriers and facilitators. Health Educ Res. 2006;21:239-257.
18. Somekh B. Action research: A methodology for change and development. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2006.
19. The Agree Collaboration. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation - Agree Instrument. Available at: http://www.agreecollaboration.org/ pdf/agreeinstrumentfinal.pdf. Accessed 13/8/06.
20. Hart E. Action research for health and social care: A guide to practice. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1995.
21. UK Clinical Research Collaboration. UK Health Research Analysis (accessed 13/8/06). http://www.ukcrc.org/PDF/UKCRC_Health_Research_Analysis_Report.pdf.