Para-aortic involvement and interest of para-aortic lymphadenectomy after chemoradiation therapy in patients with stage IB2 and II cervical carcinoma radiologically confined to the pelvic cavity

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 14, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 3223-3231

  Delpech, Yann ^a   Haie Meder, Christine ^a   Rey, Annie ^a   Zafrani, Yaelle ^a   Uzan, Catherine ^a   Gouy, Sebastien ^a   Pautier, Patricia ^a   Lhommé, Catherine ^a   Duvillard, Pierre ^a   Castaigne, Damienne ^a   Morice, Philippe ^a  

^a INSTITUT GUSTAVE ROUSSY   (France)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Completion surgery; Lymph node involvement; Para aortic node; Survival

Indexed keywords

CISPLATIN;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADENOSQUAMOUS CARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER REGRESSION; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PELVIS; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL RATE; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; CARCINOMA, ADENOSQUAMOUS; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CISPLATIN; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; PARA-AORTIC BODIES; PELVIC NEOPLASMS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL RATE; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 35348824891     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9526-1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Green JA, Kirwan JM, Tierney JF, et al. Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2001; 358:781-6
2. Houvenaeghel G, Lelievre L, Rigouard AL, et al. Residual pelvic lymph node involvement after concomitant chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 102:74-9
3. Ferrandina G, Mariagrazia D, Ludovisi M, et al. Lymph node involvement in locally advanced cervical cancer patients administered preoperative chemoradiation versus chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14:1129-35
4. ICRU 1985. International commission on radiation units and measurements. Dose and volume specification for reporting intracavitary therapy in gynecology. 1985. Report n 38
5. Michel G, Morice P, Castaigne D, et al. Lymphatic spread of stage IB/II cervical carcinoma: Anatomy and surgical implications. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91:360-3
6. Chassagne D, Sismondi P, Horiot JC, et al. A glossary for reporting complications of treatment in gynecological cancers. Radiother Oncol 1993; 26:195-202
7. Morice P, Castaigne D, Pautier P, et al. Interest of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage IB and II cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1999; 73:106-10
8. Leblanc E, Narducci F, Frumovitz M, et al. Therapeutic value of pretherapeutic extraperitoneal lapaoscopic staging in locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 105:304-11
9. Azria E, Morice P, Haie-Meder C, et al. Results of hysterectomy in patients with bulky residual disease at the end of chemoradiation therapy for stage IB2/II cervical carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2005; 12:332-7
10. Mariagrazia D, Anna F, Gabriella F, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: long-term outcome a nd complications. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 99(Suppl 1):S166-70
11. Classe JM, Rauch P, Rodier JF, et al. Surgery after concurrent chemoradiatherapy and brachytherapy for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer: Morbidity and outcome: Results of a multicenter study of the GCCLCC (Groupe des Chirurgiens de Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer). Gynecol Oncol 2006; 102:523-9
12. Houvenaeghel G, Lelievre L, Butarelli M, et al. Contribution of surgery in patients with bulky residual disease after chemoradiation for advanced cervical carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007; 33:498-503
13. Touboul E, Lefranc JP, Blondon J, et al. Preoperative radiation therapy and surgery in the treatment of "bulky" squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix (stage IB, IIA and IIB operable tumors). Radiother Oncol 1992; 24:32-40
14. Lai CH, Huang KG, Hong JH, et al. Randomized trial of surgical staging (extraperitoneal or laparoscopic) versus clinical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 89:160-7
15. Choi HJ, Roh JW, Seo SS, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study. Cancer 2006; 106:914-22
16. Chung HH, Lee S, Sim JS, et al. Pretreatment laparoscopic surgical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer: preliminary results in Korea. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 97:468-75
17. Rockall AG, Sohaib SA, Harisinghani MG, et al. Diagnostic performance of nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:2813-21
18. Grigsby PW, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F. Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in patients with carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19:3745-9
19. Tran BN, Grigsby PW, Dehdashti F, et al. Occult supraclavicular lymph node metastasis identified by FDG-PET in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 90:572-6
20. Roh JW, Seo SS, Lee S, et al. Role of positron emission tomography in pretreatment lymph node staging of uterine cervical cancer: a prospective surgicopathologic correlation study. Eur J Cancer 2005; 41:2086-92
21. Grigsby PW, Singh AK, Siegel BA, et al. Lymph node control in cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 59:706-12
22. Tsai CS, Chang TC, Lai CH, et al. Preliminary report of using FDG-PET to detect extrapelvic lesions in cervical cancer patients with enlarged pelvic lymph nodes on MRI/CT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 58:1506-12
23. Holcomb K, Abulafia O, Matthews RP, et al. The impact of pretreatment staging laparotomy on survival in locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 1999; 20:90-3
24. Goff BA, Muntz HG, Paley PJ, et al. Impact of surgical staging in women with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1999; 74:436-42
25. Marnitz S, Kohler C, Roth C, et al. Is there a benefit of pretreatment laparoscopic transperitoneal surgical staging in patients with advanced cervical cancer? Gynecol Oncol 2005; 99:536-44