Oxaspiropentane derivatives as effective sex pheromone analogues in the gypsy moth: Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence

Chemical Senses

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 755-763

  Solari, Paolo ^a   Crnjar, Roberto ^a   Frongia, Angelo ^a   Sollai, Giorgia ^a   Secci, Francesco ^a   Spiga, Marco ^a   Masala, Carla ^a   Liscia, Anna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAGLIARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

(+) disparlure; Electroantennograms; Insect; Lymantria dispar; Single cell recordings

Indexed keywords

2 DECYL 1 OXASPIRO[2.2]PENTANE; 4 (1 OXASPIRO[2.2]PENT 2 YL)BUTAN 1 OL; DISPARLURE; OXASPIROPENTANE DERIVATIVE; SEX PHEROMONE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTENNA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; GYPSY MOTH; HORMONE RESPONSE; INSECT CELL; MALE; NERVE CELL STIMULATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

HEXAPODA; LYMANTRIA; LYMANTRIA DISPAR;

EID: 35348821322     PISSN: 0379864X     EISSN: 14643553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjm043     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Adler V, Beroza M, Bierl BA, Sarmiento R. 1972. Electroantennograms and field attraction of the gypsy moth sex attractant disparlure and related compounds. J Econ Entomol. 65:679-681.
2. Bierl BA, Beroza M, Collier CW. 1972. Isolation, identification, and synthesis of the gypsy moth sex attractant. J Econ Entomol. 65:659-664.
3. Bernard AM, Frongia A, Secci F, Delogu G, Ollivier J, Piras PP, Salaun J. 2003. Stereospecific palladium(O)-catalyzed reduction of 2-cyclobutylidene-propyl esters: A versatile preparation of diastereomeric monoterpenoids: (±)-Fragranol and (± -Grandisol. Tetrahedron. 59:9433-9440.
4. Bernard AM, Floris C, Frongia A, Piras PP, Secci F. 2004. Use of cyclobutyl derivatives as intermediates in the synthesis of 1,2a, 3,8b-tetrahydro-2H-cyclobuta[c]chromenes. Tetrahedron. 60:449-457.
5. Bernard AM, Frongia A, Piras PP, Secci F. 2004. A new synthesis of alkylidenecyclopropanes by the Julia-Lythgoe-type olefination using sulfones and sulfoxides. Synlett. 6:1064-1068.
6. Cardé RT, Doane CC, Baker TC, Iwaki S, Marumo S. 1977. Attractancy of optically active pheromone for male gypsy moths. Environ Entomol. 6:768-772.
7. Dickens JC, Oliver JE, Mastro VC. 1997. Response and adaptation to analogs of disparlure by specialist antennal receptor neuron of gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar. J Chem Ecol. 23:2197-2210.
8. Gries G, Gries R, Khaskin G, Slessor KN, Grant GG, Liska J, Kapitola P. 1996. Specificity of nun and gypsy moth sexual communication through multiple-component pheromone blends. Naturwissenschaften. 83: 382-385.
9. Hansen K. 1984. Discrimination and production of disparlure enantiomers by the gypsy moth and nun moth. Physiol Entomol. 9:9-18.
10. Honson N, Johnson MA, Oliver JE, Prestwich GD, Plettner E. 2003. Structure-activity studies with pheromone-binding proteins of the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar. Chem Senses. 28:479-489.
11. Inkster JAH, Ling I, Honson NS, Jacquet L, Gries R, Plettner E. 2005. Synthesis of disparlure: Analogues, using resolution on microcrystalline cellulose triacetate-I. Tetrahedron Asymmetry. l6:3773-3784.
12. Kaissling KE. 1995. Single unit and electroantennogram recordings in insect olfactory organs. In. Spielman Al, Brand JG, editors. Experimental cell biology of taste and olfaction current techniques and protocols. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press. p. 361-377.
13. Kaissling KE. 2004. Physiology of pheromone reception in insects (an example of moths). Anir. 6:73-91.
14. Krieger J, Breer H. 1999. Olfactory reception in invertebrates. Science. 286:720-728.
15. Montgomery ME, Wallner WE. 1988. The gypsy moth, a westward migrant. In: Berryman AA, editor. Dynamics of forest insect populations. New York: Plenum Press. p. 353-375.
16. Mustaparta H. 1997. Olfactory coding mechanisms for pheromone and interspecific signal information in related moth species. In: Cardé RT, Minks AK, editors. Insect pheromone research: New directions. New York: New York Press. p. 144-163.
17. Plettner E, Lazar J, Prestwich EG, Prestwich GD. 2000. Discrimination of pheromone enantiomers by 2 pheromone binding proteins from the gypsy moth Lymantria dispar. Biochemistry. 39:8953-8962.
18. Plimmer JR, Schwalbe CP, Paszek EC, Bierl BA, Webb RE, Marumo S, Iwalki S. 1977. Contrasting effectiveness of (+) and (-) enantiomers of disparlure for trapping native populations of gypsy moth in Massachusetts. Environ Entomol. 6:518-522.
19. Sarmiento R, Beroza M, Bierl BA, Tardif JGR. 1972. Activity of compounds related to disparlure, the sex attractant of the gypsy moth. J Econ Entomol. 65:665-667.
20. Schneider D, Kafka WA, Beroza M, Bierl BA. 1977. Odor receptor responses of male gypsy and nun moths (lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) to disparlure and its analogs. J Comp Physiol. 113:1-15.
21. Schneider D, Lange R, Schwarz F, Beroza M, Bierl BA. 1974. Attraction of male gypsy and nun moths to disparlure and some of its chemical analogues. Oecologia. 14:19-36.
22. Smith JJB, Mitchell BK, Rolseth BM, Whitehead AT, Albert PJ. 1990. SAPID tools: Microcomputer programs for analysis of multi-unit nerve recordings. Chem Senses. 13:252-270.
23. Vogt RG, Callahan FE, Rogers ME, Dickens JC. 1999. Odorant binding protein diversity and distribution among the insects orders, as indicated by LAP, an OBP-related protein of the true bug Lygus lineolaris (Hemiptera, Heteroptera). Chem Senses. 24:481-495.
24. Zar JH. 1984. Simple linear regression. In: Zar JH, editor Biostatistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall. p. 261-291.