Effects of stimulus spectral contrast on receptive fields of dorsal cochlear nucleus neurons

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 98, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 2133-2143

  Reiss, Lina A J ^a   Bandyopadhyay, Sharba ^a   Young, Eric D ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NERVE FIBER; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; STIMULUS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; CATS; CELL COUNT; COCHLEAR NERVE; COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE FIBERS; NEURONS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 35348820550     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01239.2006     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aertsen AMHJ, Johannesma PIM. The spectro-temporal receptive field: a functional characteristic of auditory neurons. Biol Cybern 42: 133-143, 1981.
2. Attias H, Schreiner CE. Temporal low-order statistics of natural sounds. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by Mozer MC, Jordan MI, Petsche T. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997, vol. 9, p. 27-33.
3. Barbour DL, Wang X. Auditory cortical responses elicited in awake primates by random spectrum stimuli. J Neurosci 23: 7194-7206, 2003a.
4. Barbour DL, Wang X. Contrast tuning in auditory cortex. Science 299: 1073-1075, 2003b.
5. Bonin V, Mante V, Carandini M. The statistical computation underlying contrast gain control. J Neurosci 26: 6346-6353, 2006.
6. Bruce IC, Sachs MB, Young ED. An auditory-periphery model of the effects of acoustic trauma on auditory nerve responses. J Acoust Soc Am 113: 369-388, 2003.
7. Calhoun BM, Schreiner CE. Spectral envelope coding in primary auditory cortex: linear and non-linear effects of stimulus characteristics. Eur J Neurosci 10: 926-940, 1998.
8. Carney LH. A model for the responses of low-frequency auditory-nerve fibers in cat. J Acoust Soc Am 93: 401-417, 1993.
9. Chander D, Chichilnisky EJ. Adaptation to temporal contrast in primate and salamander retina. J Neurosci 21: 9904-9916, 2001.
10. Davis KA, Miller RL, Young ED. Effects of somatosensory and parallel-fiber stimulation on neurons in dorsal cochlear nucleus. J Neurophysiol 76: 3012-3024, 1996.
11. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1993.
12. Eggermont JJ, Aertsen AMHJ, Johannesma PIM. Prediction of the responses of auditory neurons in the midbrain of the grass frog based on the spectro-temporal receptive field. Hearing Res 10: 191-202, 1983a.
13. Eggermont JJ, Johannesma PIM, Aertsen AMHJ. Reverse-correlation methods in auditory research. Q Rev Biophys 16: 341-414, 1983b.
14. Enroth-Cugell C, Lennie P. The control of retinal ganglion cell discharge by receptive field surrounds. J Physiol 247: 551-578, 1975.
15. Escabi MA, Miller LM, Read HL, Schreiner CE. Naturalistic auditory contrast improves spectrotemporal coding in the cat inferior colliculus. J Neurosci 23: 11489-11504, 2003.
16. Escabi MA, Read HL. Representation of spectrotemporal sound information in the ascending auditory pathway. Biol Cybern 89: 350-362, 2003.
17. Escabi MA, Schreiner CE. Nonlinear spectrotemporal sound analysis by neurons in the auditory midbrain. J Neurosci 22: 4114-4131, 2002.
18. Gill P, Zhang J, Woolley SMN, Fremouw T, Theunissen FE. Sound representation methods for spectro-temporal receptive field estimation. J Comput Neurosci 21: 5-20, 2006.
19. Johnson DH. Applicability of white-noise nonlinear system analysis to the peripheral auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 68: 876-884, 1980.
20. Klein DJ, Depireux DA, Simon JZ, Shamma SA. Robust spectrotemporal reverse correlation for the auditory system: optimizing stimulus design. J Comput Neurosci 9: 85-111, 2000.
21. Kvale MN, Schreiner CE. Short-term adaptation of auditory receptive fields to dynamic stimuli. J Neurophysiol 91: 604-612, 2004.
22. Machens CK, Wehr MS, Zador AM. Linearity of cortical receptive fields measured with natural sounds. J Neurosci 24: 1089-1100, 2004.
23. Nagel KI, Doupe AJ. Temporal processing and adaptation in the songbird auditory forebrain. Neuron 51: 845-859, 2006.
24. Nelken I, Kim PJ, Young ED. Linear and non-linear spectral integration in type IV neurons of the dorsal cochlear nucleus. II. Predicting responses using non-linear methods. J Neurophysiol 78: 800-811, 1997.
25. Nelken I, Young ED. Linear and non-linear spectral integration in type IV neurons of the dorsal cochlear nucleus. I. Regions of linear interaction. J Neurophysiol 78: 790-799, 1997.
26. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992.
27. Reiss LA. Spectral Coding and Nonlinearity in the Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus (PhD thesis). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ., 2005.
28. Reiss LA, Young ED. Spectral edge sensitivity in neural circuits of the dorsal cochlear nucleus. J Neurosci 25: 3680-3691, 2005.
29. Robles L, Ruggero MA. Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev 81: 1305-1352, 2001.
30. Sen K, Theunissen FE, Doupe AJ. Feature analysis of natural sounds in the songbird auditory forebrain. J Neurophysiol 86: 1445-1458, 2001.
31. Shapley RM, Victor JD. The effect of contrast on the transfer properties of cat retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol 285: 275-298, 1978.
32. Shofner WP, Young ED. Excitatory/inhibitory response types in the cochlear nucleus: relationships to discharge patterns and responses to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. J Neurophysiol 54: 917-939, 1985.
33. Singh NC, Theunissen FE. Modulation spectra of natural sounds and ethological theories of auditory processing. J Acoust Soc Am 114: 3394-3411, 2003.
34. Spirou GA, Young ED. Organization of dorsal cochlear nucleus type IV unit response maps and their relationship to activation by band-limited noise. J Neurophysiol 65: 1750-1768, 1991.
35. Theunissen FE, Sen K, Doupe AJ. Spectral-temporal receptive fields of nonlinear auditory neurons obtained using natural sounds. J Neurosci 20: 2315-2331, 2000.
36. Versnel H, Shamma SA. Spectral-ripple representation of steady-state vowels in primary auditory cortex. J Acoust Soc Am 103: 2502-2514, 1998.
37. Yeshurun Y, Wollberg Z, Dyn N. Prediction of linear and non-linear responses of MGB neurons by system identification methods. Bull Math Biol 51: 337-346, 1989.
38. Young ED. Identification of response properties of ascending axons from dorsal cochlear nucleus. Brain Res 200: 23-38, 1980.
39. Young ED, Calhoun BM. Nonlinear modeling of auditory-nerve rate responses to wideband stimuli. J Neurophysiol 94: 4441-4454, 2005.
40. Young ED, Davis KA.Circuitry and function of the dorsal cochlear nucleus. In: Integrative Functions in the Mammalian Auditory Pathway, edited by Oertel D, Popper AN, Fay RR. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002, p. 160-206.
41. Young ED, Yu JJ, Reiss LA. Non-linearities and the representation of auditory spectra. Int Rev Neurobiol 70: 135-168, 2005.
42. Yu JJ. Spectral Information Encoding in the Cochlear Nucleus and Inferior Colliculus: A Study Based on the Random Spectral Shape Method (PhD thesis). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ., 2003.
43. Yu JJ, Young ED. Linear and nonlinear pathways of spectral information transmission in the cochlear nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 11780-11786, 2000.
44. Zaghloul KA, Boahen K, Demb JB. Contrast adaptation in subthreshold and spiking responses of mammalian Y-type retinal ganglion cells. J Neurosci 25: 860-868, 2005.