Ego-motion estimation and 3D model refinement in scenes with varying illumination

Proceedings - IEEE Workshop on Motion and Video Computing, MOTION 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 140-146

  Agrawal, Amit K ^a   Chellappa, Rama ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS; CAMERAS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA REDUCTION; LUMINANCE; ROBUST CONTROL;

BRIGHTNESS CONSTANCY (BC); DIGITAL ELEVATION MAP (DEM); GENERALIZED DYNAMIC IMAGE (GDI);

MOTION ESTIMATION;

EID: 35348817319     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ACVMOT.2005.45     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. G. Adiv. Determining 3D motion and structure from optical flow generated by several moving objects. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 7(4):384-401, July 1985.
2. Y. Aloimonos and C. Brown. Direct processing of curvilinear sensor motion from a sequence of perspective images. In Proc. Workshop on Computer Vision: Representation and Control, pages 72-77, 1984.
3. A. Azarbayejani and A. Pentland. Recursive estimation, of motion, structure, and focal length. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 17:562-575, 1995.
4. J. Bergen, P. Anandan, K. Hanna, and R. Hingorani. Hierarchical model-based motion estimation. In Proc. European Conf. Computer Vision, pages 237-252, Santa Margherita Ligure, Italy, May 1992.
5. M. Black, D. Fleet, and Y. Yacoob. Robustly estimating changes in image appearance. In Computer Vision and Image Understanding, volume 78, pages 8-31, Apr. 2000.
6. K. Hanna. Direct multi-resolution estimation of ego-motion and structure from motion. In IEEE Workshop on Motion and Video Computing, pages 156-162, 1991.
7. H. Haussecker and D. Fleet. Computing optical flow with physical models of brightness variation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 23(6):661-673, June 2001.
8. B. Horn and E. Weldon. Direct methods for recovering motion. Int'l J. Computer Vision, pages 51-76, 1988.
9. T. Huang and A. Netravali. Motion and structure from feature correspondences: A review. Proc. IEEE, 82:252-268, Feb. 1994.
10. S. Huffel and J. Vandewalle. The Total Least Squares Problem: Computational Aspects and Analysis. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1991.
11. M. Irani and P. Anandan. Parallax geometry of pairs of points for 3D scene analysis. In Proc. European Conf. Computer Vision, pages 17-30, Cambridge, UK, Apr. 1996.
12. M. Irani, P. Anandan, and M. Cohen. Direct recovery of planar-parallax from multiple frames. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 24(11): 1528-1534, 2002.
13. R. Koch, M. Pollefeys, and L. Gool. Realistic surface reconstruction of 3D scenes from uncalibrated image sequences. J. Visualization and Computer Animation, 11:115-127, 2000.
14. R. Kumar, P. Anandan, and K. Hanna. Direct recovery of shape from multiple views: a parallax based approach. In Proc. 12th IAPR Int'l Conf. Pattern Recognition, volume 1, pages 685-688, Jerusalem, Israel, 1994.
15. H. Liu, R. Chellappa, and A. Rosenfeld. A hierarchical approach for obtaining structure from two-frame optical flow. In Proc. Workshop on Motion and Video Computing, pages 214-219, Orlando, FL, Dec. 2002.
16. H. Liu, R. Chellappa, and A. Rosenfeld. Accurate dense optical flow estimation and segementation using adaptive structure tensors and a parametric model. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 12(10):1170-1180, 2003.
17. H. Liu, T. Hong, M. Herman, and R. Chellappa. A general motion model and spatio-temporal filters for computing optical flow. Int'l J. Computer Vision, 22:141-172, 1997.
18. S. Negahdaripour. Revised definition of optical flow: Integration of radiometric and geometric cues for dynamic scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 20(9):961-979, Sept. 1998.
19. S. Negahdaripour, N. Kolagani, and B. Hayashi. Direct motion stereo for passive navigation. In Proc. Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 425-431, June 1992.
20. S. Negahdaripour and J. Lanjing. Direct recovery of motion and range from images of scenes with time-varying illumination. In Proc. Int'l Symposium Computer Vision, pages 467-472, Nov. 1995.
21. S. Negahdaripour and C. H. Yu. A generalized brightness change model for computing optical flow. In Proc. Int'l Conf. Computer Vision, pages 2-11, 1993.
22. J. Oliensis. A multi-frame structure-from-motion algorithm under perspective projection. Int'l J. Computer Vision, 34:1-30, 1999.
23. H. Sawhney. 3D geometry from planar parallax. In Proc. Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 929-934, 1994.
24. G. Stein and A. Shashua. Model based brightness constraints: On direct estimation of structure and motion. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 22:992-1015, Sept. 2000.
25. R. Szeliski and S. Kang. Recovering 3D shape and motion from image streams using non-linear least squares. J. Visual Computation and Image Representation, 5:10-28, 1994.
26. C. Tomasi and T. Kanade. Shape and motion from image streams under orthography: A factorization method. Int'l J. Computer Vision, 9:137-154, 1992.
27. J. Weng, N. Ahuja, and T. S. Huang. Optimal motion and structure estimation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 15:864-884, Sept. 1993.
28. J. Weng, T. Huang, and N. Ahuja. 3D motion estimation, understanding, and prediction from noisy image sequences. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 9:370-389, 1987.
29. G. S. Young and R. Chellappa. 3D motion estimation using a sequence of noisy stereo images: Models, estimation, and uniqueness results. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 12:735-759, Aug. 1990.
30. L. Zhang, B. Curless, A. Hertzmann, and S. Seitz. Shape and motion under varying illumination: Unifying structure from motion, photometric stereo, and multi-view stereo. In Proc. 9th IEEE Int'l Conf. Computer Vision, pages 618-625, Oct. 2003.