Spatio-temporal modeling of evoked brain activity during memory encoding and target comparison in visual tasks

Brain Topography

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 21-30

  Mnatsakanian, Elena V ^a   Tarkka, Ina M ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF HIGHER NERVOUS ACTIVITY AND NEUROPHYSIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^b Brain Research and Rehabilitation Center Neuron   (Finland)

Author keywords

Face recognition; Selective attention; Source analysis; Visual ERP; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIPOLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISION; VISUAL MEMORY; WORKING MEMORY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ADULT; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 35348816784     PISSN: 08960267     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-007-0027-0     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Allison T, Ginter H, McCarthy G, Nobre AC, Puce A, Luby M, Spencer DD. Face recognition in human extrastriate cortex. J Neurophysiol 1994;71:821-5.
2. Allison T, Puce A, McCarthy G. Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends Cogn Sci 2000;4:267-78.
3. Baddeley A. The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends Cogn Sci 2000;4:417-23.
4. Bentin S, Allison T, Puce A, McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J Cogn Neurosci 1996;8:551-65.
5. Bentin S, Deouell LY. Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms. Cogn. Neuropsychol 2000;7:35-54.
6. Berg P, Scherg M. A fast method for forward computation of multiple-shell spherical head models. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1994;90:58-64.
7. Courtney SM, Ungerleider LG, Keil K, Haxby JV. Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory. Nature 1997;386:608-11.
8. Dietl T, Trautner P, Staedtgen M, Vannuchi M, Mecklinger A, Grunwald T, Clusman H, Elger CE, Kurthen M. Processing of famous faces and medial temporal lobe event-related potentials: a depth electrode study. NeuroImage 2005;25:401-7.
9. Druzgal TJ, D'Esposito M. A neural network reflecting decisions about human faces. Neuron 2001;32:947-55.
10. Eimer M. Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition. Clin Neurophysiol 2000;111:694-705.
11. Fogelson N, Loukas C, Brown J, Brown P. A common N400 EEG component reflecting contextual integration irrespective of symbolic form. Clin Neurophysiol 2004;115:1349-58.
12. Fransson P, Merboldt KD, Ingvar M, Petersson KM, Frahm J. Functional MRI with reduced susceptibility artifact: high-resolution mapping of episodic memory encoding. Neuroreport 2001;12:1415-20.
13. Gruber O, von Cramon DY. The functional neuroanatomy of human working memory revisited. Evidence from 3-T fMRI studies using classical domain-specific interference tasks. NeuroImage 2003;19:797-809.
14. Haxby JV, Hoffman EA, Gobbini MI. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn Sci 2000a;4:223-32.
15. Haxby JV, Petit L, Ungerleider LG, Courtney SM. Distinguishing the functional roles of multiple regions in distributed neural systems for visual working memory. NeuroImage 2000b;11:145-56.
16. Jemel B, George N, Olivares E, Fiori N, Renault B. Event-related potentials to structural face incongruity processing. Psychophysiology 1999;36:437-52.
17. Karlsgodt KH, Shirinyan D, van Erp TG, Cohen MS, Cannon TD. Hippocampal activations during encoding and retrieval in a verbal working memory paradigm. NeuroImage 2005;25:1224-31.
18. Luck SJ, Woodman GF, Vogel EK. Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends Cogn Sci 2000;4:432-40.
19. Markela-Lerenc J, Ille N, Kaiser S, Fiedler P, Mundt C, Weisbrod M. Prefrontal-cingulate activation during executive control: which comes first? Cogn Brain Res 2004;18:278-87.
20. McPherson WB, Holcomb PJ. An electrophysiological investigation of semantic priming with pictures of real objects. Psychophysiology 1999;36:53-65.
21. Mnatsakanian EV, Tarkka IM. Familiar-face recognition and comparison: source analysis of scalp-recorded event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2004;115:880-6.
22. Postle BR, Druzgal TJ, D'Esposito M. Seeking the neural substrates of visual working memory storage. Cortex 2003;39: 927-46.
23. Ranganath C, Cohen MX, Dam C, D'Esposito M. Inferior temporal, prefrontal, and hippocampal contributions to visual working memory maintenance and associative memory retrieval. J Neurosci 2004a;24: 3917-25.
24. Ranganath C, DeGutis J, D'Esposito M. Category-specific modulation of inferior temporal activity during working memory encoding and maintenance. Cogn Brain Res 2004b;20:37-45.
25. Stern CE, Sherman SJ, Kirchhoff BA, Hasselmo ME. Medial temporal and prefrontal contributions to working memory tasks with novel and familiar stimuli. Hippocampus 2001;11:337-46.
26. Weissman DH, Gopalakrishnan A, Hazlett CJ, Woldorff MG. Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex resolves conflict from distracting stimuli by boosting attention toward relevant events. Cereb Cortex 2005;15:229-37.
27. Woodman GF, Vogel EK. Fractionating working memory: consolidation and maintenance are independent processes. Psychol Sci 2005;16:106-13.
28. Zarahn E, Rakitin B, Abela D, Flynn J, Stern Y. Positive evidence against human hippocampal involvement in working memory maintenance of familiar stimuli. Cereb Cortex 2005;15:303-16.