Bidirectional interpretation of XQuery

Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Partial Evaluation and Semantics-Based Program Manipulation

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 21-30

  Liu, Dongxi ^a   Hu, Zhenjiang ^a   Takeichi, Masato ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bidirectional programming; Transformations; View update problem; XML; XQuery

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); INFORMATION USE; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; SOFTWARE DESIGN; XML;

BIDIRECTIONAL PROGRAMMING; MATERIALIZED VIEWS; XML DATA; XQUERY EXPRESSIONS;

QUERY LANGUAGES;

EID: 35348816748     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1244381.1244386     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bidirectional XQuery. http://www.ipl.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~liu/BiXQuery.html.
2. Galax: An Implementation of Query, http://www.galaxquery.org/.
3. F. Bancilhon and N. Spyratos. Updating semantics of relational views. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 6(4):557-575, 1981.
4. S. Boag, D. Chamberlin, M. F. Fernandez, D. Florescu, J. Robie, and J. Simeon. XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language, 2005. http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/.
5. A. Bohannon, J. A. Vaughan, and B. C. Pierce. Relational lenses: A language for updateable views. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM symposium on Principles of Database Systems, 2006.
6. V. Braganholo, S. Davidson, and C. Heuser. PATAX: a framework to allow updates through XML views. ACM TODS, (accepted).
7. V. Braganholo, S. Davidson, and C. Heuser. From XML view updates to relational view updates: old solutions to a new problem. In Proceedings of VLDB 2004, 2004.
8. D. Chamberlin, P. Fankhauser, D. Florescu, M. Marchiori, and J. Robie. XML Query Use Cases, 2006. http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-use-cases/.
9. U. Dayal and P. A. Bernstein. On the correct translation of update operations on relational views. ACM TODS, 7(3):381-416, 1982.
10. J. N. Foster, M. B. Greenwald, J. T. Moore, B. C. Pierce, and A. Schmitt. Combinators for bi-directional tree transformations: a linguistic approach to the view update problem. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages, pages 233-246. ACM Press, 2005.
11. G. Gottlob, P. Paolini, and R. Zicari. Properties and update semantics of consistent views. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 13(4):486-524, 1988.
12. H. Hosoya and B. C. Pierce. XDuce: A typed XML processing language. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 3(2):117-148, 2003.
13. Z. Hu, S.-C. Mu, and M. Takeichi. A programmable editor for developing structured documents based on bidirectional transformations. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Partial evaluation and semantics-based program manipulation, 2004.
14. H. Kozankiewicz, J. Leszczylowski, and K. Subieta. Updatable XML views. In ADBIS, pages 381-399, 2003.
15. A. Marian and J. Simeon. Projecting XML documents. In Proceedings of VLDB 2003, 2003.
16. D. Olteanu, H. Meuss, T. Furche, and F. Bry. XPath: Looking forward. In Proceedings of the EDBT Workshop on XML Data Management (XMLDM), volume 2490 of LNCS, pages 109-127. Springer, 2002.
17. M. Wallace and C. Runciman. Haskell and XML: generic combinators or type-based translation? In Proceedings of the fourth ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional programming, 1999.