Sex offenders on Campus: University-based sex offender registries and the collateral consequences of registration

Federal Probation

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 50-56

  Tewksbury, Richard ^a   Lees, Matthew B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35248896318     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adams, D.B. (2002). Summary of state sex offender registries, 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
2. Adkins, G., Huff, D., & Stageberg, P. (2000). The Iowa sex offender registry and recidivism. Des Moines: Iowa Department of Human Rights.
3. Berliner, L., Schram, D., Miller, L.L., & Milloy, C.D. (1995). A sentencing alternative for sex offenders: A study of decision making and recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10(4), 487-502.
4. Burton, V.S., Jr., Cullen, F.T., & Travis, L.F., III. (1987). The collateral consequences of a felony conviction: A notional study of state statutes. Federal Probation, 51(3), 52-60.
5. Crouch, B. M. (1993). Is incarceration really worse? Analysis of offenders' preferences for prison over probation. Justice Quarterly, 10(1), 67-88.
6. Curtis, K. (2003). California "loses" 33,000 sex offenders. Associated Press (published January 8, 2003).
7. Dodge, M., & Pogrebin, M.R. (2001). Collateral costs of imprisonment for women: Complications of reintegration. Prison Journal, 81(1), 42-54.
8. Finn, P. (1997). Sex offender community notification. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
9. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of a spoiled identity. New York: Touchstone Books.
10. Goodman, E. A. (1996). Megan's Law: The New Jersey Supreme Court navigates uncharted waters. Seton Hall Law Review, 26, 764-802.
11. Harding, D. (2003). Jean Valjean's dilemma: The management of ex-convict identity in the search for employment. Deviant Behavior, 24(6), 571-596.
12. Larson, C. J., & Berg., B. L. (1989). Inmates' perceptions of determinate and indeterminate sentences. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7(1), 127-137.
13. Levenson, J. S. & Cotter, L. P. (2005). The effect of Megan's Law on sex offender reintegration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 49-66.
14. Lieb, R. (1996). Community notification laws: "A step towards more effective solutions." Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11(2), 298-300.
15. Mustaine, E. E., Tewksbury, R., & Stengel, K. M. (2006). Residential location and mobility of registered sex offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice.
16. Mustaine, E. E., Tewksbury, R., & Stengel, K. M. (In-press). Social disorganization and residential locations of registered sex offenders: Is this a collateral consequence? Deviant Behavior.
17. National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Digest of Education Statistics, 2004. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education (Available at http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d04/tables/dt04_173.asp)
18. Olivares, K.M., Burton, V., Jr., & Cullen, F.T. (1996). The collateral consequences of a felony conviction: A national study of state legal codes 10 years later. Federal Probation, 60(3), 10-17.
19. Pawson, R. (2002). Does Megan's Law work? A theory-driven systematic review. ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice: Working Paper 8. London: University of London. (Available at http://www.evidencenetwork.org/cgi- win/enet.exe/biblioview?780)
20. Petersilia, J., & Deschenes, E. P. (1994). What punishes? Inmates rank the severity of prison vs. intermediate sanctions. Federal Probation, 58(1), 3-8.
21. Pogrebin, M., Dodge, M., & Katsampes, P. (2001). The collateral costs of short-term jail incarceration: The long-term social and economic disruptions. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5(4), 64-69.
22. Presser, L. & Gunnison, E. (1999). Strange bed-fellows: Is sex offender notification a form of community justice? Crime & Delinquency, 45(3), 299-315.
23. Quinn, J., Forsyth, C., & Mullen-Quinn, C. (2004). Societal reaction to sex offenders: A review of the origins and results of the myths surrounding their crimes and treatment amenability. Deviant Behavior, 25(3), 215-233.
24. Sack, W. H., & Mason, R. (1980). Child abuse and conviction of sexual crimes: A preliminary finding. Law and Human Behavior, 4(3), 211-215.
25. Sherman, L. W. (1993). Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: A theory of the criminal sanction. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(4), 445-473.
26. Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. A. (1984) The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49(1), 261-272.
27. Szymkowiak, K., & Fraser, T. (2002). Registered sex offenders in Hawaii. Honolulu, HI: Department of the Attorney General.
28. Tewksbury, R. (2002). Validity and utility of the Kentucky sex offender registry. Federal Probation, 66(1), 21-26.
29. Tewksbury, R. (2004). Experiences and attitudes of registered female sex offenders. Federal Probation, 68 (3), 30-33.
30. Tewksbury, R. (2005). Collateral consequences of sex offender registration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 67-81.
31. Tewksbury, R. (2006). Sex offender registries as a tool for public safety: Views from registered offenders. Western Criminology Review, 7 (1), 1-8.
32. Tewksbury, R., & Higgins, G. (2005). What can be learned from an online sex offender Registry site? Journal of Community Corrections, 14(3), 9-11, 15-16.
33. Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M. (2006). Perceptions of sex offender registration: Collateral consequences and community experiences. Sociological Spectrum 26 (3), 309-334.
34. Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M. (in-press). Perceptions of punishment: How registered sex offenders view registries. Crime and Delinquency.
35. Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. (2006). Where to find sex offenders: An examination of residential locations and neighborhood conditions. Criminal Justice Studies 19 (1), 61-75.
36. Turley, E., & Hutzel, L. (2001). West Virginia Sex Offender Study. Charleston, WV: Division of Criminal Justice Services (Retrieved November 8, 2005, from: http://www.wvdcjs.com/publications/)
37. Turner, S., Greenwood, P., Fain, T., & Deschenes, E. P. (1999). Perceptions of drug court: How offenders view ease of program completion, strengths and weaknesses, and the impact on their lives. National Drug Court Institute Review, 2(1), 61-85.
38. Vandiver, D. M., & Walker, J. T. (2002). Female sex offenders: An overview and analysis of 40 cases. Criminal Justice Review, 27(2), 284-300.
39. Wekhans, S. (2005). Megan's law: Evaluations of sexual offender registries. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16(2), 123-140.
40. Williams, K. R., & Hawkins, R. (1992). Wife assault, costs of arrest, and the deterrence process. The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29(3), 292-310.
41. Zevitz, R.G., & Farkas, M. (2000). Sex offender community notification: Managing high risk criminals or exacting further vengeance? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18(2-3), 375-391.