Differentiating solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) with 3D shape features

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 6514, Issue PART 2, 2007, Pages

  Yang, Wang ^a   McNitt Gray, Michael F ^a   Brown, Matthew S ^a   Goldin, Jonathan G ^a   Haiming, Zhao ^a   Aberle, Denise R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Characterization; CT; Curvedness; Lung cancer; Shape index; SPN

Indexed keywords

3D SHAPE FEATURES; COMPACTNESS FACTOR; CT HELICAL SCANNING-PARAMETERS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS (LRA); SHAPE INDEX (SI); SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULES (SPNS);

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; FEATURE EXTRACTION; PATIENT TREATMENT; PULMONARY DISEASES; RADIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 35248894965     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.713686     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Society, A.C., Cancer Statistics 2005. 2005.
2. Cardinale, L., et al., Low dose CT in early lung cancer diagnosis: Prevalence data. Radiol Med (Torino), 2005. 110(5-6): p. 532-43.
3. Swensen, S.J., et al., Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. Radiology, 2003. 226(3): p. 756-61.
4. Pastorino, U., et al., Early lung-cancer detection with spiral CT and positron emission tomography in heavy smokers: 2-year results. Lancet, 2003. 362(9384): p. 593-7.
5. Yamashita, K., et al., Solitary pulmonary nodule: preliminary study of evaluation with incremental dynamic CT. Radiology, 1995. 194(2): p. 399-405.
6. Swensen, S.J., et al., Pulmonary nodules: CT evaluation of enhancement with iodinated contrast material. Radiology, 1995. 194(2): p. 393-8.
7. Minming Zhang, M.K., Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Evaluation of Blood Flow Patterns with Dynamic CT. Radioolgy, 1997. 206: p. 471-478.
8. Aristofances C. Silva, P.C.P.C, Marcelo Gettass, Diagnosis of Lung Nodule using semivariogram and geometric measure in computerized tomography images. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2004. 008.
9. Shah, S.K., et al., Computer-aided diagnosis of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Acad Radiol, 2005. 12(5): p. 570-5.
10. Mori, K., et al., Development of a novel computer-aided diagnosis system for automatic discrimination of malignant from benign solitary pulmonary nodules on thin-section dynamic computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2005. 29(2): p. 215-22.
11. Brown, M.S., et al., Automated measurement of single and total lung volume from CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 1999. 23(4): p. 632-40.
12. Swensen, S.J., et al., Lung nodule enhancement at CT: prospective findings. Radiology, 1996. 201(2): p. 447-55.
13. Swensen, S.J., Functional CT: lung nodule evaluation. Radiographics, 2000. 20(4): p. 1178-81.
14. McNitt-Gray, M.F., et al., A pattern classification approach to characterizing solitary pulmonary nodules imaged on high resolution CT: preliminary results. Med Phys, 1999. 26(6): p. 880-8.
15. McNitt-Gray, M.F., et al., A Pattern Classification Approach to Characterizing Solitary Pulmonary Nodules Imagedon High Resolution Computed Tomography. SPIE Medical Imaging, 1996. 2710: p. 1024-1034.
16. Monteiro, K.M., et al., Self-assembly and structural characterization of Echinococcus granulosus antigen B recombinant subunit oligomers. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2006.
17. Kawata Yoshiki, N.N., Shape analysis of pulmonary nodules based on thin-section CT images. SPIE Medical Imaging, 1997. 3034: p. 964-974.
18. Koenderink, J.J. and A.J. Van Doom, Surface shape and curvature scales. Image and vision computing, 1992. 10(8).
19. Kurt Rossmann Lab, http://www-radiology.uchicago.edu/krl/KRL_ROC/ software_index6.htm. 2006.
20. Chin A Yi, M., solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Dynamic Enhanced Multi-Detector Row CT Study and Comparison with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Microvessel Density. Radiology, 2004(233): p. 191-199.
21. Swensen, S.J., et al., Lung nodule enhancement at CT: multicenter study. Radiology, 2000. 214(1): p. 73-80.
22. Swensen, S.J., et al., The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules. Application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules. Arch Intern Med, 1997. 157(8): p. 849-55.
23. Swensen, S.J., et al., CT screening for lung cancer: five-year prospective experience. Radiology, 2005. 235(1): p. 259-65.
24. Miles, K.A., M.R. Griffiths, and M.A. Fuentes, Standardized perfusion value: universal CT contrast enhancement scale that correlates with FDG PET in lung nodules. Radiology, 2001. 220(2): p. 548-53.
25. Miles, K.A. and M.R. Griffiths, Perfusion CT: a worthwhile enhancement? Br J Radiol, 2003. 76(904): p. 220-31.
26. Miles, K.A., et al., Application of CT in the investigation of angiogenesis in oncology. Acad Radiol, 2000. 7(10): p. 840-50.
27. Miles, K.A., Perfusion CT for the assessment of tumour vascularity: which protocol? Br J Radiol, 2003. 76 Spec No 1: p. S36-42.
28. Tateishi, U., et al., Contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography for the evaluation of tumor angiogenesis in patients with lung carcinoma. Cancer, 2002. 95(4): p. 835-42.
29. Yang Wang, M.F.M.-G., Sumit K. Shah. Matthew S. Brown, Jonathan G. Goldin, Denise R. Aberle, Iva Petkovska, Kirsten L. Boedeker, Creation and Analysis of 4D CT Contrast Enhancement Map for Solitary Pulmonary Nodules (SPNs). RADIOGRAPHIC, 2005.