Perception and payment of economic sanctions: A survey of offenders

Federal Probation

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 26-31

  Ruback, R Barry ^a   Hoskins, Stacy N ^a   Cares, Alison C ^b   Feldmeyer, Ben ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CENTRAL CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35248892536     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Alexander, D., Montgomery, J., Hamilton, G., Dutton, D. W., Griswold, R. R., Russell, J. R., Salo, R. J., & Muse, M. K. (1998). Fines and restitution: Improvement needed in how offenders' payment schedules are determined. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
2. Allen, G. F., & Treger, H. (1994, June). Fines and restitution orders: Probationers' perceptions. Federal Probation, 58, 34-40.
3. Apospori, E., & Alpert, G. (1993). The role of differential experience with the criminal justice system in changes in perceptions of severity of legal sanctions over time. Crime and Delinquency, 39, 184-194.
4. Cohen, R. (1995). Probation and parole violation in state prison, 1991. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington, DC:
5. Durose, M. R., & Langan, P. A. (2004). Felony sentences in state courts, 2002. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin NCJ 1206916. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
6. Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey methodology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
7. Langan, P. (1994). Between prison and probation: Intermediate sanctions. Science, 264, 791-793.
8. Lurigio, A. J., & Davis, R. C. (1990). Does a threatening letter increase compliance with restitution orders?: A field experiment. Crime and Delinquency, 36, 537-548.
9. McClelland, K. A., & Alpert, G. P. (1985). Factor analysis applied to magnitude estimates of punishment seriousness: Patterns of individual differences. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1, 307-318.
10. Mendoza, M., & Sullivan, C. (2006, March 19). Unpaid federal penalties add up to a fine mess. Centre Daily Times, pp. A1, A6.
11. Orth, U. (2003). Punishment goals of crime victims. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 173-186.
12. Outlaw, M. C., & Ruback, R. B. (1999). Predictors and outcomes of victim restitution orders. Justice Quarterly, 16, 847-869.
13. Petersilia, J., & Deschenes, E. P. (1994). Perceptions of punishment: Inmates and staff rank the severity of prison versus intermediate sanctions. The Prison Journal, 74, 306-328.
14. Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1993). Intensive probation and parole. In M. Tonry (FxL), Crime and justice: A review of research (vol. 17, pp. 281-335). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Ruback, R. B., & Bergstrom, M. (2006). Economic sanctions in criminal justice: Purposes, effects, and implications. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 242-273.
16. Ruback, R. B., Shaffer, J. R., & Logue, M. A. (2004). The imposition and effects of restitution in four Pennsylvania counties. Crime and Delinquency, 50, 168-188.
17. Spelman, W. (1995). The severity of intermediate sanctions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 107-135.
18. Wheeler, G. R., Hissong, R. V., Slusher, M. P., & Macan, T. M. (1990). Economic sanctions in criminal justice: Dilemma for human service? Justice System Journal, 14, 63-77.