Addressing the homeland security problem: A collaborative decision-making framework

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2665, Issue , 2003, Pages 249-265

  Raghu, T S ^a   Ramesh, R ^b   Whinston, Andrew B ^c  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; NATIONAL SECURITY;

ANALYTICAL TRACTABILITY; COLLABORATIVE APPROACH; COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING; CONNECTIONIST MODELS; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; HOMELAND SECURITY PROBLEMS; INFORMATION SOURCES; INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES;

SECURITY SYSTEMS;

EID: 35248888932     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44853-5_19     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Brookings Institution Project on Homeland Security, available at http://www.brook.edu/dybdocroot/fp/projects/homeland/report.htm, 2002 (pages 51-66).
2. Phan Minh Dung: "On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games." Artificial Intelligence 77(2): 321-358, 1995.
3. Feldman, J. A., "A Conncctionist Model of Visual Memory," In G. E. Hinton, and J. A. Anderson (Eds.), Parallel Models of Associative Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1981.
4. Feldman, J., and D. Bollard, "Connectionist Models and their Properties," Cognitive Science, 6, 205-254, 1982.
5. Guarino, Nicola. "Formal Ontology and Information Systems," in N. Guarino (ed.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems, IOS Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 3-15, 1998.
6. Hua, G., and Kimbrough, S., "On Hypermedia Based Argumentation Decision Support Systems," Decision Support Systems, 22, 259-275, 1998.
7. Loui, R. P., "Argument and Arbitration Games." Workshop on Computational Dialectics, AAAI Conference, 72-83, 1994.
8. Kimbrough, S. O., "A Graph Representation for Management of Logic Models," Decision Support Systems, 2, 27-37, 1986.
9. Lin, F., and Shoham, Y., "Provably correct theories of action." Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery. 42(2), 293-320. 1995.
10. Locks, M. O., "The Logic of Policy as Argument," Management Science, 31(1), 109-114, 1985.
11. Lorenzen, P., Formal Logic, Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1965.
12. Loui, R. P., "Argument and Arbitration Games." Workshop on Computational Dialectics, AAAI Conference, 72-83, 1994.
13. Mitroff, I. I., R. O. Mason, and V. P. Barabba, "Policy as Argument-A Logic for Ill-Structured Decision Problems," Management Science, 28(12), 1391-1404, 1982.
14. Raghu T. S., Ramesh. R., Whinston, A. B., and Ai-Mei Chang, "Collaborative Decision Making: A Connectionist Paradigm for Dialectical Support." Information Systems Research, 12(4), 363-383, 2001.
15. Ramesh, R., A. B. Whinston, "Claims, Arguments, and Decisions: Formalisms for Representation, Gaming and Coordination," Information Systems Research, 5(3), 294-324, 1994.
16. Thagard, P., "Explanatory Coherence," Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 435-502, 1989.
17. Thornber, K. K., "The Fidelity of Fuzzy-logic Inference," IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 1(4), 288-297, 1993.
18. Toulmin, S., The Uses of Arguments, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1958.
19. Wand, Yair; Storey, Veda C.; and Weber, Ron. "An Ontological Analysis of the Relationship Construct in Conceptual Modeling," ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 24(4), 494-528, 2000.