Classifying interoperability conflicts

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2580, Issue , 2003, Pages 62-71

  Davis, L ^a   Flagg, D ^a   Gamble, R ^a   Karatas, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TULSA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTEROPERABILITY; MIDDLEWARE;

APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT; ARCHITECTURE-BASED; COMMON PATH; INTEGRATED APPLICATIONS; LEGACY PRODUCTS; LEVEL OF ABSTRACTION; SOFTWARE INTEGRATION;

APPLICATION PROGRAMS;

EID: 35248886091     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36465-x_6     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Abd-Allah, A.: Composing Heterogeneous Software Architectures. Ph. D. Dissertation, Computer Science, University of Southern California (1996)
2. Abd-Allah, A., and Boehm, B.: Models for Composing Heterogeneous Software Architectures. USC-CSE-96-505, University of Southern California (1996)
3. Abowd, G., Allen, R., and Garlan, D.: Formalizing Style to Understand Descriptions of Software Architecture. In: ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodologies 4(4) (1995) 319-364
4. Allen, R.: A Formal Approach to Software Architecture. TR CMU-CS-97-144 (1997)
5. Barret, D., Clarke, L., Tarr, P., and Wise, A.: A Framework for Event-Based Software Integration. In: ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 5(4) (1996) 378-421
6. Davis, L., and Gamble, R.: The Impact of Component Architectures on Interoperability. Journal of Systems and Software (2002)
7. Davis, L., Gamble, R., Payton, J., Jonsdottir, G., and Underwood, D.: A Notation for Problematic Architecture Interactions. In: ESEC/FSE, Vienna, Austria (2001)
8. Davis, L., Payton, J., and Gamble, R.: How System Architectures Impede Interoperability. In: 2nd International Workshop On Software and Performance (2000)
9. DeLine, R.: Techniques to Resolve Packaging Mismatch (1999)
10. Gacek, C.: Detecting Architectural Mismatches During Systems Composition. Usc/cse-97-tr-506 (1997)
11. Garlan, D., Allen, A., and Ockerbloom, J.: Architectural Mismatch, or Why it is Hard to Build Systems Out of Existing Parts. In: ICSE, Seattle, WA (1995)
12. Garlan, D., Monroe, R., and Wile, D.: ACME: An Architectural Description Language. In: Cascon (1997)
13. Gruhn, V., and Wellen, U.: Integration of Heterogeneous Software Architectures. Experience Report (1999)
14. Kazman, R., Clements, P., Bass, L., and Abowd, G.: Classifying Architectural Elements as a Foundation for Mechanism Matching. Washington, DC (1997)
15. Kelkar, A., and Gamble, R.: Understanding the Architectural Characteristics Behind Middleware Choices. In: 1st International Conference in Information Reuse and Integration (1999)
16. Mularz, D.: Pattern-based Integration Architectures. In: PLoP (1994)
17. Perry, D., and Wolf, A.: Foundations for the Study of Software Architecture. In: ACM SIGSOFT 17(4) (1992) 40-52.
18. Shaw, M., and Clements, P.: A Field Guide to Boxology: Preliminary Classification of Architectural Styles for Software Systems. In: 1st International Computer Software and Applications Conference, Washington, DC (1997)
19. Shaw, M., and Garlan, D.: Software Architecture: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. NJ: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1996)
20. Sitaraman, R.: Integration of Software Systems at an Abstract Architectural Level. University of Tulsa (1997)
21. Soni, D., Nord, R., and Hofmeister, C.: Software Architecture in Industrial Applications. In: International Conference on Software Engineering, Seattle, WA (1995)
22. Yakimovich, D., Travassos, G. H., and Basili, V.: A Classification of Software Components Incompatibilities for COTS Integration (2000)