Retrospective analysis comparing hollow fiber and silicone membrane oxygenators for neonates on ECMO

Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 71-74

  Mejak, Brian ^a   Giacomuzzi, Carmen ^a   Heller, Eileen ^a   You, Xiaomang ^a   Ungerleider, Ross ^a   Shen, Irving ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Hollow fiber; Oxygenator; Silicone

Indexed keywords

SILICONE; POLYPROPYLENE; SILICONE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDURANCE; EXTRACORPOREAL OXYGENATION; FEMALE; GAS DIFFUSION; HOLLOW FIBER MEMBRANE; HUMAN; MALE; NEWBORN; OXYGENATOR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ECONOMICS; INSTRUMENTATION; LONG TERM CARE; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE;

EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS, NEONATAL; LIFE SUPPORT CARE; MALE; POLYPROPYLENES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SILICONES;

EID: 35248882481     PISSN: 00221058     EISSN: 29698960     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Searles B, Gunst G, Terry B, et al. 2004 Survey of ECMO in the neonate after open heart surgery: Circuitry and team roles. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2005;37:351-4.
2. Groom RC, Froebe S, Martin J, et al. Update on pediatric perfusion practice in North America: 2005 survey. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2005;37:343-50.
3. Lawson DS, Walczak R, Lawson A, et al. North American neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) devices: 2002 survey results. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2004;36:16-21.
4. Walczak R, Lawson DS, Kaemmer D, et al. Evaluation of a preprimed microporous hollow-fiber membrane for rapid response neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Perfusion. 2005;20:269-75.
5. Gu YJ, Boonstra PW, Graaff R, et al. Pressure drop, shear stress, and activation of leukocytes during cardiopulmonary bypass: A comparison between hollow fiber and flat sheet membrane oxygenators. Artif Organs. 2000;24:43-8.
6. Stammers AH, Christensen KA, Lynch J, et al. Quantitative evaluation of heparin-coated versus non-heparin coated bypass circuits during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1999;31:135-41.
7. Ozawa T, Yoshihara K, Koyama N, et al. Clinical efficacy of heparin-bonded bypass circuits related to cytokine responses in children. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:584-90.
8. Pappalardo F, Valle PD, Crescenzi G, et al. Phosphorylcholine coating may limit thrombin formation during high-risk cardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:886-91.
9. De Somer F, Francois K, van Oeveren W, et al. Phosphorylcholine coating of extracorporeal circuits provides natural protection against blood activation by the material surface. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;18:602-6.
10. De Somer F, Van Belleghem Y, Caes F, et al. Phosphorylcholine coating offers natural platelet preservation during cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2002;17:39-44.
11. Blumberg N, Triulzi D, Heal J. Transfusion-induced immunomodulation and its clinical consequences. Transfus Med Rev. 1990;4(Suppl 1):24-35.
12. Murphy PJ, Connery C, Hicks GL Jr, et al. Homologous blood transfusion as a risk factor for postoperative infection after coronary artery bypass graft operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;104:1092-9.
13. Spiess BD. Blood conservation: Why bother? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18(4 Suppl):1S-5S.
14. Khoshbin E, Westrope C, Pooboni S, et al. Performance of polymethyl pentene oxygenators for neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A comparison with silicone membrane oxygenators. Perfusion. 2005;20:129-34.