Honesty and trust revisited: The advantages of being neutral about other's cognitive models

Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 313-335

  Gómez, Mario ^a   Carbó, Javier ^a   Earle, Clara Benac ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

ART testbed; Reputation; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 35248879205     PISSN: 13872532     EISSN: 15737454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10458-007-9015-8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Abdul-Rahman, S. H. A. (2000). Supporting trust in virtual communities. In 33th IEEE International Conference on Systems Sciences.
2. Ba S., Whinston A., Zhang H. (2003) Building trust in online auction markets through an economic incentive mechanism. Decision Support System 35: 273-286
3. Braynov, S., & Sandholm, T. (2002). Trust revelation in multiagent interaction. In Proceedings of CHI'02 Worhshop on the Philosophy and Design of Socially Adept Technologies (pp. 57-60). Minneapotis.
4. Carbo, J., Garcia, J., & Molina, J. (2004). Subjective trust inferred by kalman filtering vs. a fuzzy reputation. In S. Wang, D. Yang, & K. Tanaka (Eds.) Workshop on Conceptual Modelling for Agents (COMOA2004), 23th International Conference on Conceptual Modelling, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3289, pp.496-505). Shanghai, China: Springer-Verlag November 2004.
5. Carbo, J., Garcia, J., & Molina, J. (2005). Convergence of agent reputation with alpha-beta filtering vs. a fuzzy system. In International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce, Wien, Austria, November 2005.
6. Carbo J., Molina J., Davila J. (2003) Trust management through fuzzy reputation. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 12(1): 135-155
7. Castellfranchi, C., & Falcone, R. (1998). Principles of trust for multiagent systems: Cognitive anatomy, social importance and quantification. In Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (pp. 72-79).
8. Conte, R., & Paolucci, M. (2002). Reputation in artificial societies. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. Fullam, K., Klos, T., Muller, G., Sabater, J., Schlosser, A., Topol, Z., Barber, K.S., Rosenschein, J., Vercouter, L., & Voss. M. A specification of the agent reputation and trust (art) testbed: Experimentation and competition for trust in agent societies. In The Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-2005), (pp. 512-518).
10. Huynh T.D., Jennings N.R., Shadbolt N.R. (2006) An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 13(2): 119-154
11. Schillo P.F.M., Rovatsos M. (2000) Using trust for detecting deceitful agents in artificial societies. Applied Artificial Intelligence, Special Issue on Trust, Deception and Fraud in Agent Societies 14(8): 825-849
12. Marsh, S. (1994). Trust in distributed artificial intelligence. In C. Castelfranchi & E. Werner (Eds.) Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (Vol. 830, pp. 94-112) Springer Verlag.
13. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2003). Artificial inteslligence: A modern approach. Prentice Hall Pearson Education International.
14. Sabater, J. (2003). Trust and reputation for agent societies. Consejo Superior de Bellaterra, Spain: Investigaciones Cientificas.
15. Sabater, J., & Sierra, C. (2001). Regret: A reputation model for gregarious societies. In Fourth Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies (pp. 61-69). Montreal, Canada.
16. Sen, S., Biswas, A., & Debnath, S. (2000). Believing others: Pros and cons. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on MulitAgent Systems (pp. 279-285). Boston, MA, July 2000.
17. Wasserman S., Galaskiewicz J. (1994) Advances in social network analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks U.S.
18. Yu, B., & Singh, M. (2000). A social mechanism for reputation management in electronic communities. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 1860, pp. 154-165). Springer.
19. Zacharia G., Maes P. (2000) Trust management through reputation mechanisms. Applied Artificial Intelligence 14: 881-907