An introduction to induced loudness reduction

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 122, Issue 3, 2007, Pages

  Epstein, Michael ^a  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC WAVES; DATA REDUCTION; NOISE ABATEMENT; SPEECH PROCESSING;

INDUCED LOUDNESS REDUCTION (ILR); INDUCER TONES;

ACOUSTIC VARIABLES MEASUREMENT;

ACOUSTICS; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; AUDIOMETRY; COCHLEA; CONFERENCE PAPER; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LOUDNESS; MEASUREMENT; NOISE REDUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SOUND INTENSITY;

AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CALIBRATION; HEARING; HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; SOUND; SOUND LOCALIZATION; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 35248877641     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.2761922     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Arieh, Y., Kelly, K., and Marks, L. E. (2005). " Tracking the time to recovery after induced loudness reduction (L)., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 3381-3384.
2. Arieh, Y., and Marks, L. E. (2001). " Recalibration of loudness: Sensory vs. decisional processes., " in Fechner Day 2001, edited by, E. Sommerfeld,,, R. Kompass,, and, T. Lachmann, (Pabst, Berlin).
3. Arieh, Y., and Marks, L. E. (2003). " Time course of loudness recalibration: Implications for loudness enhancement., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 1550-1556.
4. Braida, L. D., and Durlach, N. I. (1972). " Intensity perception. II. Resolution in one-interval paradigms., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 51, 483-502.
5. Buus, S., Florentine, M., Poulsen, T., and Müsch, H. (1999). " On the relation between peripheral compression and the growth of loudness., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 1022.
6. Epstein, M., and Florentine, M. (2005). " A test of the equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis using cross-modality matching functions., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 907-913.
7. Epstein, M., and Gifford, E. (2006). " A potential carry-over effect in the measurement of induced loudness reduction., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 305-309.
8. Florentine, M., and Epstein, M. (2006). " To honor Stevens and repeal his law (for the auditory system)., " in Fechner Day, edited by, D. E. Kornbrot,,, R. M. Msetfi,, and, A. W. MacRae, (International Society for Psychophysics, St. Albans, UK).
9. Hellman, R. P., and Zwislocki, J. J. (1963). " Monaural loudness function at 1000 cps and interaural summation., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35, 856-865.
10. Mapes-Riordan, D., and Yost, W. A. (1997). " Loudness recalibration as a function of recalibration and comparison tone level., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 3170.
11. Mapes-Riordan, D., and Yost, W. A. (1998). " Temporal properties of loudness recalibration., " Proc. 16th International Congress on Acoustics, Seattle, WA, pp. 2361-2362.
12. Mapes-Riordan, D., and Yost, W. A. (1999). " Loudness recalibration as a function of level., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 3506-3511.
13. Marks, L. E. (1992). " The slippery context effect in psychophysics: Intensive, extensive, and qualitative continua., " Percept. Psychophys. 51, 187-198.
14. Marks, L. E. (1994). " 'Recalibrating' the auditory system: The perception of loudness., " J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 20, 382-396.
15. Marks, L. E., and Warner, E. (1991). " Slippery context effect and critical bands., " J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 17, 986-996.
16. Marozeau, J., Epstein, M., Florentine, M., and Ioffe, S. (2006). " Loudness reduction caused by a tone at a different frequency., " American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), Miami, FL.
17. Moore, B. C., and Glasberg, B. R. (1987). " Formulae describing frequency selectivity as a function of frequency and level, and their use in calculating excitation patterns., " Hear. Res. 28, 209-225.
18. Nieder, B., Buus, S., Cazals, Y., and Scharf, B. (2007). " Loudness reduction induced by a contralateral tone., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 35-37.
19. Nieder, B., Buus, S., Florentine, M., and Scharf, B. (2003). " Interactions between test- and inducer-tone durations in induced loudness reduction., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 2846-2855.
20. Oberfeld, D. (2007). " Loudness changes induced by a proximal sound: Loudness enhancement, loudness recalibration, or both?, " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 2137-2148.
21. Parker, S., and Schneider, B. (1994). " The stimulus range effect: Evidence for top-down control of sensory intensity in audition., " Percept. Psychophys. 56, 1-11.
22. Scharf, B., Buus, S., and Nieder, B. (2002). " Loudness enhancement: Induced loudness reduction in disguise? (L)., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 807-810.
23. Schneider, B., and Parker, S. (1990). " Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments., " Percept. Psychophys. 48, 409-418.
24. Silva, I., and Florentine, M. (2006). " Effect of adaptive psychophysical procedure on loudness matches., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 2124-2131.
25. Suzuki, Y., and Takeshima, H. (2004). " Equal-loudness-level contours for pure tones., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 918-933.
26. Wagner, E., and Scharf, B. (2006). " Induced loudness reduction as a function of exposure time and signal frequency., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 1012-1020.
27. Ward, L. M., Armstrong, J., and Golestani, N. (1996). " Intensity resolution and subjective magnitude in psychophysical scaling., " Percept. Psychophys. 58, 793-801.
28. Zwicker, E., and Fastl, H. (1990). Psychoacoustics-Facts and Models (Springer, Berlin).