Sex ratio mediated pollen limitation in the dioecious herb Antennaria dioica

Ecoscience

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 387-398

  Öster, Mathias ^a   Eriksson, Ove ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Dioecy; Habitat fragmentation; Hand pollination; Pollen limitation; Seed sowing; Sex ratio

Indexed keywords

FLOWERING; HERB; PATCH SIZE; POLLEN LIMITATION; RECRUITMENT; SEED SET; SEEDLING ESTABLISHMENT; SEX RATIO; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

ANTENNARIA DIOICA; HEXAPODA;

EID: 35248866246     PISSN: 11956860     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2980/1195-6860(2007)14[387:SRMPLI]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (65)

1. Ågren, J., 1996. Population size, pollinator limitation, and seed set in the self-incompatible herb Lythrum salicaria. Ecology, 77: 1779-1790.
2. Ågren, J., T. Elmqvist & A. Tunlid, 1986. Pollination by deceit, floral sex-ratios and seed set in dioecious Rubus chamaemorus L. Oecologia, 70: 332-338.
3. Aizen, M. A., 1997. Influence of local floral density and sex ratio on pollen receipt and seed output: Empirical and experimental results in dichogamous Alstroemeria aurea (Alstroemeriaceae). Oecologia, 111: 404-412.
4. Aizen, M. A., L. Ashworth & L. Galetto, 2002. Reproductive success in fragmented habitats: Do compatibility systems and pollination specialization matter? Journal of Vegetation Science, 13: 885-892.
5. Aizen, M. A. & P. Feinsinger, 1994a. Forest fragmentation, pollination, and plant reproduction in a Chaco dry forest, Argentina. Ecology, 75: 330-351.
6. Aizen, M. A. & P. Feinsinger, 1994b. Habitat fragmentation, native insect pollinators, and feral honey-bees in Argentine Chaco Serrano. Ecological Applications, 4: 378-392.
7. Allen, G. A. & J. A. Antos, 1993. Sex-ratio variation in the dioecious shrub Oemleria cerasiformis. American Naturalist, 141: 537-553.
8. Asker, S. E. & L. Jerling, 1992, Apomixis in Plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
9. Barrett, S. C. H. & K. Helenurm, 1981. Floral sex ratios and life history in Aralia nudicaulis (Araliaceae). Evolution, 35: 752-762.
10. Bayer, R. J. & G. L. Stebbins, 1987. Chromosome numbers, patterns of distribution, and apomixis in Antennaria (Asteraceae, Inuleae). Systematic Botany, 12: 305-319.
11. Bernes, C., 1994. Biological Diversity in Sweden, Monitor 14. Solna, SE, Swedish Enviromnental Protection Agency.
12. Bierzychudek, P. & V. Eckhart, 1988. Spatial segregation of the sexes of dioecious plants. American Naturalist, 132: 34-43.
13. Bond, W J., 1994. Do mutualisms matter? Assessing the impact of pollinator and disperser disruption on plant extinction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 344: 83-90.
14. Buchman, S. L. & G. P. Nabhan, 1996. The Forgotten Pollinators. Island Press, Washington, DC.
15. Burd, M., 1994. Bateman principle and plant reproduction: The role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Botanical Review, 60: 83-139.
16. Carlsson-Granér, U., T. Elmqvist, J. Ågren, H. Gardfjell & P. Ingvarsson, 1998. Floral sex ratios, disease and seed set in dioecious Silene dioica. Journal of Ecology, 86: 79-91.
17. Cousins, S. A. O., H. Ohlson & O. Eriksson, 2007. Effects of historical and present fragmentation on plant species diversity in semi-natural grasslands in Swedish rural landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 22: 723-730.
18. Cox, P. A. & T. Elmqvist, 2000. Pollinator extinction in the Pacific Islands. Conservation Biology, 14: 1237-1239.
19. Cunningham, S. A., 2000. Depressed pollination in habitat fragments causes low fruit set. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 267: 1149-1152.
20. Dahlström, A., S. A. O. Cousins & O. Eriksson, 2006. The history (1620-2003) of land use, people and livestock, and the relationship to present plant species diversity in a rural landscape in Sweden. Environment and History, 12: 191-212.
21. Duncan, D. H., A. B. Nicotra, J. T. Wood & S. A. Cunningham, 2004. Plant isolation reduces outcross pollen receipt in a partially self-compatible herb. Journal of Ecology, 92: 977-985.
22. Ekstam, U. & N. Forshed, 1992, Om hävden upphör: kärlväxter som indikatorarter i ängs- och hagmarker (If grassland management ceases: Vascular plants as indicator species in meadows and pastures), Skötsel av naturtyper. Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm (in Swedish with English summary).
23. Elmqvist, T., J. Ågren & A. Tunlid, 1988. Sexual dimorphism and between-year variation in flowering, fruit-set and pollinator behavior in a boreal willow. Oikos, 53: 58-66.
24. Eriksson, O., 1993. Dynamics of genets in clonal plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 8: 313-316.
25. Eriksson, O., 1996. Population ecology and conservation: Some theoretical considerations with examples from the Nordic flora. Symbolae botanicae Upsalienses, 31: 159-167.
26. Eriksson, O., 1997. Colonization dynamics and relative abundance of three plant species (Antennaria dioica, Hieracium pilosella and Hypochoeris maculata) in dry semi-natural grasslands. Ecography, 20: 559-568.
27. Ghazoul, J., 2005. Pollen and seed dispersal among dispersed plants. Biological Reviews, 80: 413-443.
28. Gustavsson, Å., 1947. Apomixis in higher plants. Pt. III. Biotype and species formation. Lunds Universitets Årsskrift, 42-43: 1-370.
29. Harris, L. F. & S. D. Johnson, 2004. The consequences of habitat fragmentation for plant-pollinator mutualisms. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 24: 29-43.
30. Harrison, S., 1999. Native and alien species diversity at the local and regional scales in a grazed California grassland. Oecologia, 121: 99-106.
31. Harrison, S. & E. Bruna, 1999. Habitat fragmentation and large-scale conservation: What do we know for sure? Ecography, 22: 225-232.
32. House, S. M., 1992. Population density and fruit set in 3 dioecious tree species in Australian tropical rain forest. Journal of Ecology, 80: 57-69.
33. House, S. M., 1993. Pollination success in a population of dioecious rain forest trees. Oecologia, 96: 555-561.
34. Jacquemyn, H., R. Brys & M. Hermy, 2002. Patch occupancy, population size and reproductive success of a forest herb (Primula elatior) in a fragmented landscape. Oecologia, 130: 617-625.
35. Jennersten, O., 1988. Pollination in Dianthus deltoides (Caryophyllaceae): Effects of habitat fragmentation on visitation and seed set. Conservation Biology, 2: 359-366.
36. Johnson, S. D. & W. J. Bond, 1997. Evidence for widespread pollen limitation of fruiting success in Cape wildflowers. Oecologia, 109: 530-534.
37. Kunin,, W. E., 1993. Sex and the single mustard: Population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed set. Ecology, 74: 2145-2160.
38. Kunin, W. E., 1997. Population size and density effects in pollination: Pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaber. Journal of Ecology, 85: 225-234.
39. Larson, B. M. H. & S. C. H. Barrett, 2000. A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 69: 503-520.
40. Lid, J. & D. T. Lid, 2005, Norsk flora, 7th Edition. Norske Samlaget, Oslo (in Norwegian).
41. Lindborg, R. & O. Eriksson, 2004a. Effects of restoration on plant species richness and composition in Scandinavian semi-natural grasslands. Restoration Ecology, 12: 318-326.
42. Lindborg, R. & O. Eriksson, 2004b. Historical landscape connectivity affects present plant species diversity. Ecology, 85: 1840-1845.
43. Marlin, J. C. & W. E. LaBerge, 2001. The native bee fauna of Carlinville, Illinois, revisited after 75 years: A case for persistence. Conservation Ecology, 5: 9. [Online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol5/ iss1/art9/
44. Mustajärvi, K., P. Siikamäki, S. Rytkönen & A. Lammi, 2001. Consequences of plant population size and density for plant-pollinator interactions and plant performance. Journal of Ecology, 89: 80-87.
45. O'Connell, L. M. & C. G. Eckert, 1999. Differentiation in sexuality among populations of Antennaria parlinii (Asteraceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences, 160: 567-575.
46. Persson, K., 2005a. TUVA 2 - Databas från Ängs- och Betesmarksinventeringen 2002-2004 (Database from survey of semi-natural pastures and meadows 2002-2004). Jönköping, Jordbruksverket (in Swedish).
47. Persson, K., 2005b. Ängs- och betesmarksinventeringen 2002-2004 (Survey of semi-natural pastures and meadows). Jönköping, Jordbruksverket (in Swedish with English summary).
48. Pickering, C. M., A. Kirkwood & J. M. Arthur, 2003. Habitat and sex specific differences in the dioecious weed Acetosella vulgaris (Polygonaceae). Austral Ecology, 28: 396-403.
49. Pykälä, J., 2000. Mitigating human effects on European biodiversity through traditional animal husbandry. Conservation Biology, 14: 705-712.
50. Quinn, G. P. & M. J. Keough, 2002, Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
51. Rathcke, B. J. & E. S. Jules, 1993. Habitat fragmentation and plant pollinator interactions. Current Science, 65: 273-277.
52. Renner, S. S., 1998. Effects of habitat fragmentation on plant pollinator interactions in the tropics. Pages 339-360 in D. M. Newbery, H. H. T. Prins & D. N. D. Brown (eds.). Dynamics of Tropical Communities. Blackwell Science, London.
53. Rottenberg, A., 2000. A field survey of dioecious plants in Israel: Sex ratio in seven rare species. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 134: 439-442.
54. Roubik, D. W., 2001. Ups and downs in pollinator populations: When is there a decline? Conservation Ecology, 5: 2. [Online] URL: http:// www.conseco1.org/vol5/iss1/art2/
55. Rydberg, H. & H.-E. Wanntorp, 2001, Sörmlands flora. Botaniska Sällskapet i Stockholm, SBT, Uppsala (in Swedish).
56. Stehlik, I. & S. C. H. Barrett, 2005. Mechanisms governing sex-ratio variation in dioecious Rumex nivalis. Evolution, 59: 814-825.
57. Stehlik, I. & S. C. H. Barrett, 2006. Pollination intensity influences sex ratios in dioecious Rumex nivalis, a wind-pollinated plant. Evolution, 60: 1207-1214.
58. Sutherland, S., 1986. Floral sex-ratios, fruit-set, and resource allocation in plants. Ecology, 67: 991-1001.
59. Tutin, T. G., V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters & D. A. Webb, 1976. Flora Europaea, Vol. 4. Plantaginaceae to Compositae (and Rubiaceae). Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
60. Ubisch, G. V., 1930. Geschlechtsverteilung und secundäre Geschlechtsverhältnis bei Antennaria dioica. Biologisches Zentralblatt, 50: 532-540.
61. Vamosi, J. C. & S. M. Vamosi, 2005. Present day risk of extinction may exacerbate the lower species richness of dioecious clades. Diversity and Distributions, 11: 25-32.
62. Weppler, T., P. Stoll & J. Stöcklin, 2006. The relative importance of sexual and clonal reproduction for population growth in the long-lived alpine plant Geum reptans. Journal of Ecology, 94: 869-879.
63. Widén, B. & M. Widén, 1990. Pollen limitation and distance-dependent fecundity in females of the clonal gynodioecious herb Glechoma hederacea (Lamiaceae). Oecologia, 83: 191-196.
64. Willis, J. C. & I. H. Burkill, 1903. Flowers and insects of Great Britain, Part II. Annals of Botany, 17: 313-349.
65. Zimmerman, M. & G. H. Pyke, 1988. Reproduction in Polemonium: Assessing the factors limiting seed set. American Naturalist, 131: 723-738.