Practical experiences in the design and conduct of surveys in empirical software engineering

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2765, Issue , 2003, Pages 104-128

  Ciolkowski, Marcus ^a   Laitenberger, Oliver ^b   Vegas, Sira ^c   Biffl, Stefan ^d  

^a France   (Germany)

^b Droege and Comp GmbH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^d VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION;

CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; EXTERNAL VALIDITIES; HETEROGENEOUS SOURCES; LARGE SCALE SURVEYS; LITERATURE SURVEY; PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE;

SURVEYS;

EID: 35248857055     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45143-3_7     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Hays, W. L., Statistics for the social sciences, London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1977.
2. Robson, C., Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioners-Researchers, Blackwell, 1993.
3. Freimut, B., Punter, T., Biffl, S. and Ciolkowski, M., "State-of-the-Art in Empirical Studies," ViSEK Technical Report 007/E, 2002.
4. Ticehurst, G. and Veal, A., Business Research Methods: A Managerial Approach, Australia: Addison Wesley Longman, 1999.
5. Dybå, T., "Improvisation in small software organizations," IEEE Software, 17(5), pp. 82-87, September 2000.
6. Pagan, M. E., "Design and Code Inspections to Reduce Errors in Program Development," IBM Systems Journal, 15(3), pp. 182-211, 1976.
7. Kim, L. P. W., Sauer, C. and Jeffery, R., "Framework for Software Development Technical Reviews," Software Quality and Productivity: Theory, Practice, Education and Training, 1995.
8. Macdonald, F., Miller, J., Brooks, A., Roper, M. and Wood, M., "Applying Inspection to Object-Oriented Software," Software Testing, 6, pp. 61-82, 1996
9. Porter, A. A., Votta, L. G. and Basili, V. R., "Comparing Detection Methods for Software Requirements Inspections: A Replicated Experiment," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21(6), pp. 563-575, 1995.
10. Tjahjono, D., Exploring the effectiveness of formal technical review factor with CSRS, a collaborative software review system, PhD thesis, Department of Information and Computer Science, 1996.
11. Wheeler, D. A., Brykczynski, B. J. and Meeson, R. N., "Software Peer Reviews," in R. H. Thayer, ed., Software Engineering Project Management, IEEE Computer Society, 1997.
12. Laitenberger, O. and DeBaud, J., "An Encompassing Life-Cycle Centric Survey of Software Inspection," Journal of Systems and Software, 50 (1), 2000.
13. Freedman, D. P. and Weinberg, G. M., Handbook of Walkthroughs, Inspections, and Technical Reviews, New York: Dorset House Publishing, 1990.
14. Weinberg, G. M. and Freedman, D. P., "Reviews, Walkthroughs, and Inspections," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 12 (1), pp. 68-72, 1984.
15. Yourdon, E., Structured Walkthroughs, N.Y.: Prentice Hall, 4th edition, 1989.
16. Macdonald, F. and Miller, J., Modelling Software Inspection Methods for the Application of Tool Support, Technical Report RR-95-196 [EFoCS-16-95], University of Strathclyde, UK, 1995.
17. Basili, V. R., Caldiera, G. and Rombach, H. D., "Experience Factory," in J. J. Marciniak, ed., Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 469-476,1994.
18. Ropponen, J. and Lyytinen, K., "Components of software development risk: how to address them? A project manager survey",IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering", 26(6), 2000.
19. Basili, V. R., Caldiera, G. and Rombach, H. D., "Measurement," in J. J. Marciniak, ed., Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
20. Oppenheim, A., Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement, London: Pinter, 1992.
21. Salant, P. and Dillman, D. A., How to conduct your own survey?, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1994.
22. Paulk, M. C., Goldenson, D. and White, D. M., The 1999 Survey of High Maturity Organizations, Technical Report CMU/SEI-2000-SR-002, SEI, 2000.
23. European Software Institute, "1995/1996 Software excellence study. Summary of results", 1996.
24. Babbie, E., Survey Research Methods, Wadsworth, 1990.
25. Kitchenham, B., Pfleeger, S., Pickard, L., Jones, P., Hoaglin, D., El Emam, K. and Rosenberg, J., "Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28(8), pp. 721-734, 2002.
26. Ciolkowski, M., Shull, F. and Biffl, S., "A Family of Experiments to Investigate the Influence of Context on the Effect of Inspection Techniques," Empirical Assessment of Software Engineering (EASE), Keele, UK, 2002.
27. Laitenberger, O., Vegas, S. and Ciolkowski, M., The State of the Practice of Review and Inspection Technologies in Germany, Technical Report ViSEK/010/E, ViSEK, 2002.
28. Laitenberger, O., Leszak, M., Stoll, D. and Emam, K. E., "Evaluating a Model of Review Success Factors in an Industrial Setting," Proceedings of the International Symposium on Software Metrics, 1999.
29. Davis, F., "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, pp. 319-340, September 1989.
30. Assmann, D. and Kempkens, R., Tools for Measurement Support, Technical Report No. 97.00/E, Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering, December 2000.
31. Basili, V. R., Shull, F. and Lanubile, F., "Building Knowledge through Families of Experiments," Transactions on Software Engineering, 25 (4), pp. 456-473, 1999.
32. GfK; Fraunhofer IESE; Fraunhofer ISI, Analyse und Evaluation der Softwareentwicklung in Deutschland, Eine Studie für das Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (in German), 2000.
33. Ciolkowski, M. and Kalmar, R., Software-Reviews sind als Instrument zur Qualitätssicherung in der Industrie anerkannt, ViSEK Newsletter, 2002.