Strategies for the detection and analysis of space-time patterns of earthquakes on complex fault systems

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2659, Issue , 2003, Pages 827-836

  Rundle, John B ^a,b   Klein, William ^c,d   Tiampo, Kristy ^e,f,g   Donnellan, Andrea ^b   Fox, Geoffrey ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c Boston University   (United States)

^d LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^g UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^h INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKES; GEOPHYSICS;

COMPLEX FAULT SYSTEM; COMPUTATIONAL FORMULATIONS; COMPUTATIONAL TECHNIQUE; DYNAMICAL PROCESS; EARTHQUAKE FORECASTING; PATTERN DYNAMICS; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; THRESHOLD SYSTEMS;

FAULTING;

EID: 35248845385     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44863-2_81     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bakun, W and Lindh, A., The Parkfield, California earthquake prediction experiment, Science, 89, (1985) 3051-3058
2. Jones, L.M., Earthquake prediction: The interaction of public policy and science, Proc. Nat. Acad. USA, 93, (1996) 3721-3725
3. Lorenz, E.N., Deterministic nonperiodic flow, J. Atmos. Sci., 20, (1963) 130-141
4. Scholz, C.H., The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1990)
5. Rundle, J.B., Turcotte, D.L., ahd Klein, W., eds., Geocomplexity and the Physics of Earthquakes, Geophysical Monograph 120, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC (2000).
6. Rundle, P.B., Rundle, J.B., Tiampo, K.F., Martins, J.S.S., McGinnis, S., and Klein, W., Nonlinear network dynamics on earthquake fault systems, Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, (2001) 148501(1-4) (2001)
7. Ward, S.N., San Francisco bay area earthquake simulations, a step towards a standard physical model, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 90, (2000) 370-386
8. Zoback, M.L., 1st-order and 2nd-order patterns of stress in the lithosphere - The World Stress Map project, J. Geophys. Res., 97, (1992) 11703-11728
9. GEM home page, http://geodynamics.jpl.nasa.gov/gem/
10. ACES home page, http://quakes.earth.uq.edu.au/ACES/
11. Southern California Earthquake Center, http://www.scec.org/
12. Mora, P., ed., Proceedings of the 1st ACES Workshop, published by APEC Cooperation for Earthquake Simulation, Brisbane, Queensland, AU (1999).
13. Matsu'ura, M., Nakajima, K., and Mora, P., eds., Proceedings of the 2nd ACES Workshop, published by APEC Cooperation for Earthquake Simulation, Brisbane, Queensland, AU (2001).
14. Vicsek, T., Fractal Growth Phenomena, World Scientific, Singapore (1989).
15. Gouyet, J.-F., Physics and Fractal Structures, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1996).
16. Miller, S.A., Ben-Zion, Y., and Burg, J.P., A three-dimensional fluid-controlled earthquake model: Behavior and implications, J. Geophys. Res., 104, (1999) 10621-10638
17. Persson, B.N.J., Sliding Friction, Physical Principles and Applications (Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1998).
18. Rundle, J.B., Klein, W., Gross, S., and Ferguson, C.D., The traveling density wave model for earthquakes and driven threshold systems, Phys. Rev. E, 56, (1997) 293-307
19. Dieterich J.H., and Kilgore, B., Implications for fault constitutive properties for earthquake prediction, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 3787 (1996).
20. Dieterich, J.H., and Kilgore, B., Direct observation for frictional contacts - New insights for state-dependent properties, PAGEOPH, 143, 283-302 (1994).
21. Dieterich, J.H., Modeling of rock friction 1, Experimental results and constitutive equations, J. Geophys. Res., 84, (1979) 2161-2175
22. Rice, J.R., Lapusta, N., and Ranjith, K., Rate and state dependent friction and the stability of sliding between elastically deformable solids, J. Mech. Phys. Sol., 49, (200) 1865-1898
23. Ranjith, K. and J.R. Rice, J.R., Slip dynamics between at an interface between dissimilar materials, J. Mech. Phys. Sol., 49, (2001) 341-361
24. Ruina, A., Slip instability and state-variable friction laws, J. Geophys. Res., 88, (1983) 359-370
25. Tullis, T.E., Rock friction and its implications for earthquake prediction examined via models of Parkfield earthquakes, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci USA, 93, (1996) 3803-3810
26. Karner, S.L., and Marone, C., Effects of loading rate and normal stress on stress drop and stick slip recurrence interval, pp. 187-198 in Rundle, J.B., Turcotte, D.L., and Klein, W., eds., Geocomplexity and the Physics of Earthquakes, Geophysical Monograph 120, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC (2000).
27. Beeler, N.M., Tullis, T.E., and Blanpied, M.L., and Weeks, J.D., Frictional behavior of large displacement experimental faults, J. Geophys. Res., 101, (1996) 8697-8715
28. Rundle, J.B., Tiampo, K.F., Klein, W., Martins, J.S.S., Self-organization in leaky threshold systems: The influence of near mean field dynamics and its implications for earthquakes, neurobiology and forecasting, in press, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, (2001) 2463-2465
29. Klein, W., Rundle, J.B., and Ferguson, C.D., Scaling and nucleation in models of earthquake faults, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, (1997) 3793-3796
30. Particle Physics Data Grid, http://www.cacr.caltech.edu/ppdg/
31. GriPhyN Project Site, http://www.griphyn.org
32. NEES Earthquake Engineering Grid, http://www-meesgrod.org/
33. Resource Description Framework (RDF), http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/
34. Ninja Project, http://ninja.cs.berkeley.edu/
35. Semantic Web, http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/
36. The Grid Forum http://www.gridforum.org
37. Grid Forum Computing Environment Working Group, http://www.computingportals.org/cbp.html
38. Grid Message System, http://aspen.csit.fsu.edu/users/shrideep/mspaces/
39. General Review of Portals by G. Fox, http://aspen.csit.fsu.edu/collabtools/CollabReviewfeb25-01.html
40. Portals and Frameworks for Web-based Education and Computational Science, http://www.new-npac.org/users/fox/documents/pajavaapri100/
41. Gateway Computational Portal, http://www.gatewayportal.org
42. See talk by CCA lead Rob Armstrong of Sandia at LLNL meeting on Software Components July 2001 http://www.llnl.gov/CASC/workshops/components_2001/ viewgraphs/RobArmstrong.ppt
43. Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1 http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl.
44. Presentation on Web Services by Francesco Curbera of IBM at DoE Components Workshop July 23-25, 2001. Livermore, California. http://www.llnl.gov/CASC/workshops/components_2001/ viewgraphs/FranciscoCurbera.ppt
45. Doe Babel project http://www.llnl.gov/CASC/components/babel.html
46. IBM Web Services Invocation Framework http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/wsif
47. XML based messaging and protocol specifications SOAP. http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/.
48. W3C Resource Description Framework http://www.w3.org/RDF/
49. Sun Microsystems JXTA Peer to Peer technology, http://www.jxta.org.
50. Universal Description, Discovery and Integration Project http://www.uddi.org/
51. Semantic Web from W3C to describe self organizing Intelligence from enhanced web resources, http: //www.w3.org/2001/sw/.
52. W3C description of Naming and Addressing http://www.w3.org/Addressing/