Independence assumptions considered harmful

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 1997-July, Issue , 1997, Pages 182-189

  Franz, Alexander ^a  

^a SONY COMPUTER SCIENCE LABORATORIES INC   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; MODELING LANGUAGES;

'CURRENT; AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION; EXPLANATORY VARIABLES; INDEPENDENCE ASSUMPTION; MAIN EFFECT; SIMPLE++; STATISTICAL APPROACH; STATISTICAL LANGUAGE MODELLING;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 35248841591     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Agresti, Alan. 1990. Categorical Data Analysis. .John Wiley & Sons, New York.
2. Alshawi, Hiyan and David Carter. 1994. Training and scaling preference functions for disambiguation. Computational Linguistics, 20(4):635-648.
3. Bishop. Y. M., S. E. Fienberg, and P. W. Holland. 1975. Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Th,eory and Practice. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Charniak, Eugene, Curtis Hendrickson, Neil,Jacobson, and Mike Perkowitz. 1993. Equations for part-of-speech tagging. In AAAI-93, pages 784~ 789.
5. Church, Kenneth W. and Patrick Hanks. 1990. Worda,~soeiationn orms mutual information, and lexico graphy. Computational Linguistics, 16(1):22-29.
6. Crain, Stephen and Mark 3. Steedman. 1985. On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological syntax processor. In David R. Dowty, Lauri Karttunen, and Anrnold M. Zwicky, editors, Natural Language Parsing, pages 320-358, Cambridge, UK. Cambridge University Press.
7. de Marcken, Carl G. 1990. Parsing the LOB corpus. In Proceedings of ACL-90, pages 243-251.
8. Deming, W. E. and F. F. Stephan. 1940. On a lea.st squares adjustment of a sampled frequency table when the expected marginal totals are known. Ann. Math. Statis, (11):427-444.
9. Duda, Richard O. and Peter E. Hart. 1973. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
10. Fienberg, Stephen E. 1980. Th.eAnalysis of Cross-Classified Categorical Data. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, second edition edition.
11. Franz, Alexander. 1996. Automatic Ambiguity Resolution in Natural Language Processing. volume 1171 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
12. Gibson, Ted and Neal Pearhnutter. 1994. A corpusba,sed analysis of psycholinguistic constraints on PP attachment. In Charles Clifton Jr., Lyn Frazier, and Keith Rayner, editors, Perspectives on Sentence Processing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Hindle, Donald and Mats Rooth. 1993. Structural ambiguity and lexical relations. Computational Linguistics, 19(1):103-120.
14. Hirst, Graeme. 1986. Semantic Interpretation and the Resolution of Ambiguity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15. Marcus, Mitchell P., Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
16. Ratnaparkhi, Adwait, Jeff Bynar, and Salim Roukos. 1994. A maximum entropy model for Prepositional Phra,se attachment. In ARPA Workshop on Human Language Technology. Plainsboro, N.], March 8-11.
17. Weischedel, Ralph, Marie Meteer, Richard Schwartz, Lance Ramshaw, and Jeff Palmucci. 1993. Coping with ambiguity and unknown words through probabilistic models. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):359-382.