Fuel cycle efficiencies of different automotive on-board hydrogen storage options

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Volumn 32, Issue 15 SPEC. ISS., 2007, Pages 3592-3602

  Ahluwalia, R K ^a   Hua, T Q ^a   Peng, J K ^a  

^a ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chemical hydrogen storage; Fuel cycle efficiency; Hydrogen storage

Indexed keywords

ENERGY UTILIZATION; HYDROGEN PRODUCTION;

CHEMICAL HYDROGEN STORAGE; ENERGY FEEDSTOCK; FUEL CYCLE EFFICIENCIES;

HYDROGEN STORAGE;

EID: 35248840461     PISSN: 03603199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.03.021     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. US Department of Energy, Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies Program, Multi-Year Research, Development and Demonstration Plan, December 2005 〈www.hydrogen.energy.gov〉.
2. Wang MQ. GREET 1.7-transportation fuel-cycle model. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, December 2005.
3. DOE H 2 A Analysis, December 2005 〈www.hydrogen.energy.gov〉.
4. McClaine AW. Chemical hydride slurry for hydrogen production and storage. 2005 DOE hydrogen program review, Crystal City, VA, May 24-27; 2005.
5. Bossel U, Eliasson B, Taylor G. The future of the hydrogen economy: bright or bleak. Final Report, April 15; 2003.
6. Wu Y. Energy efficiency of sodium borohydride regeneration. DOE hydrogen storage program analysis group meeting, Argonne, IL, October 12; 2005.
7. Krishnan A., Liu X.G., and Pal U.B. Solid oxide membrane process for magnesium production directly from magnesium oxide. Metall Mater Trans B 36B (2003) 463-473
8. Pal UB. Personal Communications, September 2005.
9. Energy Information Administration, December 2005 〈www.eia.doe.gov〉.
10. Cooper A.C., Bagzis L.D., Campbell K.M., and Pez G.P. Hydrogen storage and delivery by reversible hydrogenation of liquid-phase hydrogen carriers. Am Chem Soc Div Fuel Chem 50 (2005) 271