Natural hybridization between Elymus repens and Elymus hispidus assessed by AFLP analysis

Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 225-234

  Szczepaniak, Magdalena ^a   Cieślak, Elzbieta ^a   Bednarek, Piotr T ^b  

^a W SZAFER INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Poland)

^b PLANT BREEDING AND ACCLIMATIZATION INSTITUTE NATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

Author keywords

AFLP; Elymus hispidus; Elymus repens; Elymus xmucronatus; Genetic variation; Pollen fertility; Unidirectional introgression

Indexed keywords

ELYMUS; ELYMUS REPENS; THINOPYRUM INTERMEDIUM;

EID: 35248837889     PISSN: 00016977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. ALLENDORF F.W., LEARY R.F., SPRUELL P., WENBURG J.K. 2001. The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 (11): 613-622.
2. ARNOLD M.L. 1997. Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 215 pp.
3. ASSADI M. 1995. Meiotic configuration and chromosome number in some Iranian species of Elymus L. and Agropyron Gaertner (Poaceae, Triticeae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 117: 159-168.
4. ASSADI M. 1998. Biosystematic studies of the Elymus hispidus (Poaceae: Triticeae) group in Iran. Nord. J. Bot. 18: 483-492.
5. ASSADI M., RUNEMARK H. 1995. Hybridisation, genomic constitution and generic delimitation in Elymus s.l. (Poaceae, Triticeae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 194: 189-205.
6. BARKWORTH M.E. 2000. Changing perceptions of the Triticeae. In: Grasses: Systematics and Evolution. Jacobs S.W.L. and Everett J. (eds). CSIRO, Melbourne, pp. 110-120.
7. BAUM B.R., ESTES J.R., GUPTA P.K. 1987. Assessment of the genomic system of classification in the Triticeae. Amer. J. Bot. 74: 1388-1395.
8. BEDNAREK P.T., CHWEDORZEWSKA K., KRÓLICZAK J., PUCHALSKI J., ZAWADA M. 1999. AFLP molecular markers as a tool for genetic variability studies of rye inbred lines. Biul. Inst. Hod. Aklim. Rośl. 211: 219-227.
9. BEISMANN H., BARKER J.H.A., KARP A., SPECK T. 1997. AFLP analysis sheds light on distribution of two Salix species and their hybrid along a natural gradient. Mol. Ecol. 6: 989-993.
10. BERCHTOLD G.F., OPIZ P.M. 1836. Oekonomisch-technische Flora Böhmens 1/2. J. H. Pospischil, Prag.
11. BROWN W.V., PRATT G.A. 1960. Hybridization and introgression in the grass genus Elymus. Amer. J. Bot. 47 (8): 669-676.
12. BURGESS K.S., MORGAN M., DEVERNO L., HUSBAND B.C. 2005. Asymmetrical introgression between two Morus species (M. alba, M. rubra) that differ in abundance. Mol. Ecol. 14 (11): 3471-3483.
13. CHOLER P., ERSCHBAMER B., TRIBSCH A., GIELLY L., TABERLET P. 2004. Genetic introgression as a potential to widen a species' niche: Insights from alpine Carex curvula. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (1): 171-176.
14. DIAZ O., SALOMON B., BOTHMER R. VON. 1999. Genetic diversity and structure in populations of Elymus caninus (L.) L., Poaceae. Hereditas 131: 63-74.
15. ELLSTRAND N.C., WHITKUS R., RIESEBERG L.H. 1996. Distribution of spontaneous plant hybrids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93: 5090-5093.
16. EXCOFFIER L., SMOUSE P.E., QUATTRO J.M. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479-491.
17. GOLDMAN D.H., JANSEN R.K., VAN DEN BERG C., LEITCH I.J., FAY M.F., CHASE M.W. 2004. Molecular and cytological examination of Calopogon (Orchidaceae, Epidendroideae): circumscription, phylogeny, polyploidy, and possible hybrid speciation. Am. J. Bot. 91 (5): 707-723.
18. GOWER J.C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53: 325-328.
19. GUO Y.P., SAUKEL J., MITTERMAYR R., EHRENDORFER F. 2005. AFLP analyses demonstrate genetic divergence, hybridization, and multiple polyploidization in the evolution of Achillea (Asteraceae-Anthemideae). New Phytol. 166: 273-290.
20. HEGARTY M.J., HISCOCK S.J. 2005. Hybrid speciation in plants: new insights from molecular studies. New Phytol. 165: 411-423.
21. HULTÉN E., FRIES M. 1986. Atlas of North European vascular plants. North of the Tropic of Cancer. 1. 498 pp., 3. 1172 pp. Koelz Scientific Books, Königstein.
22. KOVACH W.L. 1999. MVSP - A multi-variate statistical package for windows, ver. 3.1. Kovach computing Services, Penthraeth.
23. MAHELKA V., SUDA J., JAROLÍMOVÁ V., TRÁVNÍ ČEK P., KRAHULEC F. 2005. Genome size discriminates between closely related taxa Elytrigia repens and E. intermedia (Poaceae: Triticeae) and their hybrid. Folia Geobot. 40: 367-384.
24. MAHELKA V. 2006. Response to flooding intensity in Elytrigia repens, E. intermedia (Poaceae: Triticeae) and their hybrid. Weed Res. 46: 82-90.
25. MARHOLD K., LIHOVÁ J., PERNÝ M., GRUPE R., NEUFFER B. 2002. Natural hybridization in Cardamine (Brassicaceae) in the Pyrenees: evidence from morphological and molecular data. Bot. J. Lin. Soc. 139: 275-294.
26. MELDERIS A. 1980. Elymus L. In: Flora Europaea. 5. Alismataceae to Orchidaceae (Monocotyledones). Tutin T.G., Heywood V.H., Burges N.A., Moore D.M., Valentine D.H., Walters S.M., Webb D.A. (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 192-198.
27. MIZIANTY M., FREY L., SZCZEPANIAK M. 2001. The Agropyron-Elymus complex (Poaceae) in Poland: biosystematics. In: Studies on grasess in Poland. Prey L. (ed.). W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, pp. 25-77.
28. NEI M., LI W.H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 76: 5269-5273.
29. NELSON E.N., TYRL R.J. 1978. Hybridization and introgression between Elymus canadensis and Elymus virginicus (Poaceae). Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci. 58: 32-34.
30. PROKUDIN YU.N. 1940. Agropyrum tesquicolum Prokudin. In: Flora Republicae Sovieticae Socialisticae Ucrainicae. vol. 2. Bordzilovskii E.I. and Lavrenko E.M. (eds). Vidavnitstvo Akademii Nauk Ukrains'koi RSR, Kiev, pp. 339-340. (In Ukrainian)
31. PROKUDIN YU.N. 1982. Itogi kompleksnovo biosistematicheskovo izuchenia Elytrigia repens (Poaceae) [The results of composite biosystematical study of Elytrigia repens (Poaceae)]. Bot. Zhurn. 67 (2): 129-139. (in Russian with English summary)
32. PROKUDIN YU.N., DRULEVA I.V. 1971. Pro gibridnu prirodu piriju zaostrenogo (Elytrigia mucronata (Opiz) Prokudin) [On hybrid nature of Elytrigia mucronata (Opiz) Prokudin]. Ukr. Bot. Zhurn. 28 (6): 712-717. (in Ukrainian with English summary)
33. PROKUDIN YU.N., DRULEVA I.V. 1972. O gibridnoji prirode pyreja stepnogo (Elytrigia tesquicola Prokudin). Bot. Zhurn. 57 (5): 495-500. (in Russian)
34. RIESEBERG L.H. 1995. The role of hybridization in evolution: old wine in new skins. Amer. J. Bot. 82 (7): 944-953.
35. ROHLF F.J. 1993. NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system version 2.02j. Applied Biostatistics Inc., New York.
36. SALOMON B., LU B.-R. 1992. Genomic groups, morphology, and sectional delimitation in Eurasian Elymus (Poaceae, Triticeae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 180: 1-13.
37. SCHNEIDER S., ROESSLI D., EXCOFFIER L. 2000. Arlequin ver. 2.000: A software for population genetic data analysis. Genetic and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland (http://www.lgb.unige.ch/arlequin/).
38. SZCZEPANIAK M. 2001. The Agropyron-Elymus (Poaceae) complex in Poland: occurrence of the Elymus hispidus subsp. hispidus and subsp. barbulatus. In: Studies on grasess in Poland. Frey L. (ed.). W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, pp. 177-193.
39. SZCZEPANIAK M. 2002a. Morphological variability of Polish populations of Elymus repens from various habitats - preliminary report. Ecological Questions 2: 159-168.
40. SZCZEPANIAK M. 2002b. Biosystematyka Elymus repens (L.) Gould i Elymus hispidus (Opiz) Melderis w Polsce [Biosystematics of Elymus repens (L.) Gould and Elymus hispidus (Opiz) Melderis in Poland]. Mscr. of PhD Thesis, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, 181 pp. (in Polish)
41. SZCZEPANIAK M. 2003a. Krytyczne studia taksonomiczne nad Elymus repens (L.) Gould [The taxonomic studies of Elymus repens (L.) Gould]. In: Zastosowania metod statystycznych w badaniach naukowych II [Application of statistic methods in scientific studies]. StatSoft Polska. Kraków, pp. 65-73. (in Polish)
42. SZCZEPANIAK M. 2003b. Zmienność morfologiczna Elymus hispidus (Opiz) Melderis [Morphological variation of Elymus hispidus (Opiz) Melderis]. In: Zastosowania metod statystycznych w badaniach naukowych II [Application of statistic methods in scientific studies]. StatSoft Polska. Kraków, pp. 361-370. (in Polish)
43. SZCZEPANIAK M., CIEŚLAK E., BEDNAREK P.T. 2002. Morphological and AFLP variation of Elymus repens (L.) Gould (Poaceae). Cell. Mol. Biol. Letters 7 (2A): 547-558.
44. SZCZEPANIAK M., CIEŚLAK E. 2003. Assessment of genetic variation in Elymus repens and E. hispidus using AFLP markers and its implications for intraspecific taxonomy. In: Problems of grass biology. Frey L. (ed.). W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, pp. 271-286.
45. TEO L.L., KIEW R., SET O., LEE S.K., GAN Y.Y. 2002. Hybrid status of kuwini, Mangifera odorata Griff. (Anacardiaceae) verified by amplified fragment length polymorphism. Mol. Ecol. 11: 1465-1469.
46. TSVELEV N.N. 1976. Zlaki SSSR [Grasses of the USSR]. Izdatel'stvo Nauka, Leningrad, 788 pp. (In Russian).
47. VOS P., HOGERS R., BLEEKER M., REIJANS M., VAN DE LEE T., HORNES M., FRIJTERS A., POT J., PELEMAN J., KUIPER M., ZABEAU M. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucl. Acids Res. 23: 4407-4414.
48. WHITTALL J.B., HELLQUIST C.B., SCHNEIDER E.L., HODGES S.A. 2004. Cryptic species in an endangered pondweed community (Potamogeton, Potamogetonaceae) revealed by AFLP markers. Am. J. Bot. 91 (12): 2022-2029.
49. WISSEMANN V. 2005. Evolution by hybridisation. The influence of reticulate evolution on biosymmetrical patterns and processes in plants. Theory in Biosciences 123 (3): 223-233.
50. YEH F.C., YANG R.C., BOYLE T.B.J., YE Z.H., MAO J.X. 1997. Popgene, the user-friendly shareware for population genetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (http://www.ualberta.ca/∼fyeh/index.htm).
51. ZHOU R., SHI S., WU C.-I. 2005. Molecular criteria for determining new hybrid species - An application to the Sonneratia hybrids. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 35: 595-601.