Analysis of parenchymal texture properties in breast tomosynthesis images

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 6514, Issue PART 1, 2007, Pages

  Kontos, Despina ^a   Bakic, Predrag R ^a   Maidment, Andrew D A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer risk assessment; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Effect of physical imaging parameters; Feature extraction; Mammography; Parenchymal texture; Quantitative image analysis

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER RISK ASSESSMENT; BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS IMAGES; GAIL-MODEL CANCER RISK; PARENCHYMAL TEXTURE PROPERTIES; X-RAY IMAGING MODALITY;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; DOSIMETERS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIATION; X RAY SCATTERING;

ONCOLOGY;

EID: 35248830119     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.713851     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Wolfe JN. Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographie parenchymal pattern. Cancer (Phila.) 1976; 37:2486-2492.
2. Wolfe JN. Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. American Journal of Roentgenology 1976; 126:1130-1139.
3. Greendale GA, Reboussin BA, Slone S, Wasilauskas C, Pike MC, Ursin G. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and change in mammographic density. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2003; 95:30-37.
4. Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1995; 87:1622-1629.
5. Li H, Giger ML, Olopade OI, Margolis A, Lan L, Chinander MR. Computerized Texture Analysis of Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns of Digitized Mammograms. Academic Radiology 2005; 12:863-873.
6. Huo Z., Giger M.L. WDE, Zhong W., Cumming S., Olopade O.I. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection. Medical Physics 2000; 27:4-12.
7. Li H, Giger ML, Huo Z, et al. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location. Medical Physics 2004; 31:549-555.
8. Yaffe MJ, Boyd NF, Byng JW, et al. Breast cancer risk and measured mammographic density. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 1998; 7 (suppl 1):S47-S55.
9. Yaffe M, Boyd N. Mammographic breast density and cancer risk: the radiological view. Gynecological Endocrinology 2005; 2005:6-11.
10. Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE, et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 1997; 205:399-406.
11. Rafferty EA. Tomosynthesis: New Weapon in Breast Cancer Fight. Decisions in Imaging Economics 2004; 17.
12. Wu T, Moore RH, Rafferty EA, Kopans DA. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis. Medical Physics 2004; 31:2636-2647.
13. Huo Z, Giger ML, Olopade OI, et al. Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. Radiology 2002; 225:519-526.
14. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1989; 81:1879-1886.
15. Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD. Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer: Implications for risk prediction. Cancer (N.Y.) 1993; 73:643-651.
16. The RSNA Medical Imaging Resource Center (MIRC), http://www.rsna.org/ mirc/ (last accesed February 7, 2007).
17. Caldwell CB, Stapleton SJ, Hodsworth DW, et al. Characterisation of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension. Physics in Medicine and Biololgy 1990; 35:235-247.
18. Amadasum M, King R. Textural features corresponding to textural properties. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics 1989; 19:1264-1274.
19. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1973; 3:610-621.
20. Petrie A, Sabin C. Medical Statistics at a Glance: Blackwell Publishing, 2000.