Integrated measurement for the evaluation and improvement of software processes

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2786, Issue , 2003, Pages 94-111

  García, Félix ^a   Ruiz, Francisco ^a   Cruz, José Antonio ^a   Piattini, Mario ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; EVALUATION AND IMPROVEMENT; INTEGRATED MEASUREMENTS; MEASUREMENT PROCESS; SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; SOFTWARE PROCESS MODELING; SOFTWARE PRODUCTS;

PROCESS ENGINEERING;

EID: 35248825098     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45189-1_8     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Pfleeger, S.L.: Integrating Process and Measurement. In Software Measurement. A. Melton (ed). London. International Thomson Computer Press (1996) 53-74
2. Jacobson, I, G. Booch and J. Rumbaugh,. The Unified Software Development Process. Addison Wesley(1999)
3. Calero, C., Piattini, M. and Genero, M.: Empirical Validation of referential metrics. Information Software and Technology". Special Issue on Controlled Experiments in Software Technology. Vol.43, No 15 (2001)
4. Derniame, J.C., Kaba, B.A. and Wastell, D.: Software Process: Principles, methodology and technology. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1500. Springer (1999)
5. Díaz, O., Piattini, M. and Calero, C.: Measuring triggering-interaction complexity on active databases. Information Systems Journal. Elsevier Science. Vol. 26, No 1 (2001)
6. Florac, W. A. and Carleton, A.D.: Measuring the Software Process. Statistical Process Control for Software Process Improvement. SEI Series in Software Engineering. Addison Wesley (1999).
7. García, F., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M. and Polo, M.: Conceptual Architecture for the Assessment and Improvement of Software Maintenance. 4th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS'02). Ciudad Real, Spain, April (2002), 610-617
8. Genero, M., Olivas, J., Piattini, M. and Romero, F.: Using metrics to predict OO information systems maintainability. 13th International Conference Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE'01), (2001), 388-401
9. Genero, M., Miranda, D. and Piattini, M.: Defining and Validating Metrics for UML Statechart Diagrams. 6th International ECOOP Workshop on Quantitative Approaches in Object-Oriented Software Engineering (QAOOSE), (2002), 120-136
10. ISO/IEC: ISO IEC 15504 TR2:1998, part 2: A reference model for processes and process capability, (1998)
11. ISO IEC 15939, Information Technology - Sotware Measurement Process, Committee Draft, December (2000)
12. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Quality management systems - Fundamentals and vocabulary. ISO 9000:2000, (2000). See http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/iso9000-14000/iso9000/selection_use/iso9000family.html
13. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 2000. Quality management systems - Requirements ISO 9001:2000, (2000)
14. Kitchenham, B. A., Hughes, R.T. and Linkman, S.G.: Modeling Software Measurement Data. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 27(9), (2001), 788-804
15. OMG Unified Modeling Language Specification; version 1.4, Object Management Group. September (2001). Available in http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/uml.htm
16. Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification; version 1.4. Object Management Group. April (2002). In http://www.omg.org/technology/ documents/formal/mof.htm
17. Software Process Engineering Metamodel Specification; adopted specification, version 1.0. Object Management Group. November (2002). Available in http://cgi.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ptc/02-05-03.
18. OMG XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) Specification; version 1.2. Object Management Group. January (2002). In http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/xmi.htm
19. Piattini, M., Calero, C., Sahraoui, H. and Lonis, H.: Object-Relational Database Metrics. L'object. ISSN 1262-1137. HERMES Science Publications, Paris. Vol.7, No 4, (2001)
20. Ruiz, F., Piattini, M. and Polo, M. An Conceptual Architecture Proposal for Software Maintenance. International Symposium on Systems Integration (ISSI, Intersymp'2001). Baden-Baden, Germany (2001), VIII:1-8
21. Ruiz, F., Piattini, M., García, F. and Polo, M. An XMI-based Repository for Software Process Metamodeling. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES'2002). Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 2559), Markku Oivo, Seija Komi-Sirviö (Eds.). Springer. Rovaniemi (Finland). December (2002), 546-558
22. Software Engineering Institute (SEI). The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process, (1995). In http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmm/cmm.html
23. SM), version 1.1. March (2002). In http://www.sei.cmu/cmmi/cmmi.html