Evaluation of blade-strike models for estimating the biological performance of Kaplan turbines

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 208, Issue 2-4, 2007, Pages 165-176

  Deng, Zhiqun ^a   Carlson, Thomas J ^a   Ploskey, Gene R ^a   Richmond, Marshall C ^a   Dauble, Dennis D ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bio index testing; Blade strike modeling; Fish injury; Fish friendly turbine

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY; TURBINES;

BIO-INDEX TESTING; BLADE-STRIKE MODELING; FISH INJURY; FISH-FRIENDLY TURBINE;

ECOLOGY;

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INDEX METHOD; INJURY; NUMERICAL MODEL; POWER PLANT; SALMONID; STOCHASTICITY; SURVIVAL; TURBINE;

BONNEVILLE DAM; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS;

EID: 35248822155     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.05.019     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bell, M.C., 1981. Updated Compendium of the Success of Passage of Small Fish Through Turbines. Technical Report, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, North Pacific Division, Portland, Oregon.
2. Bell, M.C., 1991. Revised Compendium of the Success of Passage of Small Fish Through Turbines. Technical Report, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, North Pacific Division, Portland, Oregon.
3. Cada G.F. The development of advanced hydroelectric turbines to improve fish passage survival. Fisheries 26 9 (2001) 14-23
4. Cada, G.F., Coutant, C.C., Whitney, R.R., 1997. Development of Biological Criteria for the Design of Advanced Hydroturbines. Technical Report DOE/ID-10578, U.S. Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office, Idaho Falls, Idaho.
5. Chaumot A., Milioni N., Abdoli A., Pont D., and Charles S. First step of a modeling approach to evaluate spatial heterogeneity in a fish (Cottus gobio) population dynamics. Ecol. Modell. 197 (2006) 263-273
6. Coutant C.C., and Whitney R.R. Fish behavior in relation to passage through hydropower turbines: a review. Trans. Am. Fisheries Soc. 129 2 (2000) 351-380
7. Deng Z., Guensch G.R., McKinstry C.A., Mueller R.P., Dauble D.D., and Richmond M.C. Evaluation of fish-injury mechanisms during exposure to turbulent shear flow. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci. 62 7 (2005) 1513-1522
8. Eicher, G.J., Campbell, C.J., Craven, R.E., West, M.A., 1987. Turbine Related Fish Mortality: Review and Evaluation of Studies. Technical Report EPRI AP-5480, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California.
9. Goodwin R.A., Nestler O.M., Anderson J.J., Weber L.J., and Loucks D.P. Forecasting 3-d fish movement behavior using a Eulerian-Lagrangian-agent method (ELAM). Ecol. Modell. 192 (2006) 197-223
10. Hecker G.E. An approach to predicting fish survival for advanced technology turbines. Hydro Rev. 24 7 (2005) 36-43
11. Heisey P.G., Mathur D., and Rineer T. A reliable tag recapture technique for estimating turbine passage survival - application to young-of-the-year american shad (Alosa sapidissima). Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci. 49 9 (1992) 1826-1834
12. Mathur D., Heisey P.G., Euston E.T., Skalski J.R., and Hays S. Turbine passage survival estimation for chinook salmon smolts (oncorhynchus tshawytscha) at a large dam on the columbia river. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci. 53 3 (1996) 542-549
13. Mathur D., Heisey P.G., Skalski J.R., and Kenney D.R. Salmonid smolt survival relative to turbine efficiency and entrainment depth in hydroelectric power generation. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 36 4 (2000) 737-747
14. Monten E. Fish and Turbines: Fish Injuries During Passage Through Power Station Turbines (1985), Vattenfall, Stockholm, Sweden
15. Neitzel D.A., Dauble D.D., Cada G.F., Richmond M.C., Guensch G.R., Mueller R.R., Abernethy C.S., and Amidan B. Survival estimates for juvenile fish subjected to a laboratory-generated shear environment. Trans. Am. Fisheries Soc. 133 2 (2004) 447-454
16. Inc. Normandeau Associates, J.R. Skalski, Inc. Mid-Columbia Consulting, 2000. Direct Survival and Condition of Juvenile Chinook Salmon Passed Through an Existing and New Minimum Gap Runner Turbines at Bonneville Dam First Powerhouse, Columbia River. Technical Report, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District, Portland, Oregon.
17. Odeh M., and Sommers G. New design concepts for fish friendly turbines. Int. J. Hydropower Dams 73 3 (2000) 64-71
18. Scheibe T.D., and Richmond M.C. Fish individual-based numerical simulator (fins): a particle-based model of juvenile salmonid movement and dissolved gas exposure history in the Columbia River basin. Ecol. Modell. 147 3 (2002) 233-252
19. Skalski J.R., Mathur D., and Heisey P.G. Effects of turbine operating efficiency on smolt passage survival. North Am. J. Fisheries Manage. 22 4 (2002) 1193-1200
20. Solomon, D.J., 1988. Fish Passage Through Tidal Energy Barrages. Technical Report ETSU TID4056, Energy Technology Support Unit, Harwell, United Kingdom.
21. Stefan H.G., Hondzo M., Eaton J.G., and McCormick J.H. Validation of a fish habitat model for lakes. Ecol. Modell. 82 (1995) 211-224
22. Turnpenny A.W.H. Mechanisms of fish damage in low-head turbines: an experimental appraisal. In: Jungwirth M., Schmutz S., and Weiss S. (Eds). Fish Migration and Fish Bypasses (1998), Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, United Kingdom pp. 300-314
23. Turnpenny, A.W.H., Clough, S., Hanson, K.P., Ramsay, R., McEwan, D., 2000. Risk Assessment for Fish Passage Through Small, Low-Head Turbines. Technical Report ETSUH/06/00054/REP, Energy Technology Support Unit, Harwell, United Kingdom
24. USACE, 2004. Turbine Survival Program Phase 1 Report, 1997-2002. Technical report, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
25. Von Raben K. Regarding the problem of mutilations of fishes by hydraulic turbines. Die Wasserwirtschaft 4 (1957) 97-100
26. Van Winkle W., Jager H.I., Railsback S.F., Holcomb B.D., Studley T.K., and Baldrige J.E. Individual-based model of sympatric populations of brown and rainbow trout for instream flow assessment: model description and calibration. Ecol. Modell. 110 (1998) 175-207
27. Wittinger, R.J., Ramirez, D., 2000. Bonneville Dam First Powerhouse, Unit 5 and 6 Biological Test, November 1999-January 2000. Turbine Operating Conditions. Technical Report, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District, Portland, Oregon.