Dynamics of the auditory comprehension of prefixed words: Cohort entropies and conditional root uniqueness points

Mental Lexicon

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 125-146

  Wurm1, Lee H ^a   Ernestus, Mirjam ^b   Schreuder, Robert ^c   Baayen, R Harald ^b,c  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35248818990     PISSN: 18711340     EISSN: 18711375     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/ml.1.1.08wur     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Baayen, R.H. (2005). Data mining at the intersection of psychology and linguistics. To appear in A. Cutler (Ed.), Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones (pp. 69-83). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Baayen, R. H., McQueen, J., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (2003). Frequency effects in regular inflectional morphology: Revisiting Dutch plurals. In R.H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 355-390). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
3. Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (CDROM). Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
4. Baayen, R.H., Tweedie, F.J., & Schreuder, R. (2002). The subjects as a simple random effect fallacy: Subject variability and morphological family effects in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 81, 55-65.
5. Bates, D.M. (2005). Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News, 5, 27-30.
6. Bates, D.M., & Sarkar, D. (2005). The lme4 library. .
7. Bertram, R., Baayen, R.H., & Schreuder, R. (2000). Effects of family size for complex words. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 390-405.
8. Cleveland, W.S. (1993). Visualizing data. Summit, NJ: Hobart Press.
9. de Jong, N.H., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H. (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 329-365.
10. Gaskell, M.G., & Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1997). Integrating form and meaning: A distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 613-656.
11. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A.M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
12. Harrell, F.E. (2001). Regression modeling strategies. New York: Springer.
13. Kemps, R., Wurm, L.H., Ernestus, M., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H. (2005). Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: Comparatives and agent nouns in Dutch and English. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 43-73.
14. Kostic, A., Markovic, T., & Baucal, A. (2003). Inflectional morphology and word meaning: Orthogonal or co-implicative cognitive domains? In R.H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 1-43). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
15. Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1984). Function and process in spoken word recognition. In H. Bouma & D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance: Control of language processes (vol. X, pp. 125-150). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102.
17. Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1989). Access and integration: Projecting sound onto meaning. In W.D. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and processing (pp.3-24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.
19. Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Kostic, A., & Baayen, R.H. (2004). Putting the bits together: An information theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition, 94, 1-18.
20. Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
21. Pinheiro, J.C., & Bates, D.M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer.
22. Rubenstein, H., & Pollack, I. (1963). Word predictability and intelligibility. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 147-158.
23. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 118-139.
24. Taft, M., Hambly, G., & Kinoshita, S. (1986). Visual and auditory recognition of prefixed words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 351-366.
25. Tyler, L.K., Marslen-Wilson, W.D., Rentoul, J., & Hanney, P. (1988). Continuous and discontinuous access in spoken word-recognition: The role of derivational prefixes. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 368-381.
26. Tyler, L.K., Moss, H.E., Galpin, A., & Voice, J.K. (2002). Activating meaning in time: The role of imageability and form-class. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 471-502.
27. Wurm, L.H. (1997). Auditory processing of prefixed English words is both continuous and decompositional. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 438-461.
28. Wurm, L.H. (2000). Auditory processing of polymorphemic pseudowords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 255-271.
29. Wurm, L.H., & Aycock, J. (2003). Recognition of spoken prefixed words: The role of early Conditional Root Uniqueness Points. In R.H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 259-286). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
30. Wurm, L.H., Baayen, R.H., & Aycock, J. (2005). Surface frequency effects below the threshold: Comparing types, tasks, and modalities. Manuscript submitted for publication.
31. Wurm, L.H., & Ross, S.E. (2001). Conditional root uniqueness points: Psychological validity and perceptual consequences. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 39-57.