When is evolutionary branching in predator-prey systems possible with an explicit carrying capacity?

Mathematical Biosciences

Volumn 210, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-16

  Hoyle, Andrew ^a   Bowers, Roger G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptive dynamics; Carrying capacity; Functional response; Predator prey; Trade off

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ADAPTIVE DYNAMICS; CARRYING CAPACITY; FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE; PREDATOR-PREY; TRADE-OFF;

EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS;

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; EVOLUTION; FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE; GROWTH RATE; POPULATION DENSITY; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

ARTICLE; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NONHUMAN; POPULATION DENSITY; PREDATION; PREDATOR PREY INTERACTION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; FOOD CHAIN; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUTATION;

EID: 35248818824     PISSN: 00255564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2007.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bowers R.G., White A., Boots M., Geritz S.A.H., and Kisdi E. Evolutionary branching/speciation: contrasting results from systems with explicit or emergent carrying capacities. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5 (2003) 883
2. Kuno E. Some strange properties of the logistic equation defined with r and K: inherent defects or artefacts?. Res. Pop. Ecol. 33 (1991) 33
3. Fulda J.S. Evolutionary and continuous stability. J. Theor. Biol. 91 (1981) 255
4. Pollard E. Resource limited and equilibrium models of populations. Oecologia 49 (1981) 377
5. Ginzburg L.R. Evolutionary consequences of basic growth equations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7 (1992) 133
6. Gabriel J.P., Saucy F., and Bersier L.F. Paradoxes in the logistic equation?. Ecol. Model. 185 (2005) 147
7. Meyer P.S., and Ausbel J.H. Carrying capacities: a model with logistically varying results. J. Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change 61 (1999) 209
8. Geritz S.A.H., Kisdi E., Meszena G., and Metz J.A.J. Evolutionary singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. J. Evol. Ecol. 12 (1998) 35
9. J.A.J. Metz, S.A.H. Geritz, G. Meszena, F.J.A. Jacobs, J.S. Van Heerwaarden, Adaptive dynamics: a geometric study of the consequences of nearly faithful reproduction, in: S.J. Van Strien, S.M. Verduyn Lunel (Eds.), Stochastic and Spatial Structures of Dynamical Systems, Elsevier, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1996, pp. 183.
10. Holling C.S. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Can. Entomol. 91 (1959) 293
11. Tanube K., and Namba T. Omnivory creates chaos in simple food web models. Ecology 86 (2005) 3411
12. Stearns S.C. The Evolution of Life Histories (1992), Oxford University, Oxford
13. Kisdi E., and Liu S. Evolution of handling time can destroy the coexistence of cycling predators. J. Evol. Ecol. 19 (2006) 49
14. Boots M., and Haraguchi Y. The evolution of costly resistance in host-parasite systems. Am. Nat. 153 (1999) 359
15. Boots M., and Bowers R.G. The evolution of resistance through costly acquired immunity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271 (2004) 715
16. Bowers R.G., and White A. The adaptive dynamics of Lotka-Volterra systems with trade-offs. Math. Biosci. 175 (2002) 67
17. Bowers R.G., Hoyle A., White A., and Boots M. The geometric theory of adaptive evolution: trade-off and invasion plots. J. Theor. Biol. 233 (2005) 363
18. Begon M., Harper J.L., and Townsend C.R. Ecology: Individual, Populations and Communities (1996), Blackwell Scientific, Oxford
19. Kisdi E. Long-term adaptive diversity in Levene-type models. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3 (2001) 721