Use of support vector machines in recognition of fork branches of the standing trees

ICIEA 2007: 2007 Second IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 783-786

  Kan, Jiangming ^a   Li, Wenbin ^a   Gao, Kai ^a  

^a BEIJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Automatic pruning; Fork branch; Intelligent pruning robot; Recognition; Support Vector Machine (SVM)

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER VISION; INTELLIGENT ROBOTS; OBJECT RECOGNITION; RANDOM PROCESSES;

AUTOMATIC PRUNING; FORK BRANCH; INTELLIGENT PRUNING ROBOTS; SPECIFICITY;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 35248816505     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICIEA.2007.4318514     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. ZHANG Junmei, LI Wenbin et al, Development on wireless remote control, system of pruning robot of commercial plantation. Beijing Forestry Machinery and Woodworking Equipment, 2003, 31(10), pp.7-9
2. Kan Jiangming, Li Wenbin, Method of tree image segmentation based on mathematical morphology. Beijing: journal of Beijing Forestry University, in press.
3. ZHANG Yuijn, Image segmentation. Beijing: Science Press, 2001, pp.122-23.
4. Sun Renshan, Study on machine vision identification for standing tree branches and trunks, Beijing: Beijing Forestry University. 2006, 6, pp.33-45
5. Zhang Xuegong, Introduction to statistical learning theory and support vector machines. Beijing: ACTA AUTOMATICA SINICA, 2000, 26(1), pp.32-42.
6. Lu Zhenbo, Zhang Xinhua, Kang Chunyu, Underwater target recognition based on support vector machine, Shenyang : INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 2003 , z1,pp.739-742.
7. Vapnik V N. The nature of statistical learning theory, New-York: Springer-Verlag, 1995.
8. Stanley J R. Blur Identification by the Method of Generalized Cross-Validation, IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 1992, 1, pp. 301-311
9. Nihal Fatma Guler, Sabri Kocer, Use of Support Vector Machines and Neural Network in Diagnosis of Neuromuscular Disorders, Journal of Medical Systems Vol. 29, No.3, June 2005
10. Boser, B.E., Guyon, I.M. and Vapnik, V. A. training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, Pittsburgh, 1992. ACM.
11. Schölkopf, B., Sung, K., Burges, C., Girosi, F., Niyogi, P., Poggio, T. and Vapnik. V. Comparing support vector machines with Gaussian kernels to radial basis function classifiers. IEEE Trans. Sign. Processing, 45:2758-2765, 1997.
12. Schölkopf, B., Burges, C. and Vapnik, V. Incorporating invariance in support vector learning machines. In C. vonder Malsburg, W. von Seelen, J. C. Vorbruggen, and B. Sendhoff, editors, Artificial Neural Networks - ICANN'96, pages 47-52, Berlin, 1996. Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1112.
13. Schölkopf, B., Simard, P., Smola, A. and Vapnik, V. Prior knowledge in support vector kernels. In M. Jordan, M. Kearns, and S. Solla, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 10, Cambridge, MA, 1998. MIT Press.
14. Schölkopf, B., Smola, A., Müller, K.-R., Burges, C.J.C. and Vapnik, V. Support vector methods in learning and feature extraction. In Ninth Australian Congress on Neural Networks, 1998.
15. Schölkopf, B., Smola, A. andMüller, K.-R. Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. Neural Computation, 1998.