Viewpoint for maintaining UML models against application changes

ICSOFT 2006 - 1st International Conference on Software and Data Technologies, Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 263-268

  Cazzola, Walter ^a   Ghoneim, Ahmed ^b   Saake, Gunter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automatic evolution and documentation; Design and code coherence; Software evolution; UML

Indexed keywords

UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

AUTOMATIC EVOLUTION; DESIGN INFORMATION; DESIGN MODELS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPER; SOFTWARE EVOLUTION; SYSTEM ADMINISTRATORS; SYSTEM CHANGE; UML DIAGRAMS;

DESIGN;

EID: 35248815078     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., and Jacobson, I. (1999). The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Object Technology Series. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, third edition.
2. Cazzola, W., Ghoneim, A., and Saake, G. (2004). Software Evolution through Dynamic Adaptation of Its OO Design. In Ehrich, H.-D., Meyer, J.-J., and Ryan, M. D., editors, Objects, Agents and Features: Structuring Mechanisms for Contemporary Software, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2975, pages 69-84. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
3. Cazzola, W., Pini, S., and Ancona, M. (2005). The Role of Design Information in Software Evolution. In Proceedings of the 2nd ECOOP Workshop on Reflection, AOP and Meta-Data for Software Evolution (RAMSE' 05), in 19th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP'05), pages 59-70, Glasgow, Scotland.
4. Chiorean, D., Paşca, M., Cârcu, A., Botiza, C., and Moldovan, S. (2004). Ensuring UML Models Consistency Using the OCL Environment. Electronic Notes Theoretical Computer Science, 102:99-110.
5. Lehman, M. M., Kahen, G., and Ramil, J. F. (2002). Behavioural Modelling of Long-Lived Evolution Processes - Some Issues and an Example. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution, 14(5):335-351.
6. Lehman, M. M. and Ramil, J. F. (2003). Software Evolution - Background, Theory, Practice. Information Processing Letters, 88(1-2):33-44.
7. Mehner, K. (2002). JaVis: A UML-Based Visualization and Debugging Environment for Concurrent Java Programs. In Revised Lectures on Software Visualization, International Seminar, LNCS 2269, pages 163-175, Dagstuhl Castle, Germany. Springer.
8. Sunyé, G., Pollet, D., Le Traon, Y., and Jézéquel, J.-M. (2001). Refactoring UML Models. In Gogolla, M. and Kobryn, C., editors, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language (≪UML'01≫), LNCS 2185, pages 134-148, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
9. Van Der Straeten, R., Mens, T., Simmonds, J., and Jonckers, V. (2003). Using Description Logic to Maintain Consistency between UML Models. In Stevens, P., Whittle, J., and Booch, G., editors, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language (≪UML'03≫), LNCS 2863, pages 326-340, San Francisco, CA, USA. Springer.
10. Yoder, J. W. and Johnson, R. E. (2002). The Adaptive Object-Model Architectural Style. In Bosch, J., Gentleman, W. M., Hofmeister, C., and Kuusela, J., editors, Proceedings of the 3rd Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA'02), volume 224 of IFIP Conference Proceedings, pages 3-27. Kluwer.