BioFoot® in-shoe system: Normal values and assessment of the reliability and repeatability

Foot

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 190-196

  Martínez Nova, Alfonso ^a   Cuevas García, José Carlos ^a   Pascual Huerta, Javier ^a   Sánchez Rodríguez, Raquel ^a  

^a Centro Universitario de Plasencia   (Spain)

Author keywords

BioFoot ; In shoe system; Normal pressures; Reliability; Repeatability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; FOOT; FOREFOOT; HALLUX; HEEL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; METATARSAL BONE; NORMAL HUMAN; NORMAL VALUE; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SHOE; TOE; VOLUNTEER; WALKING;

EID: 35248813784     PISSN: 09582592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2007.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Hurkmans H.L., Bussmann J.B., Benda E., Verhaar J.A., and Stam H.J. Accuracy and repeatability of the Pedar Mobile system in long-term vertical force measurements. Gait Posture 23 1 (2006) 118-125
2. Hurkmans H.L., Bussmann J.B., Selles R.W., Horemans H.L., Benda E., Stam H.J., et al. Validity of the Pedar Mobile system for vertical force measurement during a seven-hour period. J Biomech 39 1 (2006) 110-118
3. ® in-shoe system: Repeatability and normal pressure values. Gait Posture 25 3 (2007) 401-405
4. Quesada P., Rash G., and Jarboe N. Assessment of pedar and F-Scan revisited. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 12 3 (1997) S15
5. Soler C. BiofooT/Ibv 2001. Plantillas instrumentadas con telemetría, un nuevo paso en el estudio del pie. Rev Biomecánica 33 (2001) 27-29
6. Alemany S., García I., Alcántara E., González J.C., and Castillo L. Integration of plantar pressure measurements in a finite element model for the optimization of shankpiece design for high-heeled shoes. 6th Symposium of Footwear Biomechanics. New Zealand (2003)
7. Dueñas L., Ferrandis R., Martinez A., Candel J., Arnau F., and Villanueva J. Application of biomechanics to the prevention of overload injuries in elite football players. XXth International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. Cáceres (2002)
8. Sánchez-Rodríguez R., Martínez-Nova A., Querol-Martínez E., Crespo Martínez A., and Cuevas García J. Estudio comparativo del diseño de cuatro tratamientos ortopodológicos para la descarga de la segunda cabeza metatarsal. Rev Esp Podol 17 4 (2006) 146-149
9. Lafuente R., Doñate J.J., Poveda R., García A., Soler C., Belda J.M., et al. Valoración evolutiva de fracturas de calcáneo mediante el análisis biomecánico de la marcha. Análisis de resultados. Mapfre Med 13 4 (2002) 275-283
10. Hughes J., Pratt I., Linge K., Clarke K., and Klenerman L. The reliability of pressure measurements: the EMED F system. Clin Biomech 6 (1991) 14-18
11. Tudor-Locke C., and Bassett Jr. D.R. How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health. Sports Med 34 1 (2004) 1-8
12. Lee D.N. Visuo-motor coordination in space time (1980), Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam
13. Randolph A.L., Nelson M., Akkapeddi S., Levin A., and Alexandrescu R. Reliability of measurements of pressures applied on the foot during walking by a computerized insole sensor system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81 5 (2000) 573-578
14. Ahroni J.H., Boyko E.J., and Forsberg R. Reliability of F-Scan in-shoe measurements of plantar pressure. Foot Ankle Int 19 10 (1998) 668-673
15. Mueller M.J., Sinacore D.R., Hoogstrate S., and Daly L. Hip and ankle walking strategies: effect on peak plantar pressures and implications for neuropathic ulceration. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75 11 (1994) 1196-1200
16. Rose N.E., Feiwell L.A., and Cracchiolo A. A method of measuring foot pressures using a high resolution, computerized insole sensor: The effect of heel wedges on plantar pressure distribution and center of force. Foot Ankle Int 13 (1992) 263-270
17. Koch M. Measuring plantar pressure in conventional shoes with the TEKSCAN sensory system. Biomed Tech (Berlin) 38 (1993) 242-248
18. Murphy D.F., Beynnon B.D., Michelson J.D., and Vacek P.M. Efficacy of plantar loading parameters during gait in terms of reliability, variability, effect of gender and relationship between contact area and plantar pressure. Foot Ankle Int 26 2 (2005) 171-179
19. Kernozek T.W., LaMott E.E., and Dancisak M.J. Reliability of an in-shoe pressure measurement system during treadmill walking. Foot Ankle Int 17 4 (1996) 204-209
20. Statistical measures of reliability. In: Portney L.G., and Watkins M.P. (Eds). Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice (1993), Appleton & Lange, East Norwalk
21. Zhu H., Wertsch J.J., Harris G.F., and Alba H.M. Walking cadence effect on plantar pressures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76 11 (1995) 1000-1005
22. Divert C., Mornieux G., Baur H., Mayer F., and Belli A. Mechanical comparison of barefoot and shod running. Int J Sports Med 26 7 (2005) 593-598
23. Eisenhardt J.R., Cook D., Pregler I., and Foehl H.C. Changes in temporal gait characteristics and pressure distribution for bare feet versus various heel heights. Gait Posture 4 4 (1996) 280-286
24. Rosenbaum D., Hautmann S., Gold M., and Claes L. Effects of walking speed on plantar pressure patterns and hindfoot angular motion. Gait Posture 2 3 (1994) 191-197
25. Plank M. The pattern of forefoot pressure distribution in hallux valgus. The Foot 5 1 (1995) 8-14
26. Luger E., Nissan M., Karpf A., Steinberg E., and Dekel S. Dynamic pressures on the diabetic foot. Foot Ankle Int 22 9 (2001) 715-719
27. Bryant A.R., Tinley P., and Singer K.P. Normal values of plantar pressure measurements determined using the EMED-SF system. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 90 6 (2000) 295-299
28. Michaud T. Foot orthoses and other forms of conservative foot cares (1996), Williams and Wilkins, Massachusetts